SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.24 issue2Response of Durum wheat (Triticum turgidum L. var. Durum) to direct and indirect selection under semi-arid conditions in AlgeriaEffect of substrates and rooters on the vegetative propagation of Coffea arabica var. typical in microtunnels author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


Ciencia y Tecnología Agropecuaria

Print version ISSN 0122-8706On-line version ISSN 2500-5308

Cienc. Tecnol. Agropecuaria vol.24 no.2 Mosquera May/Aug. 2023  Epub Aug 31, 2023

https://doi.org/10.21930/rcta.vol24_num2_art:2976 

Genética vegetal y biodiversidad

Screening for Resistance Against Ralstonia Solanacearum in Commercially Available Colombian Potato Varietiest

Búsqueda de resistencia a Ralstonia solanacearum en variedades comerciales de papa en Colombia

Christian David Vargas, conceived the project, performed the experiments, analyzed data, wrote the manuscript1 
http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5079-9955

Mauricio Soto-Suárez, found funding for the project, analyzed data, contributed to writing the manuscript2 
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2392-2839

Paola Zuluaga, conceived the project, performed the experiments, analyzed data, wrote the manuscript2  * 
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3003-4856

1Instituto Colombiano Agropecuario (ICA), Bogotá

2Corporación Colombiana de Investigación Agropecuaria [Agrosavia], Mosquera


Abstract

Ralstonia solanacearum, the causal agent of bacterial wilt, is one of the most devastating bacterial diseases worldwide. In potatoes and many other commercial species such as tomato, banana, plantain, and eggplant, among others, there is a lack of efficient strategies to control this pathogen. Therefore, using resistant cultivars might be the best strategy to prevent this disease. However, breeding for bacterial wilt resistance is challenging since latent infections pose a significant limitation when evaluating resistance to this disease in plant germplasm. Part of the diversity of potato genetic resources is maintained in the Colombian Central Collection (CCC) of potatoes, Corporación Colombiana de Investigación Agropecuaria (Agrosavia). With its 2069 accessions, the CCC is a good source for plant breeding programs. As a first attempt to identify bacterial wilt resistant/tolerant potato sources, 11 commercially available potato varieties were evaluated, representing Andigena and Phureja materials from the CCC. To this end, plants were drench-inoculated with R. solanacearum. This strain was able to cause severe disease in six of the 11 accessions tested. Thus, five highly R. solanacearum-resistant accessions were identified. These results represent a preliminary assessment for identifying bacterial wilt resistance sources that will contribute to establishing a potato breeding program to face this devasting pathogen before it arrives to Colombia.

Keywords disease control; Solanum tuberosum; Ralstonia solanacearum; resistance; germplasm screening

Resumen

Ralstonia solanacearum es el agente causal de la marchitez bacteriana de la papa, una de las enfermedades bacterianas más devastadoras a nivel mundial. En la actualidad no hay una buena estrategia de control para esta enfermedad en la papa y en muchas otras especies comerciales tales como tomate, banano, plátano, berenjena, entre otros. Por este motivo, el uso de genotipos resistentes puede ser la mejor estrategia de control contra esta enfermedad. Sin embargo, el mejoramiento genético para la resistencia a la marchitez bacteriana representa un reto muy grande, ya que las infecciones latentes pueden ser una limitante al evaluar los genotipos resistentes a esta enfermedad. Una parte de la diversidad de los recursos genéticos de papa se conserva en la colección central de Colombia (CCC) de la Corporación Colombiana de Investigación Agropecuaria (Agrosavia). La CCC con sus 2069 accesiones es una fuente importante para programas de mejoramiento genético. Como una primera aproximación para la caracterización e identificación de materiales de papa resistentes o tolerantes a la marchitez bacteriana, se evaluaron 11 variedades comerciales de papa, representantes de los grupos Andigena y Phureja de la CCC. Para esto, las plantas se inocularon por empapamiento y se encontró que la cepa de R. solanacearumque se utilizó fue capaz de causar la enfermedad en seis de las once accesiones evaluadas. Por lo tanto, se identificaron cinco genotipos altamente resistentes. Estos resultados son una evaluación preliminar para la identificación de fuentes de resistencia contra R. solanacearum, lo cual contribuirá al establecimiento de un programa de mejoramiento genético de la papa para enfrentar esta devastadora enfermedad antes de que llegue a Colombia.

