SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.6 issue1Behind the Headset: Predictive Accuracy of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Voice Symptoms in Call CentersOutcomes of a Community of Practice on Quebec Speech Language Pathologists’ Voice Assessment Practices and Professional Identity author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


Revista de investigación e innovación en ciencias de la salud

On-line version ISSN 2665-2056

Abstract

CARVALHO DE OLIVEIRA, Cristiane Lemos et al. Vocal Load of University Professors: Preliminary Results. Rev. Investig. Innov. Cienc. Salud [online]. 2024, vol.6, n.1, pp.73-97.  Epub Jan 08, 2024. ISSN 2665-2056.  https://doi.org/10.46634/riics.241.

Purpose:

To describe the acoustic characteristics of a classroom, voice quality, fatigue, and vocal load of university professors.

Methods:

Exploratory, observational, longitudinal, and descriptive study with a single group of participants, including vocal monitoring data over two weeks. Acoustic characterization of the classroom, perceptual-auditory evaluation, and acoustic analysis of voice samples were conducted before and after classes. Vocal dosimetry was performed during classes, and the Vocal Fatigue Index (VFI) was assessed at the beginning of each week. Descriptive analysis of the findings was conducted, and randomization test was performed to verify the internal reliability of the judge.

Results:

All participants reported speaking loudly in the classroom, with the majority reporting vocal changes in the past six months, and only one participant reported a current vocal change. The classroom had acoustical measures and estimations that deviated from established standards. The professors used high vocal intensities during classes. After the classes, an increase in the absolute values of the aggregated data for CAPE-V, jitter, and fundamental frequency was found, varying within the range of normality. Furthermore, there was an observed increase in both post-lesson intensity and VFI when comparing the two-week period.

Conclusions:

Vocal intensities and VFI were possibly impacted by the acoustics of the classroom. The increase in average VFI between the weeks may be attributed to a cumulative fatigue sensation. Further research with a larger number of participants and in acoustically conditioned classrooms is suggested in order to evaluate collective intervention proposals aimed at reducing the vocal load on teachers.

Keywords : Voice; voice quality; acoustics; dysphonia; voice disorders; dosimetry; noise; faculty; occupational health.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in English     · English ( pdf )