Services on Demand
Journal
Article
Indicators
- Cited by SciELO
- Access statistics
Related links
- Cited by Google
- Similars in SciELO
- Similars in Google
Share
Praxis Filosófica
Print version ISSN 0120-4688On-line version ISSN 2389-9387
Abstract
ABAL, Federico Germán. Two strategies against the argument of coercionist associationism. Prax. filos. [online]. 2020, n.50, pp.107-120. ISSN 0120-4688. https://doi.org/10.25100/pfilosofica.v0i50.8673.
In this work I reconstruct the argumentative structure of the coercionist associationism defended by Michael Blake, which consists of two premises, one normative and the other factual. I argue that both premises can be rejected indirectly (in the case of the factual premise) or directly (in the case of normative premise). The conclusion is that the coercionist associationism does not prove the existence of a normative discontinuity between the domestic sphere and the global sphere.
Keywords : Coercion; Egalitarianism; Associationism; Cosmopolitism; Justice.