Palabras clave control de enfermedades; Solanum tuberosum; Ralstonia solanacearum; resistencia; tamizaje de germoplasma

Introduction

Bacterial wilt, caused by Ralstonia solanacearum, is one of the most important bacterial diseases in plants (Mansfield et al., 2012), with more than 200 host plant species belonging to over 50 different botanical families (Genin & Denny, 2011). This pathogen is present in all continents, primarily in tropical and subtropical regions, but also in Europe and North America, where cold- resistant strains are present (CABI, 2022; Janse et al., 2004; Swanson et al., 2005). Significant crop yield losses in different crops are due to R. solanacearum worldwide. For instance, up to 91% of yield losses have been reported in tomatoes, 33 to 90% in potatoes, and 70 to 100% in bananas (Elphinstone, 2005). Bacterial wilt is thus one of the most devastating plant diseases (Mansfield et al., 2012).

R. solanacearum is considered a species complex (RSSC) due to its high genetic and phenotypic diversity. For decades, the RSSC was divided into five races (R1–R5) based on the host range and six biovars (Bv1–Bv6) based on the metabolic utilization of carbon sources (Denny & Hayward, 2001). Despite being valid for many years, both systems lacked a genetic basis, became unreliable, and were replaced by the phylotype-sequevar system. DNA sequence analyses of the 16S-23S gene intergenic spacer (ITS) region, the transcriptional activator HrpB, and the endoglucanase (egl) genes allowed the classification into four major subdivisions called phylotypes (Fegan & Prior, 2005). The phylotypes correspond to the species’ geographic origin: phylotype I comprises strains from Asia, phylotype II includes two sub-clusters (IIA and IIB) from the Americas (Fegan & Prior, 2005), and phylotypes III and IV comprise strains from Africa and Indonesia, respectively (Paudel et al., 2020). Recently, Safni et al. (2014) proposed a new classification system, which distinguishes R. solanacearum into three genospecies based on phylogenetic analyses of the 16S-23S rRNA ITS gene sequences, 16S-23S rRNA intergenic space region sequences, endoglucanase sequences, and DNA-DNA hybridizations. The first genospecies includes strains from phylotype II, the second genospecies includes R. syzygii, and strains from phylotype IV. Finally, the third genospecies comprises strains belonging to phylotypes I and III (Safni et al., 2014).

Brown rot or bacterial wilt of potatoes is considered a severe threat to the potato industry. It is estimated to cause losses of 950 million dollars annually in 80 countries (Charkowski et al., 2020) and severe crop losses in tropical, subtropical, and warm temperate regions. The disease may also occur in cooler climates, such as relatively high tropic elevations or higher altitudes (Osdaghi, 2022). The bacteria invade the host through the roots, colonizing the xylem vessels in the vascular system. In the early stages of the disease, the first visible symptoms are wilting of the youngest leaves at the end of the branches during the hottest part of the day. Reduced growth, yellowing, and sudden wilt, followed by rapid death, are some later-stage symptoms (Muthoni et al., 2020).

Controlling bacterial wilt is remarkably challenging since it is a soil, water, and seed/tuber-borne pathogen and can survive in soils and water without a host (Genin & Denny, 2011). Its dissemination is a threat to crops, and it is considered a quarantine bacterium by the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) of the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), the North American Plant Protection Organization (NAPPO), the European Plant Protection Organization (EPPO) (Champoiseau et al., 2009), and the Instituto Colombiano Agropecuario (ICA, 2018). ICA was the first to report the presence of this pathogen in Colombia for potatoes in 2018 (ICA, 2018), but it was eradicated and has not been detected since then.

