SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
 issue65Can there be an input from philosophical debates on a better use of nature? Towards an improvement of nature rights in environmental economics author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


Estudios de Filosofía

Print version ISSN 0121-3628

Abstract

TORRES ALDAVE, Mikel. Who owns nature? Sentience, environmental ethics and intervention in nature. Estud.filos [online]. 2022, n.65, pp.7-29.  Epub Mar 22, 2022. ISSN 0121-3628.  https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.ef.345879.

Who owns nature? The question could be less important than reducing ani- mal sufferings in nature. It does not matter if nature does not belong to anyone (or if it belongs to everybody) or if it belongs to someone, because in both cases there are limitations, linked with animal welfare, regarding what we should do in nature. Sentient beings have interests that we must take into account when designing environmental policies. Since neither ecosystems nor plants have interests, preserving nature is less important than reducing animal sufferings. The relevant moral issue is, therefore, knowing what happens to sentient animals in nature and developing policies to reduce their suf- ferings. This implies that we have the moral obligation of intervening in nature with the aim of reducing animal sufferings, so conservationist environmental policies defended by ecologists are morally unacceptable.

Keywords : animal ethics; ecologism; welfare biology; interests; animal welfare; intervention in nature.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in Spanish     · Spanish ( pdf )