SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
 issue30Can Anomalies Be Treated as Falsifying Instances?Heidegger and Kant's thesis on being. Regarding the conference of 1961 author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


Praxis Filosófica

Print version ISSN 0120-4688On-line version ISSN 2389-9387

Abstract

GARZON VALLEJO, Iván. Dilemmas of the Public Nature of Philosophical and Religious Arguments in the Liberalism of John Rawls. Prax. filos. [online]. 2010, n.30, pp.39-63. ISSN 0120-4688.

The paper presents the most significant critiques against the liberal political philosophy of John Rawls when addressing the problem of the public nature of the philosophical and religious arguments in the contemporary pluralistic society. Such criticism expresses the dilemmas of the Rawlsian approach at the moment of its practical implementation. It also suggests that since the author maintains certain suspicious regarding the potential of his arguments to destabilize a democratic society, he is giving to them a semipublic status in the political debate. Accordingly, the paper highlights the serious difficulty of establishing a liberal proposal of justice that bypasses the whole question of good.

Keywords : John Rawls; Liberalism; Pluralism; Religion; Public square.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in Spanish     · Spanish ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License