Controlling the presence of the pathogen in soil, water, and seeds is recommended to avoid the dissemination of this bacterium in potatoes (Karim & Hossain, 2018; Kurabachew & Ayana, 2017). Additionally, crop rotation and weed control are advised as control measures in infected soils (Ayana & Fininsa, 2017). Chemical control has not been proven to be highly efficient against bacterial wilt (Karim & Hossain, 2018). Without efficient strategies to eradicate R. solanacearum, using resistant cultivars appears to be the best strategy to control this disease in potatoes (Boschi et al., 2017).

Potato breeding for resistance against this pathogen has been done in Brazil (Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation, Embrapa Hortaliças), Peru (Centro Internacional de la Papa, CIP), Uruguay (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria, INIA) and the USA (University Wisconsin). Programs have leveraged different bacterial wilt resistance/tolerance sources derived from cultivated (S. tuberosum group Phureja) and wild relative species (S. commersonii and S. chocoense) (Carputo et al., 2009; French & Lindo, 1982; Hawkes, 1994; Muthoni et al., 2020; Narancio et al., 2013; Sequeira & Rowe, 1969). However, breeding for resistance against this pathogen is complicated since the resistance/tolerance responses are highly affected by the host-pathogen-environment interactions due to their polygenic nature (Muthoni et al., 2020). Also, latent (symptomless) infections pose a significant limitation when evaluating resistance to this disease in plant germplasm. Breeders may phenotypically choose elite parentals plants that look resistant because they do not show wilting symptoms but that may bear the pathogen in latent infections (Ferreira et al., 2017; Zuluaga Cruz et al., 2013). The introgression of undesired alleles by linkage drag and the plasticity of resistance/tolerance responses (opposite responses at different temperature/high conditions) (French & Lindo, 1982; Tung et al., 1990) further complicate the breeding process. Consequently, the fixation of loci associated with R. solanacearum resistance/tolerance responses, derived mainly from wild tuber-bearing species, in cultivated potatoes is challenging (Muthoni et al., 2020).

The Colombian Central Collection (CCC) of potatoes contains around 2,069 accessions (Moreno & Valbuena, 2006), of which only 13 correspond to commercial varieties, making it a good source for plant breeding programs. Nevertheless, the collection has not been used to its full potential as a source for bacterial wilt resistance. During the 1970s, some resistant S. phureja clones found in the CCC collection were taken to the University of Wisconsin for a breeding program against bacterial wilt, intercrossing some of these clones with S. tuberosum ssp. tuberosum germplasm (Rowe & Sequeira, 1972). These clones were then sent to the CIP in Peru. For decades, the CIP breeding program relied on only two clones of S. phureja as sources of resistance; however, the resistance was very unstable, leading to the incorporation of other species (Muthoni et al., 2020). No studies regarding tolerance/resistance against R. solanacearum in the CCC collection exist. Therefore, we hypothesize that the CCC is essential for identifying tolerant/resistant genotypes against this pathogen. To this end, this study evaluated the response of 11 commercially available accessions from the CCC to R. solanacearum.

Materials and methods

Plant material

To help in the agronomical characterization of the commercially available Colombian potato cultivars, eleven (Table 1) that have not been previously characterized for R. solenacaerum were selected from the CCC of Agrosavia. Plants were in-vitro propagated using the Murashige and Skoog (MS) medium (Murashige & Skoog, 1962) supplemented with vitamins, 3% sucrose, 0.7% plant agar, at pH 5.8 and cultured in growth chambers with 16-h-light/8-h-dark photoperiod at 22 °C and average light intensity of 200 μmoles m-2.-1. Three weeks later, plants were transferred into 22 oz pots (16 cm in height and 9 cm in diameter) containing sterile soil and grown for hardening during three more weeks in a growth chamber at 22–25 °C and 50– 60% relative humidity (RH).

