SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.18 issue2"I'm Missing Something": (Non) Nativeness in Prospective Teachers as Spanish and English SpeakersThe Effect of Communicative Activities on EFL Learners'Motivation: A Case of Students in the Amazon Region of Ecuador author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


Colombian Applied Linguistics Journal

Print version ISSN 0123-4641

Abstract

MOORE, Pauline  and  ANDRADE MAYER, Hugo Abelardo. Constrastive Study of Discursive genre in argumentative essays. Colomb. Appl. Linguist. J. [online]. 2016, vol.18, n.2, pp.25-38. ISSN 0123-4641.  https://doi.org/10.14483/calj.v18n2.9204.

Discourse genres can vary from one culture to another (Connor, 2003) and studies suggest that second language users tend to transfer patterns from one language to the other (Upton and Connor, 2001; Woolever, 2001). However, we know relatively little about how the highly valued genre of the academic essay is learned. In order to identify generic models used by Mexican university students in argumentative essays, we analyzed 36 exemplar texts produced by 18 students in Spanish and English as a second language. We analyzed the essay thesis and reiteration using appraisal theory (Martin and White, 2005; Martin and Rose, 2007) to classify these segments into the categories open and closed with reference to the language of appraisal used in these textual segments. In appraisal theory, argumentation patterns in which monoglossic language choices predominate close down the possibilities for argument, whereas heteroglossic patterns open up the opportunity for disagreement and, hence, argumentation. This resulted in us being able to assign the category of closed or open to the thesis and reiteration. We used these categories to characterize five generic structures: 1) closed thesis, reiteration in conclusion; 2) open thesis, closed reiteration; 3) closed thesis, open reiteration; 4) open thesis, no position assumed; 5) closed thesis in conclusion. We found a preference for the generic structure 2, ˜open thesis, closed reiteration', which occurred in seven of the essays in Spanish and six in English. Notably, we observed a high degree of variability in the patterns used indicating a lack of agreement in this community with regard to the norm for generic structure.

Keywords : appraisal theory; argumentative essay; English for academic purposes; generic structure; higher education.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in Spanish     · Spanish ( pdf )