SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.17 issue32What Optimistic Responses to Deep Disagreement get Right (and Wrong)“If i do not have any money, why do you want my inheritance?”: The figure of the beggar in the poetry of Joaquín Pablo Posada author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


Co-herencia

Print version ISSN 1794-5887

Abstract

CARDENAS, Luz Gloria. Endoxa, Hypólepsis Parádoxos and Martyría in Aristotle’s Theory of Slavery. Co-herencia [online]. 2020, vol.17, n.32, pp.239-255. ISSN 1794-5887.  https://doi.org/10.17230/co-herencia.17.32.9.

This paper initially discusses Aristotle’s theory of slavery in his Book I of Politics in an attempt to demonstrate the use of two procedures: a dialectic process, based on his discussion with Plato, and a rhetorical process, using metaphors and testimonies to set up an epistemological framework for his theory. Subsequently, this work focuses on an issue to be elucidated: the difference between endoxa, thesis (hypólepsis parádoxos), and testimony (martyría). In his description of the dialectical method in Topics, Aristotle explicitly states the meaning of “endoxa” and “thesis”. Furthermore, he discusses the term “testimony” in Books i and ii of Rhetoric. Consequently, these two types of procedures, the types of proof, and the conclusions in his Book i of Politics will be identified based on the characteristics described in Topics and Rhetoric.

Keywords : Aristotle; endoxa; testimony; thesis; rhetoric; dialectic; slavery.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in Spanish     · Spanish ( pdf )