SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.62 issue151THE ORIGIN AND NATURE OF THE STATE IN FRANCISCO DE VITORIA'S MORAL PHILOSOPHYJustice and Genetics: Offsetting the Difference author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


Ideas y Valores

Print version ISSN 0120-0062

Abstract

DIMITRIU, CRISTIAN. THE PRACTICAL INTERPRETATION OF THE CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE: A DEFENSE. Ideas y Valores [online]. 2013, vol.62, n.151, pp.105-113. ISSN 0120-0062.

The article compares two different interpretations of Kant's categorical imperative −the practical and the logical one− and defends the practical one, arguing that it is superior because it rejects cases of free riding without necessarily rejecting cases of coordination or timing. The logical interpretation, on the other hand, leads to the undesirable outcome that it does not reject immoral cases of free riding, and to the desired outcome that it does not reject maxims of coordination/timing. Given that neither of them rejects maxims of coordination/timing (they are similar in that sense) and only the practical interpretation rejects free riding, the logical interpretation should be rejected.

Keywords : B. Herman; C. Korsgaard; I. Kant; O. O'Neill; categorical imperative.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in English     · English ( pdf )