SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
 issue54Lessons from the creativity workshops of Antonio CaroAncient and Modern Technology: Heidegger’s Applicability in the Philosophy of Technology author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


Praxis Filosófica

Print version ISSN 0120-4688On-line version ISSN 2389-9387

Abstract

PENA RAIGOZA, Jesús Alfonso. The Separation of Platonic Forms: A Critique of Gail Fine's Interpretation. Prax. filos. [online]. 2022, n.54, pp.131-152.  Epub Mar 09, 2022. ISSN 0120-4688.  https://doi.org/10.25100/pfilosofica.v0i54.11937.

According to Aristotle, the Platonic Forms are problematic because they are separated from their participants. A recent interpretation by Gail Fine proposes that, for Aristotle, such separation is not categorical, as has traditionally been maintained, but modal, and that this is consistent with Platonic dialogues. Furthermore, Fine argues that viewing separation in this way could make Platonic theory less objectionable. In this work I present several arguments against the separation of Forms being modal, since assuming such a thing entails textual and internal coherence problems. Therefore, objections to separation should be answered in another way.

Keywords : Forms; Separation; Modal; Immanence; Ontological Priority.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in Spanish     · Spanish ( pdf )