Bacterial strain and growth conditions

The R. solanacearum strain phylotype IIB, a highly aggressive strain isolated from plantain with typical bacterial wilt symptoms in Colombia, was kindly provided by Adriana González from Universidad Nacional de Colombia. Despite being isolated from plantain, phylotype IIB strains are known to infect highland and cold-tolerant potatoes (Otieno et al., 2021). The R. solanacearum strain was kept at -80 °C in a glycerol stock and routinely grown at 28 °C on a Triphenyl tetrazolium chloride (TTC) solid medium (Denny & Hayward, 2001) for 48 hours. To prepare the bacterial culture for inoculation, a colony from the TTC medium was taken and grown in 100 ml of nutrient broth medium at 28 °C for 24 hours in a shaker (Ohta & Hattori, 1980).

Plant inoculation and disease rating

For plant inoculation, the bacterial strain was grown in 100 ml of nutrient broth medium (Ohta & Hattori, 1980) at 28 °C with shaking at 200 rpm for 24 hours. The following day, cells were pelleted by centrifugation, suspended in water, and adjusted using a spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific Genesys 30) to 1x10. CFU/ml (OD600 = 1 for R. solanacaerum). Six-week-old plants were drench-inoculated with 40 ml of 1x10. CFU/ml bacterial suspensions. Control plants were mock-inoculated with 40 ml of water.

Eight plants per genotype were inoculated for disease rating in a complete randomized design in three independent experiments. After inoculation, plants were maintained in a growth chamber at 22–25 °C (50–60% RH) with a 12-h photoperiod. Disease symptoms were first observed two weeks after inoculation. Development was recorded every two days or up to 25 days after inoculation using an ordinal disease index scale: 0 (no wilting symptoms), 1 (0–25% of the leaves showing wilting symptoms), 2 (25– 50% of the leaves showing wilting symptoms), 3 (50–75% of the leaves showing wilting symptoms), 4 (75–100% of the leaves showing wilting symptoms), and 5 (all leaves wilted and plant dead) (Abdrabouh et al., 2019). The area under the disease progress curve (AUDPC) was calculated 15 to 25 days after inoculation (Pedroza & Samaniego, 2009).

Y: Disease index value

t: Test day

The AUDPC data from the three replicated experiments were analyzed by a Generalized Linear Model (GLM). The differences between the means were calculated by LSD Fisher’s test with Bonferroni correction. Additionally, using the disease index (DI), the phenotypic response of each genotype was characterized as resistant or susceptible based on Gorshkov and Tsers (2022); DI = 0 was established as resistant and DI > 0 as susceptible.

Results and Discussion

Disease evaluation showed that six accessions, including five S. tuberosum group Andigena cultivars (Diacol Capiro, Ica Unica, Mary, Parda Fina, and Parda Pastusa) and one from S. tuberosum group Phureja (Criolla Colombia) were highly susceptible to this pathogen with values ranging from 3.62 to 4 (Table 1). In contrast, five accessions, including one S. tuberosum group Phureja (Sol Andina) and four S. tuberosum group Andigena (Pastusa Superior, Perla Negra, Roja Nariño and Superior), were highly resistant/tolerant (Table 1).

Table 1. Disease index (DI) and classification of each potato genotype evaluated as resistant (DI= 0) or susceptible (DI > 0) 

* ClassificationResistant (R); Susceptible (S).

Source: Prepared by the authors

Bacterial wilt symptoms of three susceptible and three resistant accessions are depicted in Figure 1. Phenotypic evaluation of the potato accessions shows that susceptible accessions are completely wilted 25 days after inoculation (Figure 1A), while resistant varieties lack symptoms (Figure 1B).

Source: Prepared by the authors.

Figure 1. Phenotypic evaluation of potato germplasm for resistance against R. solanacearum. Symptoms are developed in three susceptible accessions: Mary, Ica Unica, and Parda Pastusa (A), compared to symptomless resistant accessions: Sol Andina, Superior, and Roja Nariño (B) at the end of the experiment, 25 days after inoculation. The vertical white line corresponds to 16 cm. 

