SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.43 issue3Chlamydia psittaci seropositivity in workers exposed to birds and review of the literature: Evidence of circulation in AntioquiaMolecular characterization of the Plasmodium falciparum k13 gene helix domain in samples from native communities of Condorcanqui, Amazonas, Perú author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


Biomédica

Print version ISSN 0120-4157On-line version ISSN 2590-7379

Abstract

RAMIREZ, Diana et al. X-ray radiation dose and associated factors in neonates from the newborn unit of Hospital Universitario San Ignacio, Bogotá, Colombia. Biomed. [online]. 2023, vol.43, n.3, pp.343-351.  Epub Sep 30, 2023. ISSN 0120-4157.  https://doi.org/10.7705/biomedica.6668.

Introduction.

Radiographs are still widely used, underestimating the risks. This situation is frequent in neonatal care units, generating radiation doses than in adults.

Objective.

To quantify the received radiation doses when performing radiographs on neonates and the possible factors associated with higher doses.

Materials and methods.

We performed an observational study of 160 neonates from the newborn unit of the Hospital Universitario San Ignacio, Bogotá, Colombia. We considered the input dose of each radiograph as the dependent variable. Patients were characterized and a multivariate analysis with multiple linear regression was performed to identify associated factors.

Results.

We analyzed 160 newborns and 492 radiographs. The most frequent findings were male patients (n=87, 54.4%), cesarean delivery (n=122, 76.3%), and radiograph indication for respiratory distress (n=123, 24.9%). One-point eight percent of the patients (n=9) did not have radiograph indication. The most frequently taken radiograph was chest (322, 65.4%). Most radiographs were taken with a computerized equipment (n=352, 71.5%), compared to a digital one (n=140, 28.4%). The median input dose with computerized equipment was 0.112 mGy (0.022, 0.134 mGy), and with the digital equipment was 0.020 mGy (0.019, 0.022 mGy).

Conclusions.

The general and specific absorbed radiation doses were measured in neonates with a computerized and a digital equipment. We identified higher doses with the computerized equipment. In addition, it was recognized the correlation between computerized radiography equipment with lower corrected gestational ages as the main factor for dose increase.

Keywords : Infant, newborn; radiation dosage; radiation; radiography; risk factors.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in Spanish     · Spanish ( pdf )