SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.19 issue1Cryptosporidium spp., comparative diagnosis and geospatial distribution in diarrheic calves from dairy farms, Valdivia, ChileRisk factors for ovarian postpartum resumption in Holstein cows, under high tropical conditions author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


Revista MVZ Córdoba

Print version ISSN 0122-0268

Rev.MVZ Cordoba vol.19 no.1 Córdoba Jan./Apr. 2014

 

ORIGINAL

Effect of sugarcane silage on productive parameters of replacement Holstein-Friesian heifers

 

Efecto del ensilado de caña de azúcar en los parámetros productivos de vaquillas Holstein-Friesian para reemplazo

 

José Reyes G,1 Ph.D, Oziel Montañez-Valdez,1* Ph.D, Candido Guerra M,2 Ph.D, José Palma G,3 Ph.D.

1University of Guadalajara, Centro Universitario del Sur, Departamento de Desarrollo Regional. Ave. Enrique Arreola Silva 883, Ciudad Guzman, Jalisco. 49000. Mexico.
2University of Guadalajara, Centro Universitario de la Costa Sur, Autlan de Navarro, Jalisco. Departamento de Desarrollo Regiona.
3Universidad de Colima, Centro Universitario de Investigacion y Desarrollo Agropecuario. Carretera Colima-Manzanillo. Km 40. Colima, Mexico.

*Correspondence: montanez77@hotmail.com

Received: June 2013; Accepted: October 2013.


ABSTRACT

Objective. Measure the productive parameters of Holstein-Friesian females from weaning to 470 days old, comparing feeding through sugarcane silage (SCS) and corn silage (CS) in a concentrated fodder ratio of 70:30. Materials and methods. Twenty-eight post-weaning calves were used, with an average age of 80±16 days old and an initial weight of 79.5±12.9 kg. The T-Student test was used for the comparison of means, where calves were divided into two groups of 14, one for each treatment. The body weight BW (kg), wither height WH (cm), body condition BC (1 to 5 scale), daily weight gain DWG (kg) and feed conversion FC (kg) was measured every 30 days. Results. Differences were found between treatments, where heifers fed with SCS showed better BC (3.12), FC (7.4) as compared to the CS treatment. No significant differences were found in terms of DWG (0.666 and 0.743 kg/d). Conclusions. Feeding based on sugarcane silage allows for an improved body condition and feed conversion of animals having with this an acceptable and cost-effective production performance in the raising of dairy replacements.

Key words: Corn, feeding of animals, silage, replacement (Source: NAL Thesaurus).


RESUMEN

Objetivo. Medir los parámetros productivos de hembras Holstein-Friesian desde el destete hasta los 470 días de edad, comparando la alimentación con ensilado de caña de azúcar (ECA) y ensilado de maíz (EM) en una proporción forraje concentrado de 70:30. Materiales y métodos. Se utilizaron 28 becerras, con una edad promedio de 80±16 días y un peso inicial de 79.5±12.9 kg. Se utilizó la prueba de comparación de medias T- Student, donde se dividieron las becerras en dos grupos de 14, uno para cada tratamiento. Cada 30 días se midió el peso corporal, PC (kg); altura a la cruz, AC (cm); condición corporal, CC (escala de 1 a 5); ganancia diaria de peso, GDP (kg); y conversión alimenticia, CA (kg). Resultados. Se encontraron diferencias entre los tratamientos, donde las vaquillas alimentadas con ECA mostraron mejor CC (3.12), CA (7.4) en comparación con el tratamiento EM. No se encontraron diferencias significativas en cuanto a la GDP (0.666 y 0.743 kg/d). Conclusiones. La alimentación basada en ensilaje de caña de azúcar permite una mejora en la condición corporal y en la conversión alimenticia de los animales teniendo con esto un comportamiento productivo aceptable y económicamente rentable en la crianza de reemplazos lecheros.

Palabras clave: Alimentación de animales, ensilado, maíz, reemplazo (Fuente: NAL Thesaurus).


INTRODUCTION

Breeding is a vital component of modern dairy farms, as it provides a consistent and cost- effective supply of high-quality replacements, this goal is achieved through the implementation of efficient breeding systems both in nutrition as in health to ensure this purpose, adapting the same to the particular region and exploitation (1). In this sense, Schingoethe and Garcia (2) point out that one of the main factors limiting the development of dairy farming is the raising of replacement heifers, so it is essential to seek alternative solutions and design production systems according to the socio-economic reality, which in the case of the milk industry result in efficient, attractive and economically affordable production for the producer, as well as being accessible for the entire population and allow the cost-effective breeding of replacements for the preservation of these systems.