The aggressiveness of R. solanacaerum, calculated using the AUDPC, was evaluated in all accessions from the susceptible cultivars: the accessions of S. tuberosum group Phureja (Criolla Colombia) and S. tuberosum group Andigena (Diacol Capiro, Ica Unica, Mary, Parda Fina ,and Parda Pastusa) showed a similar degree of susceptibility against the R. solanacearum isolate (Figure 2).

These results are relevant for Colombia since it implies that there are strains in the field capable of causing disease on the potato cultivars that the farmers currently use. Also highlights the importance of having germplasm banks to search for resistance/tolerance traits. In the case of Colombia, five highly resistant accessions against this pathogen are commercially available. Still, there was a lack of knowledge of these resources since these accessions were not characterized before for this pathogen.

Source: Prepared by the authors.

Figure 2. Aggressiveness of R. solanacearum on potato genotypes. Mean area under the disease progress curve (AUDPC) values for three experiments with eight replicates and standard deviation of the genotype are depicted. The resistant accessions exhibited symptoms at the end of the experiment, 25 days after inoculation. AUDPC data were subjected to GLM analyses in R 3.6 using the lme4 package (Bates et al., 2019). The capital letters significantly indicate differences (p ≤ 0.05) among genotypes according to LSD Fisher’s test with Bonferroni correction. 

Breeding for resistance against bacterial wilt is probably the best option to control this disease. The use of antibiotics in agriculture is banned almost worldwide, chemicals are not efficient, biological control agents are not commercially available, and cultural practices are difficult to apply (Boschi et al., 2017; Champoiseau et al., 2009). Thus, finding these five tolerant accessions with agronomically desirable traits is a significant step towards having a reservoir for bacterial wilt resistance cultivars ready to be deployed to the field. Also, they could be used as resistant parentals in breeding programs. It is important to note that resistance genes have been previously found in wild potato species, such as Solanum commersonii, S. stenotomum, and S. goniocalyx, among others; however, resistance was affected by high temperatures, and the plants had latent infections (Ferreira et al., 2017; González et al., 2013; Narancio et al., 2013; Zuluaga Cruz et al., 2013). Resistant clones of S. commersonii have reduced wilting symptoms rather than complete immunity against R. solanacearum (Otieno et al., 2021; Zuluaga Cruz et al., 2013). Because the five tolerant accessions found in this work did not show wilting symptoms 25 days after inoculation, it will be a natural next step to determine the nature of the resistance, whether it is due to a quantitative trait locus (QTL) or R-genes involved. It will be critical to determine whether these resistant cultivars can harbor bacteria in latent infections, select parental cultivars with the potential for plant breeding programs and understand the resistance’s nature. However, these results show a potential added value in some of these commercial varieties for potato growers and plant breeders. These results highly impact Colombian agriculture since new sources of resistance against this devastating pathogen in rarely used commercial varieties ready to be deployed on the field were found.

Conclusions

The Colombian Potato Germplasm Bank constitutes an essential source of genetic diversity, and screening these genotypes against potato bacterial wilt is necessary to identify resistant varieties. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study characterizing 11 potato accessions against R. solanacearum commercially available in Colombia, demonstrating the importance of germplasm banks as a source for plant breeding programs to introgress important agronomical traits.

Ethical implications

The authors have no ethical implication in this article.

Authors’ contributions

CV and PZ conceived the project, performed the experiments, analyzed data, and wrote the manuscript. MSS found funding for the project, analyzed data, and contributed to writing the manuscript.

Acknowledgments

We thank Aura Andrade Pineda and Linda Gomez Arias for kindly providing the in-vitro plants, Professor Adriana Gonzalez from Universidad Nacional de Colombia for kindly providing the R. solanacearum strain we used, and Felix E. Enciso-Rodriguez for his valuable comments on the manuscript.

