SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.34 issue1Mechanism of action of five plan growth promoters microorganism author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


Revista de Ciencias Agrícolas

Print version ISSN 0120-0135

Abstract

SILVA-OLAYA, Adriana Marcela; PELLEGRINO CERRI, Carlos Eduardo  and  CERRI, Carlos Clemente. Comparison of sampling methods to evaluate sugarcane root system. Rev. Cienc. Agr. [online]. 2017, vol.34, n.1, pp.7-16. ISSN 0120-0135.  https://doi.org/10.22267/rcia.173401.59.

The knowledge about the architecture of sugarcane root system is limited due to difficulties associated to methodological aspects. The correct way to assess the root system is still not clearly established. This study aimed to compare two direct methods of root biomass evaluation: soil monoliths and root sampling from probes. Three experimental plots (7.2 m2) were randomly established in an area under sugarcane planting on Typic Quartzipsamments located in São Pedro, Sao Paulo state, Brazil. One plant in each experimental plot was selected for root system assessment. The sampling with probes was performed in nine points inside half of the Voronoi polygon and the root density was estimated in nine combinations of sampling points. The root samples collected by the two methods were separate from soil particles by washing in a set of sieves. Afterwards, the roots were oven-dried and weighed. Significant differences(p<0.05) in the density root were found among the soil layers in each treatment. A trend of decreasing root density with soil depth was found in both methods. The probes method tended to underestimate the amount of root found in the soil top layer. Only two sampling combinations with probe indicated to be equivalent to the monolith method.

Keywords : probe; root; root biomass; Saccharum officinarum.

        · abstract in Portuguese     · text in Portuguese     · Portuguese ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License