In bovine production fodder plays a critical role, since it is the most economical source of nutrients, among these silages are renowned by their low variation in nutritional quality (3,4). Therefore, the silage of fodder crops could be an option that contributes significantly to optimize the operation of animal production systems (dairy replacements) in tropical and subtropical areas. Although appropriate supplements are required to improve production, preferably slow consumption with appropriate inputs of nitrogen, lipids and minerals to correct constraints (5,6).

Sugarcane is possibly the herbaceous crop with the highest performance in terms of biomass per area and time unit. It outperforms other high-yield plants such as corn and wheat. Its ability to maintain high digestibility with growing maturity provides an important advantage as food for ruminants, especially during the dry season when most other fodders are unavailable and of low quality (6,7).

The lack of information concerning the development of Holstein-Friesian heifers that will be the future replacement of animals in production and their development with local fodder and food leads to the development of this type of work, hence the objective of this study was to evaluate the feeding system based on sugarcane silage in the development of Holstein-Friesian heifers.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study site. This study was carried out in the Agricultural Farm "DOS PIVOTES" engaged in the production of milk and breeding stock (replacement heifers and stallions), and the production of sugarcane for the industry. The ranch is located to the southwest of the Municipality of Zapotlan El Grande, in the State of Jalisco, Mexico; with geographic coordinates 19°27'13" north latitude and meridians 103°27'57" west longitude, with an altitude of 1.520 m. The climate is warm, with average annual rainfall of 732 mm distributed in the months of June to September, and occasional winter or summer rainfall. Its average temperature is 20.2°C (8).

Procedures. Twenty-eight Holstein-Friesian calves were used with an initial average age of 80±16 days old and an average live weight of 79.5±12.9 kg. The body weight was measured every 30 days, the weighing of the heifers was carried out through the measurement of the thoracic perimeter with a tape in centimeters and the use of a live weight conversion table, the wither height was measured with a metallic vertical ruler of 1.5 m and a sliding set-square of the same material, body condition (BC) with a 1 to 5 scale according to Edmonson et al (9), daily weight gain DWG (kg), consumption (g MS/kg PV0.75) and feed conversion (FC), during a period of 470 days. Animals were treated with ivermectin. At three months of age the bacterin Brucel® RB51-PLUS for brucella was applied and the vaccination was strengthened one month later. Between four and five months old, a vaccine for bovine respiratory disease complex was administered (Express™ 10 HS), Pasterella (One-Shot™) and Clostridium (Barvac™)(10).

Heifers were handled in two lots distributed randomly; where a fodder:supplement ratio of (70:30) was proposed, dry base and a consumption rate of 3% of their body weight in dry base was suggested. The control treatment was the traditional feeding system of the Ranch based on corn silage (Zea mays), corn stover, Rhodes grass hay (Chloris gayana), commercial concentrate with 16.5% protein through a full portion and the experimental system with sugarcane silage (Saccharum officinarumm) and a supplement for the activation of rumen (SAR; Table 1) separately from the fodder. The foods used were analyzed for their chemical composition according to the AOAC (Table 2) (10). The following formula was used for the calculation of the metabolizing energy:

1.81+0.064x%Gross Protein=Mcal EM kg-1 MS (11).

Statistical analysis. The obtained data were analyzed using the T Student test (12).

RESULTS

The results obtained are shown in table 3. Higher consumption was observed with the corn silage strategy; however, the ratio in the consumption of fodder-concentrate for the system based on sugarcane silage remained homogenous until the end of the experiment.

Young animals had a lower consumption of fodder, which increased as the animal grew. The feed conversion was better for the sugarcane silage strategy; the evolution of consumption expressed in dry base was observed as a similar initial consumption for the two systems, but after 200 days of age better consumption was recorded in total dry base for the corn silage system, although this was not reflected in a significantly higher DWG, thus the SCS having better feed conversion; thereby demonstrating that its use may be more advantageous than CS. Reproductive results show a variation in terms of productive behavior in relation to the productive strategy employed according to the development stage of cattle.

In the first stage that ends at 350 days of age, both the weight (p<0.035) and body condition (p<0.001) had significant differences in these variables, the corn silage system resulted in higher values. For the second stage ending at 470 days of age, a favorable difference in the body condition (p<0.01) was observed in comparison to the corn silage system, and the other variables showed no significant difference.