References

Abdrabouh, H. S., Zein El-abdeen, A. A., & Abdel-Ghafar, N. Y. (2019). Interaction between Biotic and Abiotic Agents to Control of Potato Bacterial Wilt Disease. Arab Universities Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 27(2), 1591-1604. https://doi.org/10.21608/ajs.2019.12032.1026Links ]

Ayana, G., & Fininsa, C. (2017). Effect of Crop Rotation on Tomato Bacterial Wilt (Ralstonia solanacearum) and Survival of the Pathogen in the Rhizospheres and Roots of Different Crops in Ethiopia. International Journal of Phytopathology, 5(3). https://doi.org/10.33687/phytopath.005.03.1932Links ]

Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B. M., & Walker, S. C. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67, 81611. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01Links ]

Boschi, F., Schvartzman, C., Murchio, S., Ferreira, V., Siri, M. I., Galván, G. A., Smoker, M., Stransfeld, L., Zipfel, C., Vilaró, F. L., & Dalla-Rizza, M. (2017). Enhanced Bacterial Wilt Resistance in Potato Through Expression of Arabidopsis EFR and Introgression of Quantitative Resistance from Solanum commersonii]. Frontiers in Plant Science, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.01642Links ]

CABI. (2022). Ralstonia solanacearum race 1 (bacterial wilt of solanaceous crops). In CABI Compendium. CABI International. https://doi.org/10.1079/cabicompendium.44998Links ]

Carputo, D., Aversano, R., Barone, A., Di Matteo, A., Iorizzo, M., Sigillo, L., Zoina, A., & Frusciante, L. (2009). Resistance to Ralstonia solanacearum of Sexual Hybrids Between Solanum commersonii and S. tuberosum. American Journal of Potato Research, 86(3), 196-202. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12230-009-9072-4Links ]

Champoiseau, P. G., Jones, J. B., & Allen, C. (2009). Ralstonia solanacearum Race 3 Biovar 2 Causes Tropical Losses and Temperate Anxieties. Plant Health Progress, 10(1), 35. https://doi.org/10.1094/PHP-2009-0313-01-RVLinks ]

Charkowski A., Sharma K., Parker M.L., Secor G.A., Elphinstone J. Bacterial diseases of potato. In: Campos, H., Ortiz, O. (eds), The Potato Crop. 2020, Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28683-5_10Links ]

Denny, T., & Hayward, A. (2001). Gram-negative bacteria: Ralstonia. In N. Schaad, J. Jones, & W. Chun (Eds.), Laboratory Guide for Identification of Plant Pathogenic Bacteria (3rd ed. ed., pp. 151-174 ). APS Press. [ Links ]

Elphinstone, J. G. (2005). The current bacterial wilt situation: a global overview. In C. Allen, Piror P. & A. C. Hayward (Eds.), Bacterial wilt disease and the Ralstonia solanacearum species complex (pp. 9-28). APS press. [ Links ]

Fegan, M., & Prior, P. (2005). How complex is the Ralstonia solanacearum species complex? In C. Allen, P. Prior, & A. Hayward (Eds.), Bacterial Wilt: The Disease and the Ralstonia solanacearum Species Complex (pp. 449-461). American Phytopathological Society. [ Links ]

Ferreira, V., Pianzzola, M.J., Vilaró, F.L, Galván, G.A., Tondo, M.L., Rodriguez, M.V., Orellano, E.G., Valls, M., & Siri, M. (2017). Interspecific Potato Breeding Lines Display Differential Colonization Patterns and Induced Defense Responses after Ralstonia solanacearum Infection. Frontiers in Plant Science, 8.https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.01424Links ]

French, E., & Lindo, D. (1982). Resistance to Pseudomonas solanacearum in potato: specificity and temperature sensitivity. Phytopathology, 72, 1408-1412. https://doi.org/10.1094/Phyto-72-1408Links ]

Genin, S., & Denny, T. P. (2011). Pathogenomics of the Ralstonia solanacearum Species Complex. Annual Review of Phytopathology, 50(1), 67-89. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-phyto-081211-173000Links ]

