ISSN 22389-993X DOI: 10.25100/prts |
|
PROSPECTIVA Prospectiva is an open access scientific journal that publishes on a continuous basis, with two issues per volume (year). Its purpose is to validate and disseminate original articles and literature reviews, both in English and Spanish, focused on the field of Social and human sciences. The main topics addressed by the journal include:
Submitted manuscripts undergo a rigorous double-blind peer review process, with the participation of active researchers and experts in the topics covered. The journal serves as an international forum for researchers, university professors, undergraduate and graduate students, as well as for any reader interested in learning about the latest research and debates in the areas of Social Work and Social Intervention. All articles published in Prospectiva are immediately available in open access, in PDF and HTML formats. The journal follows the “diamond” publication open access model, which means that no charges are applied to authors at any stage of the publication process (no article processing charges) as it is financially supported by the Universidad del Valle University Press and the Faculty of Faculty of Humanities, School of Social Work and Human Development. The journal uses the Creative Commons Creative Commons BY-NC-SA 4.0 (Attribution-Noncommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International) for all its articles. Peer Review ProcessProspectiva considers that the evaluation of manuscripts is a fundamental and unavoidable part of the publication process of a scientific journal. Also, its evaluation policy is based on some ICMJE recommendations such as timeliness, peer review and integrity, as reference criteria that supports the entire decision-making process of which manuscripts are included in the journal editions and which are not. Likewise, in order to guarantee the greatest possible independence on the part of independent reviewers in the reading of manuscripts, the journal adopts the “double-blind” peer review system in which the identities of both authors and reviewers are kept confidential throughout the entire process. Now, specifically, the evaluation of manuscripts in the journal is carried out according to the following stages: Editorial review. Manuscripts submitted to the journal undergo an editorial review. This review involves checking that the authors have correctly provided the necessary documents to formalize the submission to the journal. Subsequently, the manuscript is checked using an anti-plagiarism software. If problems of originality or any potentially improper use are detected, the authors will be informed. If no problems are found in the manuscript, the editors will evaluate whether the manuscript meets the required quality standards to be sent to a full external peer review process. In this phase, the editor examines the structure of the manuscript, the bibliography, the most relevant conceptual and methodological aspects, as well as its compliance with the thematic focus of the journal or with the specific issue to which it has been submitted. If everything is in order, the manuscript will be assigned to external reviewers; otherwise, the authors will be informed about the non-acceptance of the manuscript or about the need for corrections before moving to the next stage. Invitation of reviewers. The journal will be responsible for identifying and inviting reviewers for each manuscript approved for review, based on their academic background, research experience, the subject area of the article, and recent relevant publications of the prospective reviewer. The time frame for completing the review will depend on the complexity of the manuscript topic or specific circumstances that arise during the review. However, the journal will recommend a deadline of 2-4 weeks, with the possibility of extension if necessary. If a reviewer fails to deliver the requested report, the editor may reassign the manuscript to another reviewer. Evaluation criteria. The journal uses a form designed to guide the evaluation of manuscripts (download the form here). This form allows both quantitative and qualitative assessment of the manuscript. Formal aspects such as structure, quality of language, use of figures and tables, as well as substantive elements related to theory, methodology, depth of analysis, relevance and timeliness of the bibliography, and the significance of the results or conclusions will be evaluated. The evaluation of each manuscript will also depend on its type, whether it is an original research article, a review of the literature, a discussion article or an analysis of current trends, among other types of manuscripts defined by the journal. Evaluation outcomes. The outcomes of a peer review process can be classified into four categories:
The editors will be responsible for reviewing each of the comments received and consolidating a response to the authors. Authors are free to express to the editor their disagreement with the result of the review, always based on academic or scientific arguments or evidence to support their position. However, the journal is not obliged to reconsider its decision, although the claims will be evaluated to determine if they are justified and if it is necessary to request clarifications to the reviewers or even call a new reviewer, if the editor considers that there is some kind of bias or assessment that does not do justice to the manuscript. Corrected versions. Once the responses of the two or three reviewers have been collected, the journal will issue a detailed result to inform the authors. Articles accepted with the condition of being corrected should be returned along with a response letter detailing the changes made and addressing each of the reviewers' comments. These corrections will be reviewed again by the reviewers, and based on their approval or final recommendations, the editor will make a final decision on the manuscript. If a corrected manuscript still has flaws previously noted by one or more reviewers, authors will be given an additional opportunity to make corrections. If the deficiencies are not satisfactorily resolved, the manuscript may be rejected at this point. Likewise, failure to submit a corrected version within the deadlines agreed upon with the editor may result in rejection, unless an extension for corrections is requested. Timelines. On average, the complete evaluation cycle for a manuscript that passes all phases of the process takes approximately three months. If difficulties arise in finding available reviewers or delays occur in the delivery of reports, the journal will take the necessary steps to reassign manuscripts and notify authors. Requests, complaints or appeals. In case of disagreement with any evaluation result, the process, or any particular request, authors are asked to communicate directly with the journal mailbox. These requests will be evaluated by the editors or by the editor-in-chief and will proceed according to the analysis of each case. |
Form and preparation of manuscripts
Submissions.The submission of manuscripts to the journal should be managed through the Open Journal Systems (OJS) platform. Interested authors should request the creation of a user account at revista.prospectiva@correounivalle.edu.co, sending the basic data: names, surnames, affiliation, notification e-mail and ORCID, together with the complementary documents to the submission (Letter of Commitment, Declaration of Conflict of Interest, Assignment of Intellectual Property Rights): Manuscript submissions to the journal's e-mail will not be accepted, nor will they be processed by this means. The author may contact the journal's e-mail address in case of any problem in uploading files to the platform, so that the Editorial Coordination can resolve the incident. Originality.The journal publishes original papers that have not been previously published in other journals or publishers, and whose publication rights have not been compromised. Authors should avoid submitting articles that have been published by other formal means. Likewise, the unauthorized use of material from other sources such as previously published texts, images or graphics is not allowed. Authors are urged to be careful not to infringe copyrights and to refrain from using protected works without permission, with special attention to images, figures or tables, since such works do not fall under the right of citation (it is not enough to cite the source to avoid infringement of copyright). Similarity check.Once the manuscripts meet the documentary requirements to enter the review process, they will undergo an evaluation with an anti-plagiarism software. This tool will help to identify similarities or possible misuse of other sources. If problems are detected, authors should make clarifications or corrections; otherwise, the manuscript may be rejected for originality or misuse of other copyrighted works. Simultaneous submissions and ethics. Authors must declare in the letter of commitment that the manuscript has not been simultaneously submitted to another journal or publisher for publication. Authors must wait for the journal's decision before submitting the manuscript to another publication, in case it is rejected. In addition, authors must certify that the manuscript has been prepared according to ethical criteria, respecting copyright and applying principles of scientific integrity. Any misconduct in this regard will be a reason for rejection by the journal or could lead to a retraction. Digital identity (authors and institutions).ORCID registration is a mandatory requirement for all authors. Prospectiva will not process manuscripts from authors who are not registered in ORCID. Registration can be done through the following link: https://orcid.org/register In the ORCID profile, the Publisher requires three fields to be completed and publicly available: Employment, Education and qualifications and Works. In addition, authors must provide the ROR (Research Organization Registry) of the institutions with which they are affiliated or of which they are employed or which are involved in funding the research from which their manuscript originates. The ROR can be found here: https://ror.org/ AuthorshipIn compliance with the ICMJE recommendations, the journal adopts its definition of authorship, urging the avoidance of inappropriate practices such as “gift authorship” or unjustified inclusion/exclusion of authors. The four requirements that define authorship, it is reiterated, are the following:
Authors must meet these criteria before submitting a manuscript to avoid inappropriate inclusion or omission of authors. Corresponding authorIn cases where a manuscript has more than one author, it is necessary to designate a corresponding author. The corresponding author will be in charge of maintaining communication with the journal during all stages of the publication process: editorial review, peer review, editing, form and substance corrections, preparation for production, style correction, design and layout, as well as post-publication follow-up. The corresponding author must provide his/her unique bibliographic name, ORCID, current institutional affiliation, e-mail and also a physical institutional (not personal) correspondence address, with the appropriate nomenclature (street/career), including the specification of city and country. Institutional affiliationAll authors of a manuscript must declare their institutional affiliation, which may include the specific academic area (e.g. department, faculty, school), the name of the main institution (such as university or research centre), the city, the country and, preferably, an institutional e-mail address. If authors wish to include more than one institutional affiliation, they may do so. Each affiliation should be numbered in superscript, and if several authors share the same affiliation, the corresponding number should be linked to each author. For example: John Smith 1,2, Sandra Perez 2, Laura Jones 3, Michael Rodriguez 1,3
However, it is recommended, as far as possible, to select only one main affiliation, especially the one that is directly related to the manuscript, such as the funding institution of the research project from which it originates. In case an author wishes to change his/her affiliation after submission of the manuscript, a letter explaining the reasons for the change should be submitted. This letter must be endorsed by a legal representative or an authority from the previous institution, confirming that no proprietary rights have been compromised through any specific project or funding. Each request for a change of affiliation will be reviewed individually by the journal, which will make the final decision. Failure to adequately justify the change may prevent publication of the manuscript. Open AccessThe journal subscribes to the open access movement and the principles of the Budapest Declaration of 2002, with its subsequent updates (BOAI10, BOAI15, BOAI20: https://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/), which aims to make refereed scientific knowledge accessible, at no cost to users and readers, through the internet, and to benefit the development of science, knowledge and the solution of problems facing humanity, in its different societies and cultures. Below, we list some issues related to funding, copyright, access and preservation of the content published by the journal, in line with open access and open science: Charges for authors and accessProspectiva does not impose any charges on authors at any stage of the publication process. Publishing in the journal is completely free of charge and no APCs (Article Processing Charges) are applied. Furthermore, the journal has no embargo periods; all approved articles are immediately available in open access, following the ‘diamond’ model, with funding coming from the Universidad del Valle, which is a public institution, and its University Press. Copyright and Creative Commons licensesAuthors grant the journal and Universidad del Valle the economic rights over accepted manuscripts, but may make any reuse they deem appropriate for professional, educational, academic or scientific reasons, in accordance with the terms of the license granted by the journal to all its articles. Articles will be published under the Creative Commons 4.0 BY-NC-SA licence (Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International). Digital preservationThe journal and Univalle University Press guarantee the long-term preservation of all published content, ensuring that issues and volumes can be retrieved and accessed, even if the editorial project is ever stopped. This is done in accordance with information security policies and the maintenance of electronic platforms. The catalogue of works and the University Press' collection of scientific journals are part of the university's intellectual heritage, contributing to the validation, dissemination and preservation of knowledge in various disciplines. The issues and volumes of the journal are included in the international digital preservation project of Clockss. For more information: https://clockss.org/digital-archive-community/participating-publishers/ Self-archivingProspectiva allows authors to self-archive the final version of manuscripts published by the journal. However, it is requested that wherever the published article is deposited or self-archived, the full reference is included, together with its respective DOI (Digital Object Identifier), so that readers can access the article directly on the journal's official website if they wish to do so. Requirements to formalise the submissionBelow, you can download the forms suggested by the journal to formalise the submission of any manuscript. Please read it, complete it in its entirety and upload it to the platform as an attachment to the original manuscript; please remember that in cases where a signature is required, the document must be read and signed by all authors:
If your research poses any risk to humans or non-human living beings, if it was approved by the ethics committee of your institution or if informed consents were processed, please indicate this in the Letter of Commitment and send all these supports as attachments, also through the platform |
Declaration of ethics and transparency
[Home] [About of a Journal] [Editorial Board] [Subscription]
All the content of this journal is identified under a Creative Commons Licence
© 2019 | Universidad del Valle |
Dirección Postal
Universidad del Valle
Facultad de Humanidades. Edificio 386.
Escuela de Trabajo Social y Desarrollo Humano. 4to piso
Oficina 4033
Ciudad Universitaria Meléndez
Calle 13 # 100-00
A.A.25360
Phone:(57 2)331 52 29 Ext. 101
Cali, Colombia