The results of consumption of g MS/kg of metabolic weight, feed conversion and consumption rate in the two stages, are shown in table 3, with no difference (p<0.05) in the first stage for the three variables. In the second stage there was a difference in the three variables under study (p<0.01), with higher values for consumption both in MS/kg PV0.75 and consumption rate; however, the best feed conversion was obtained with the sugarcane silage system.

With regard to the economic variables, feeding cost/d and feeding cost/kg, these were different (p<0.001), noting that the sugarcane silage system showed the lowest feeding costs in the two stages evaluated, having as result that the use of SCS may have the same parameters as the use of CS, but it is more profitable economically.

DISCUSSION

The use of sugarcane silage plus a strategic supplement makes it possible to obtain an economically competitive scheme in the development of heifers as future replacements in dairy farming, when compared to the traditional feeding with corn silage. Even considering that at the end of the observation period (470 days), the corn silage system was superior in WH and BC, these results can be attributed to the quality of the base ration, since the energy value calculated for sugarcane silage was lower when compared with corn silage and with a higher content of the acid detergent fiber fraction, which would make the fiber consumed less available, in addition to increased consumption, as it was higher by 1.6 kg MS/d. On the other hand, given the durability and performance of the biomass of sugarcane crops it is possible to increase the number of heifers to be developed with sugarcane silage.

In the productive aspect, both silage strategies are within the recommendations of different authors of not exceeding weight gains from 0.700 to 0.800 kg/d in the prepubertal stage (1,13). This rules out the negative effect on prepubertal animals with high nutritiona l levels of the development of the mammary gland (greasing) and consequently on the milk production (14,15). However, the improvement in the body condition with corn silage could be possibly attributed to a higher greasing, which resulted 27% higher than the sugarcane silage system and the corn silage treatment was superior to the recommendations of a BC of 2.4 at seven months of age, of 2.8 at 11 months and 3.0 at 16 months, compared to 2.9, 3.3 and 3.6 for the CS system, and 2.6, 2.6 and 3.1 for SCS respectively. In this context, it can be explained that the energy supplied in excess of the requirements mainly impacted the body condition (16,17).

Osnaya (18), reports that when working on the development of replacements for Holstein cattle with three feeding strategies: grazing, grazing plus supplementation and intensive system, DWG were 0.508, 0.694 and 0.560 kg, respectively. In this sense, when comparing the results of the sugarcane silage system with tropical pastures, these resulted in higher returns than those indicated by Plaza et al (19), as these authors found DWG ranges from 0.496 to 0.563 kg/d for the rainy season and from 0.395 to 0.455 kg/d during the dry season, when using bermuda grass (Cynodon dactylon var. 68) with Holstein heifers of 90 days of age and 88 kg of initial live weight. Similarly, the work of Zamora et al (20), in grazing (Cynodon nlemfuensis) and supplementation obtained a DWG of 0.584 kg/d in this stage of the development of Holstein heifers. Plazas and González (21) found results superior to this work when comparing two breeding systems for replacement Holstein heifers; feedlot and grazing from birth to six months of age, using two feeding treatments based on Kikuyu grass (Pennisetum clandestinim), corn silage and concentrate, and milk until three months of age, reporting values of 1.004 and 0.974 kg/d.

In this context, the possibility of implementing sugarcane silage feeding in growing animals is attractive, since it would have a greater impact on the drought period. Likewise, the consumption of MS was similar to that reported for Holstein heifers with different body weights (22). Therefore, one possibility of increasing consumption with this type of strategy is through the improvement of the fodder characteristics of sugarcane or the increase of the contribution of the supplement.

The SCS system proved to be more economical in 13%, as compared with the CS system, which means savings in feeding and therefore in the production of replacement heifers, reducing costs in 16.8% in the first stage (prior to weaning) and up to 18% in the second phase of this study, this is the result of the use of fodder crops adapted to local conditions and with high productivity as it is the case of sugarcane silage.

In conclusion the corn silage system produces a higher body condition, related to greasing, thereby affecting reproductive efficiency. An alternative for the development of Holstein-Friesian heifers was generated using a system based on sugarcane silage and slow-consumption supplement for replacement females from weaning until gestation for the dairy industry.