González, M., Galván, G., Siri, M. I., Borges, A., & Vilaró, F. (2013). Resistencia a la marchitez bacteriana de la papa en Solanum commersonii Dun. Agrociencia, 17(1), 45-54. https://doi.org/10.31285/AGRO.17.513Links ]

Gorshkov, V., & Tsers, I. (2022). Plant susceptible responses: the underestimated side of plant– pathogen interactions. Biological Reviews, 97(1), 45-66. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12789Links ]

Hawkes, J. G. (1994). Origins of cultivated potatoes and species relationships. In J. E. Bradshaw & G. R. Mackay (Eds.), Potato Genetics (pp. 3-42). CAB International. [ Links ]

ICA. (2018). Situación actual de la bacteria Ralstonia solanacearum Raza 3 Biovar 2 en Colombia. ICA https://www.ica.gov.co/areas/agricola/servicios/epidemiologia-agricola/saf/notificacion-oficial/detalle-notificacion-oficial/situacion-actual-de-la-bacteria-ralstonia-solanace.aspxLinks ]

Janse, J. D., van den Beld, H. E., Elphinstone, J., Simpkins, S., Tjou-Tam-Sin, N. N. A., & van Vaerenbergh, J. (2004). Introduction to Europe of Ralstonia solanacearum biovar 2, race 3 in pelargonium zonale cuttings. Journal of Plant Pathology, 86(2), 147-155. http://www.jstor.org/stable/41998184Links ]

Karim, Z., & Hossain, M. S. (2018). Management of bacterial wilt (Ralstonia solanacearum) of potato: focus on natural bioactive compounds. Journal of Biodiversity Conservation and Bioresource Management, 4(1), 73-92. https://doi.org/10.3329/jbcbm.v4i1.37879Links ]

Kurabachew, H., & Ayana, G. (2017). Bacterial Wilt caused by Ralstonia solanacearum in Ethiopia: Statusa And Management Approaches: A Review. International Journal of Phytopathology, 5(3). https://esciencepress.net/journals/index.php/phytopath/article/view/1829Links ]

Mansfield, J., Genin, S., Magori, S., Citovsky, V., Sriariyanum, M., Ronald, P., Dow, M., Verdier, V., Beer, S. V., Machado, M. A., Toth, I., Salmond, G., & Foster, G. D. (2012). Top 10 plant pathogenic bacteria in molecular plant pathology. Molecular Plant Pathology, 13(6), 614-629. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1364-3703.2012.00804.xLinks ]

Moreno, J., & Valbuena, I. (2006). Colección central colombiana de papa: riqueza de variabilidad genética para el mejoramiento del cultivo. Corpoica, Ciencia & Tecnología Agropecuaria, 4(4), 1-9. [ Links ]

Murashige, T., & Skoog, F. (1962). A Revised Medium for Rapid Growth and Bio Assays with Tobacco Tissue Cultures. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 15, 473-497. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.1962.tb08052.xLinks ]

Muthoni, J., Shimelis, H., & Melis, R. (2020). Conventional breeding of potatoes for resistance to bacterial wilt (Ralstonia solanacearum): Any light in the horizon?. Australian Journal of Crop Science, 14(3), 485-494. https://doi.org/10.21475/ajcs.20.14.03.p2144Links ]

Narancio, R., Zorrilla, P., Robello, C., Gonzalez, M., Vilaró, F., Pritsch, C., & Dalla Rizza, M. (2013). Insights on gene expression response of a characterized resistant genotype of Solanum commersonii Dun. against Ralstonia solanacearum. European Journal of Plant Pathology, 136(4), 823-835. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10658-013-0210-yLinks ]

Ohta, H., & Hattori, T. (1980). Bacteria sensitive to nutrient broth medium in terrestrial environments. Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 26(1), 99-107. https://doi.org/10.1080/00380768.1980.10433216Links ]