REFERENCES

1. Vetharaniam I, Davis SR, Upsdell M. Modeling the effect of energy status on mammary gland growth and lactation. J Dairy Sci 2003; 86:3148-3156.         [ Links ]

2. Schingoethe DJ, García A. Alimentación y manejo de becerras y vaquillas lecheras. ExEx [en línea] 2004 [acceso 25 de julio de 2013]; ExEx4020S. URL disponible en: http://pubstorage.sdstate.edu/AgBio_Publications/articles/ExEx4020S.pdf.         [ Links ]

3. Silveira PE, Franco FR. Conservación de forrajes: Segunda parte. REDVET [en línea] 2006; [acceso 25 de julio de 2013]; 7(11). URL disponible en: http://www.veterinaria.org/revistas/redvet/n111106/110605.pdf        [ Links ]

4. Santos MV, Gomez CA, Perea JP, García A, Guim A, Perez HM. Fatores que afetam o valor nutritivo da silagens de forrageiras tropicais. Arch Zootec 2010; 59:25-43.         [ Links ]

5. Martín PC. La alimentación del ganado vacuno con caña de azúcar y sus subproductos. La Habana, Cuba: EDICA (Editorial del Instituto de Ciencia Animal); 2004.         [ Links ]

6. Juárez LF, Vilaboa AJ, Díaz RP. La caña de azúcar (Saccharum officinarum): una alternativa para la sustitución de maíz (Zea mays) en la alimentación de bovinos de engorda. Sitio Argentino de Producción Animal [en línea] 2009 [acceso 25 de julio de 2013]; URL disponible en: http://www.produccion-animal.com.ar/informacion_tecnica/invernada_o_engorde_a_corral_o_feedlot/69-cana_azucar.pdf        [ Links ]

7. Pardo NA. Manual de Nutrición Animal. Colombia: Editorial Grupo Latino; 2007.         [ Links ]

8. Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía (INEGI). Anuario estadístico del estado de Jalisco. México: [en línea] 2010. [fecha de acceso 20 de noviembre de 2013] URL disponible en: http://www3.inegi.org.mx/sistemas/mexicocifras/default.aspx?e=14        [ Links ]

9. Edmonson AJ, Lean IJ, Weaver LD, Farver T, Webster G. A body condition scoring chart for Holstein dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 1989; 72:68-78.         [ Links ]

10. AOAC. Official Methods of Analysis (18th) Association of Official Analytical Chemists. Arligton (VA), Washington DC: AOAC; 2006.         [ Links ]

11. Martín PC, Palma JM. Manual para fincas y ranchos ganaderos. Colima, México: AgroSystems Editing; 1999.         [ Links ]

12. SAS. User guide: statics. Versión 8.0 Edition. Cary (NC): SAS institute Inc; 2009.         [ Links ]

13. Gabler MT, Heinrichs AJ. Dietary protein to metabolizable energy rations on feed efficiency and structural growth of prepubertal Holstein heifers. J Dairy Sci 2003; 86:268-274.         [ Links ]

14. Daniels KM, McGillard ML, Boyle PL, Meyer MJ, Van Amburgh ME, Capuco AV, et al. Effect of increasing energy and protein intake on mammary development in heifer calves. J Dairy Sci 2005; 88:595-603.         [ Links ]

15. Meyer MJ, Capuco AV, Ross DA, Lintault LM, Van Amburgh ME. Developmental and nutritional regulation of the prepubertal heifer mammary gland: I. Parenchyma and fat pad mass and composition. J Dairy Sci 2006; 89:4289-4297.         [ Links ]

16. Pedroso AD, Nussio LG, Paziani SDF, Loures DRS, Igarasi MS, Coelho RM, et al. Fermentation and epiphytic microflora dynamics in sugar cane silage. Sci Agric 2005; 62:427-432.         [ Links ]

17. Suksombat W, Junpanichcharoen P. Feeding of sugar cane silage to dairy cattle during the dry season. Asian-Aust J Anim Sci 2005; 18:1125-1129.         [ Links ]

18. Osnaya GF. Efecto del sistema de pastoreo rotacional en la crianza de vaquillas Holstein-Friesian sobre la eficiencia reproductiva. [Tesis Doctoral]. Colima, México: Universidad de Colima; 2000.         [ Links ]

19. Plaza J, Martínez X, Ybalmea R, Enriquez V. Vermisol o la urea para el control parasitario de terneras en pastos tropicales. Rev Cub Cienc Agric 2000; 34:293-297.         [ Links ]

20. Zamora A, Plaza J, Lara A. Nota acerca de un sistema de alimentación y manejo de novillas lecheras. Rev Cub Cienc Agríc 2000; 34:119-123.         [ Links ]

21. Plazas R, y González M. Comparación de dos sistemas de cría de terneras Holstein, pastoreo y estabulación en la finca Villa María municipio Firavitoba - Boyacá. Conexión Agropecuaria 2012; 2:15-24.         [ Links ]

22. NRC. Nutrient Requirements of Dairy Cattle. 7th Revised Edition. Washington DC: National Academy Press; 2007.         [ Links ]