Osdaghi, E. (2022). Ralstonia solanacearum (bacterial wilt of potato). CABI International. https://doi.org/10.1079/cabicompendium.45009Links ]

Otieno, S. A., Collins, P., Coombs, J., Allen, C., & Douches, D. S. (2021). Screening for Ralstonia solanacearum Resistance in Solanum commersonii. American Journal of Potato Research, 98(1), 72- 77. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12230-020-09819-8Links ]

Paudel, S., Dobhal, S., Alvarez, A. M., & Arif, M. (2020). Taxonomy and Phylogenetic Research on Ralstonia solanacearum Species Complex: A Complex Pathogen with Extraordinary Economic Consequences. Pathogens, 9(11), 886. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens9110886Links ]

Pedroza, S., & Samaniego, G. (2009). Análisis del área bajo la curva del progreso de las enfermedades (ABPE) en patosistemas agrícolas. In B. Martínez, L. S. Rojas, & R. P. Pacheco (Eds.), Tópicos selectos de estadística aplicados a la fitosanidad (pp. 179-189). Colegio de Posgraduados. [ Links ]

Rowe, P. R., & Sequeira, I. (1972). Development of potato clones with resistance to bacterial wilt. In F. ER (Ed.), Prospects for the potato in the developing world. (pp. 206-211). Centro Internacional de la Papa. [ Links ]

Safni, I., Cleenwerck, I., De Vos, P., Fegan, M., Sly, L., & Kappler, U. (2014). Polyphasic taxonomic revision of the Ralstonia solanacearum species complex: proposal to emend the descriptions of Ralstonia solanacearum and Ralstonia syzygii and reclassify current R. syzygii strains as Ralstonia syzygii subsp. syzygii subsp. nov., R. solanacearum phylotype IV strains as Ralstonia syzygii subsp. indonesiensis subsp. nov., banana blood disease bacterium strains as Ralstonia syzygii subsp. celebesensis subsp. nov. and R. solanacearum phylotype I and III strains as Ralstonia pseudosolanacearumsp. nov. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, 64(9), 3087-3103. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.066712-0Links ]

Sequeira, L., & Rowe, P. R. (1969). Selection and utilization of Solanum phureja clones with high resistance to different strains of Pseudomonas solanacearum. American Potato Journal, 46, 451- 462. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02862028Links ]

Swanson, J. K., Yao, J., Tans-Kersten, J., & Allen, C. (2005). Behavior of Ralstonia solanacearum Race 3 Biovar 2 During Latent and Active Infection of Geranium. Phytopathology™, 95(2), 136-143. https://doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO-95-0136Links ]

Tung, P. X., Rasco, E. T., Vander Zaag, P., & Schmiediche, P. (1990). Resistance to Pseudomonas solanacearum in the potato: II. Aspects of host-pathogen-environment interaction. Euphytica, 45(3), 211-215. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00032988Links ]

Zuluaga Cruz, A. P., Ferreira, V., Pianzzola, M. J., Siri, M. I., Coll, N. S., & Valls, M. (2013). A Novel, Sensitive Method to Evaluate Potato Germplasm for Bacterial Wilt Resistance Using a Luminescent Ralstonia solanacearum Reporter Strain. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions®, 27(3), 277-285. https://doi.org/10.1094/MPMI-10-13-0303-FILinks ]

FundingThis work was supported by the Corporación Colombiana de Investigación Agropecuaria (Agrosavia) and Ministerio de Agricultura y Desarrollo Rural (MADR), grant number 1000941 (TV19).

Received: March 12, 2022; Accepted: March 17, 2023; Published: June 04, 2023

* Corresponding author: Paola Zuluaga. Corporación Colombiana de Investigación Agropecuaria [Agrosavia]. Km 14, Vía Mosquera, Colombia azuluaga@agrosavia.co

Conflict of interest: All authors contributed significantly to the manuscript and agreed on the results presented. The authors state no conflict of interest in this study.

Creative Commons License Esta obra está bajo una Licencia Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional.