SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.22 issue3Antimicrobial resistance in E. coli and Salmonella spp. isolates from calves in southern ChileCorrelation between ruminal pH and body condition score in cows with subacute ruminal acidosis author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


Revista MVZ Córdoba

Print version ISSN 0122-0268

Rev.MVZ Cordoba vol.22 no.3 Córdoba Sep./Dec. 2017

https://doi.org/10.21897/rmvz.1126 

Originales

Determination of effects of some pelletted straws on rumen pH and temperatures with wireless rumen sensors

Determinación de los efectos de algunas pastillas peletizadas en el rumen pH y temperaturas con sensores de rumen inalámbricos

Unal Kilic, Ph.D1  * 

Ali Vaiz Garipoglu, Ph.D1 

Emre Gulecyuz, M.Sc1 

Hasan Onder, Ph.D1 

1 Ondokuz Mayis University, Faculty of Agriculture, Department of Animal Science, Samsun Turkey.


ABSTRACT

Objective.

This study was conducted with the aim of determination of the effects of pellets prepared with addition of different additives (molasses, guar meal and sepiolite) on changes in in vitro rumen pH and temperature.

Materials and methods.

In the current study sixteen pelleted feeds were prepared with wheat and soybean straws. The Daisy incubator was used for maintaining (mimicing) rumen conditions and feed was incubated for 48 hours. The wireless rumen sensors were used for determination of the changes in in vitro rumen pH and temperature. The data were subjected to one way variance analysis.

Results.

The tested boluses were found to show similar temperature and pH measurements to digital pH metre measurements. The effect of sepiolite addition on pH and temperature was found insignificant in all treatments. The lowest pH value was determined for wheat straws. Control groups and molasses added in soybean straws and wheat straws were similar in terms of ruminal pH values. Guar meal and guar meal+molasses added in soybean straws was shown to increase pH (p<0.01). In vitro rumen temperatures in soybean straws were found lower compared to those in wheat straws in all treatments (p<0.001).

Conclusions.

It was concluded that boluses integrated to Daisy incubator can be safely used for determining the effects of feeds on rumen fermentation in in vitro studies.

Keywords: Boluses; forage; in vitro; guar meal; animal nutrition; sepiolite (Source: CAB)

RESUMEN

Objetivo

. Este estudio se realizó con el fin de determinar los efectos de los pellets preparados con adición de diferentes aditivos (melaza, harina de guar y sepiolita) sobre los cambios en el pH y temperatura in vitro del rumen.

Materiales y métodos.

En este estudio, se prepararon dieciséis alimentos peletizados con pajas de trigo y soya. La incubadora Daisy se usó para mantener (imitar) las condiciones del rumen y la alimentación se incubó durante 48 horas. Los sensores de rumen inalámbricos se usaron para la determinación de los cambios en el pH y la temperatura in vitro del rumen. Los datos fueron sometidos a análisis de varianza de una vía.

Resultados.

Se encontró que los bolos evaluados muestran mediciones de temperatura y pH similares a las mediciones del medidor de pH digital. El efecto de la adición de sepiolita sobre el pH y la temperatura fue insignificante en todos los tratamientos. El valor de pH más bajo se determinó para pajas de trigo. La adición de grupos de control y melazas en pajas de soya y paja de trigo fue similar en términos de valores de pH ruminal. Se demostró que la adición de harina de guar y harina de guar + melazas en pajas de soya aumenta el pH (p <0.01). Las temperaturas in vitro del rumen en las pajuelas de soya fueron menores en comparación con las pajas de trigo en todos los tratamientos (p <0.001).

Conclusiones.

Se concluyó que los bolos integrados a la incubadora Daisy se pueden utilizar de forma segura para determinar los efectos de los alimentos en la fermentación ruminal en estudios in vitro.

Palabras clave: Bolos; forraje; in vitro; harina de guar; nutrición animal; sepiolita (Fuente: CAB)

INTRODUCTION

With advancing technology, new approaches came into question in the field of animal nutrition. Use of wireless sensors is one of these new approaches. Recently, some studies are being conducted with the aim of determining the possibilities of using wireless rumen sensors (WRS=Bolus).

By using WRSs, some rumen parameters (pH, temperature and pressure) can be recorded continuously and with this way some data related to rumen fermentation can be obtained instantly. So, some nutrition related disorders can be determined in time 1-4. Furthermore, use of WRSs makes possible to add feeds which improve rumen health into ration. It is also thought that some remarkable achievements can be attained in prevention of subacut rumen acidosis (SARA) in ruminants 3,5-7. Besides, some valuable information related to bloat, animal welfare, mastitis, calving time, drinking behaviour, satiety and rumen-intestine movements can be obtained by using WSRs.

The lack of adequate studies on use of WRSs in ruminant nutrition decreases the reliability of obtained data. The reliable results obtained in limited studies 3,6,8,9, but not in other studies 6. Use of WSRs in animal nutrition experiments and on-farm studies is not common.

In the present study, it was aimed to determine the possibilities of using WRSs in integration with Daisy Incubator with the aim of determining the effects of straws pelleted with different additives on rumen fermentation. Furthermore, the hypothesis of the study was that while molasses and sepiolite addition to straws decreases rumen pH, guar meal addition increases rumen pH.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Wireless rumen sensors. In the study, 5 WRSs (e-Cow) (Weight: 154.4 g; Length: 13.0 cm; Width: 2.71 cm) which were produced for use in scientific studies (cannulated animals), also, a receiver and a mobil vehicle, in which required software was recorded, were purchased from U.K. The battery life of boluses and optimum working temperatures of boluses were 90-150 days and 34-40°C, respectively. The boluses have a data storage capacity for 28 days. Each bolus was labeled with a different label (ID).

Rumen fluid collection. Rumen fluid collected from Simmental- breed cow (18 months age) with a developed rumen, slaughtered at a private salaughter house with a developed rumen was filtered through two layers of cheesecloth and then was brought to the laboratory in thermos (38-40°C). The pH value of rumen fluid was determined using digital pH meter (Hanna Instruments 1332) with 3 replications. The average rumen pH was determined as 6.15 (6.08-6.51). Ethics approval is not required in this study because, rumen fluid was collected from slaughterhouse.

Preparation of straw pellets and experimental design. Wheat and soybean straws were used as feed material in the study. Eight experimental groups (2 sepiolite applications (+ and -) and 4 different feed groups (control, guar meal, molasses and guar meal+molasses)) were formed for each straw. The application rates for sepiolite, molasses, guar meal and guar meal+molasses were 2, 7, 10 and 17%, respectively. These additives were mixed with straw and then 6 mm-sized pellets were prepared.

Chemical analyses of straw pellets. The samples were milled to pass through a 1 mm sieve before chemical analyses. The ground samples were analyzed for Kjeldahl nitrojen (N) and crude protein (CP) was calculated by multiplying N by 6.25. Dry matter (DM) and ash were determined according to AOAC 10. The neutral detergent fiber (NDF), acid detergent fiber (ADF), acid detergent lignin (ADL) and crude fiber (CF) analysis were done according to the method of Van Soest et al 11 using ANKOM 2000 semi-automated fiber analyzer (Ankom Technology). Ether extract (EE) was determined according to AOCS 12 Am-5-04 procedures by using ANKOM analyzer. The contents of nitrogen free extract (NFE) of sample straws were determined by calculation.

Determination of changes in vitro rumen pH and temperatures. The study was conducted between December 30, 2015 and January, 1 2016. Two liters of incubation fluid (1600 ml buffer solution+400 ml rumen fluid) were added to each of 4 jars in Daisy incubator. The bags filled with samples were incubated in the jars with purging CO2 for 48 hours at 39°C. The pH and temperature values for each treatment in wheat and soybean straws were determined by using WRSs inserted in each jar for 48 hours. The boluses were adjusted for one measurement per 15 minutes as reported by Hanusovsky et al 13. Prior to use, each bolus was calibrated for pH 4 and pH 7 via mobil vehicle, which contains software, and computer and then data flow was monitored at least for 20 minutes. The pH and temperature measurements of boluses were tested by using a digital pH meter (Hanna Instruments 1332). The boluses were stored in water bath (38°C) until use. The boluses were inserted in jars of Daisy incubator at the same time. Data were transferred from boluses to mobil vehicle for 6 hour intervals.

Statistical Analyses. Data related to in vitro rumen pH and temperatures were subjected to one way analysis of variance and Duncan test was used for the mean comparisons.

RESULTS

Chemical compositions of straw pellets. The nutrient contents and cell wall contents of the straw pellets are given in Table 1. Soybean straw had higher CF and CP contents compared to wheat straw (p<0.001). Furthermore, it is seen that use of additives lead to changes in nutrient composition of straw pellets. Thus, CP contents of pelleted straws increased due to use of guar meal. Soybean straws are shown to have higher ADL contents than wheat straws.

Table 1 Nutrient contents of feeds used in the experiment,% 

Samples DM Ash CP EE CF NFE NDF ADF ADL
Wheat Cont- 90.46 ±0.06e 7.57 ±0.28de 4.19 ±0.00e 0.56 ±0.09 38.51 ±0.66de 39.63 ±0.87a 69.36 ±0.41b 42.42 ±0.41def 4.77 ±0.18e
Wheat Cont+ 91.44 ±0.01c 7.47 ±0.31de 3.54 ±0.06e 0.67 ±0.35 38.91 ±0.93cde 40.85 ±1.36a 72.49 ±0.72a 43.48 ±0.46cde 5.48 ±0.60e
Wheat M- 88.90 ±0.05g 8.19 ±0.22cd 6.16 ±0.05d 1.25 ±0.31 40.47 ±0.91b-e 32.84 ±1.05cd 68.05 ±0.51bc 42.16 ±0.22def 6.20 ±0.28e
Wheat M+ 87.84 ±0.07i 9.56 ±0.28b 4.46 ±1.62e 0.89 ±0.33 38.19 ±2.88de 34.75 ±1.11bc 66.13 ±0.56cd 40.46 ±0.42f 5.47 ±0.54e
Wheat G- 91.84 ±0.03b 6.92 ±0.15ef 6.26 ±0.11d 0.79 ±0.22 39.32 ±1.72b-e 38.54 ±1.72ab 69.48 ±0.44b 42.01 ±0.69ef 4.90 ±0.40e
Wheat G+ 92.35 ±0.01a 8.65 ±0.27c 6.63 ±0.10d 0.33 ±0.14 38.06 ±2.05de 38.68 ±1.76ab 69.16 ±0.41b 42.03 ±0.14ef 4.96 ±0.42e
Wheat GM- 88.50 ±0.10h 7.55 ±0.29de 10.44 ±0.19a 0.78 ±0.26 36.30 ±1.67e 33.43 ±1.83cd 65.44 ±0.28d 40.44 ±0.23f 5.16 ±0.07e
Wheat GM+ 87.65 ±0.19i 8.59 ±0.41c 8.73 ±0.15bc 0.62 ±0.12 38.04 ±2.43de 31.67 ±2.63cde 64.76 ±0.63d 39.76 ±0.31f 4.82 ±0.33e
Soybean Cont- 88.76 ±0.12g 7.57 ±0.30de 7.46 ±0.17cd 0.58 ±0.05 43.91 ±1.38abc 29.24 ±1.45def 66.59 ±0.44cd 52.22 ±0.80a 14.27 ±0.45a
Soybean Cont+ 90.91 ±0.05d 7.61 ±0.46de 4.17 ±0.01e 0.77 ±0.14 47.47 ±1.23a 30.88 ±0.73cde 65.90 ±0.03d 52.15 ±0.40a 11.55 ±0.18cd
Soybean M- 84.68 ±0.12l 10.04 ±0.20b 6.95 ±0.03d 0.51 ±0.43 42.69 ±1.28a-d 24.50 ±0.54fg 59.40 ±1.02e 45.65 ±1.23bc 13.44 ±0.12ab
Soybean M+ 85.84 ±0.09k 12.65 ±0.29a 6.91 ±0.21d 0.47 ±0.11 38.70 ±1.34cde 27.13 ±1.25ef 56.87 ±0.37f 45.97 ±2.06bc 11.93 ±1.14bc
Soybean G- 90.20 ±0.12f 13.34 ±0.19a 10.08 ±0.44ab 0.71 ±0.32 35.56 ±0.82e 30.51 ±1.01cde 52.80 ±0.59g 40.86 ±0.88ef 10.93 ±0.34cd
Soybean G+ 90.13 ±0.03f 12.94 ±0.22a 9.48 ±0.07ab 0.24 ±0.04 39.62 ±1.53b-e 27.85 ±1.72ef 56.35 ±1.37f 42.30 ±0.85def 10.27 ±0.14d
Soybean GM- 84.01 ±0.09m 6.38 ±0.38f 10.69 ±0.64a 0.69 ±0.37 44.2 ±1.09ab 22.00 ±1.64g 60.37 ±0.85e 47.27 ±0.49b 12.34 ±0.47bc
Soybean GM+ 86.87 ±0.06j 12.68 ±0.19a 9.42 ±0.03ab 0.62 ±0.28 42.6 ±2.00a-d 21.52 ±2.14g 59.12 ±0.73e 44.77 ±1.10bcd 12.10 ±0.77bc
Significant <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 0.622 0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
DM: Dry matter, CP: Crude protein, EE:Ether extract, CF: Crude fiber, NFE: Nitrogen free extracts, NDF: Neutral detergent fiber, ADF: Acid detergent fiber, ADL: Acid detergent lignin; Wheat Cont-: wheat control, Wheat Cont+: wheat control with sepiolite, Wheat M-:wheat molasses, Wheat M+: wheat molasses with sepiolite, Wheat G-: wheat guar meal, Wheat G+: wheat guar meal with sepiolite, Wheat GM-: wheat guar meal+molasses, Wheat GM+: wheat guar meal+molasses with sepiolite, Soybean Cont-: soybean control, Soybean Cont+: soybean control with sepiolite, Soybean M-:soybean molasses, Soybean M+: soybean molasses with sepiolite, Soybean G-: soybean guar meal, Soybean G+: soybean guar meal with sepiolite, Soybean GM-: soybean guar meal+molasses, Soybean GM+: soybean guar meal+molasses with sepiolite

Determination of changes in vitro pH and temperature using wireless rumen sensors. The pH and temperature measurements of boluses were tested (Table 2) by using a digital pH meter. The pH and temperature values measured by using boluses were found similar to those measured by using digital pH meter. However, one (5 number bolus) of the boluses was not used in in vitro study due to calibration problems.

Table 2 Test results of wireless rumen sensors* 

Measurement Bolus 1 Bolus 2 Bolus 3 Bolus 4 Bolus 5 pH meter
Temperature, °C 37.5-37.5 37.5-37.6 37.5-37.6 37.5-37.5 37.5-37.6 37.5-37.6
pH (4.0) 4.02-4.05 4.02-4.06 4.01-4.04 4.03-4.05 4.03-4.10 4.01-4.03
pH (7.0) 7.01-7.05 7.01-7.03 7.00-7.02 7.01-7.03 7.02-7.07 7.01-7.03
pH (10.0) 10.01-10.04 9.98-10.03 10.00-10.02 10.01-10.04 9.99-10.07 10.01-10.03
* Five synchronous measurements were made and the lowest and highest values (minimum-maximum) were given.

In vitro rumen pH and temperature data (total 192 measurements) were regularly transferred for 48 hours (incubation period). As expected, the pH values decreased with time. The initial pH value (7.71) was continuously decreased to lower value (6.33) after 48 hours. The same trend occurred in all boluses. The temperatures were determined between 38.7 and 38.8°C. However, the same trend can not be expected in living animals due to the fact that animals drink water and also ruminate continuously and so rumen is continuously buffered.

Added groups. In vitro rumen temperatures were lower for soybean straws compared to those for wheat straws (p<0.001). However, sepiolite addition did not affect rumen pH in all treatments for each straw. The lowest rumen temperatures were determined for guar meal added and guar meal+molasses added wheat and soybean straws. This might be attributed to increase in rumen pH. The guar meal addition led to increase in in vitro rumen pH (Figure 1 and 2).

Figure 1 Temperature changes in guar meal added groups, °C 

Figure 2 Temperature changes in guar meal+molasses added groups, °C 

DISCUSSION

The chemical compositions of samples are in agreement with those of Wang et al 14 and Mohamoud Abdi 15. The sepiolite addition led to decrease in CP content of pelleted straws as reported by Gulecyuz 16.

Gaughan 3 compared the WRS with manual pH measurements and then he reported that ruminal pH values measuremented with WRS were between 5.48-5.77 in concentrates, 7.18-7.28 in hays and mixed feeds (hay/concentrates) were between 6.22-6.85. Phillips et al 6, reported that manual pH measurements (average 6.64) were similar to pH values (7.03) determined by using boluses. Dado and Allen 17, Penner et al 18, Penner et al 19 and Phillips et al 6, reported a high correlation (r2 =0.85-0.95) between manual pH measurements and those determined by using boluses. These findings are in agreement with our findings. However, it was reported that pH measurements by boluses might be differed at different hours of a day 3,13,20,21 and also that there might be significant differences between pH measurements determined manually and those determine by using boluses. These differences might be attributed to the differences in rumen fluid sampling techniques or standart pH meters 9.

The pH and temperature values for 48 hours incubation period are given in Table 3 and Figure 1-8. Sepiolite addition did not affect pH in all treatments. Wheat straws showed lowest ruminal pH value. Control groups and molasses added soybean straws and wheat straws were similar in terms of in vitro rumen pH values (Figure 3-6). Guar meal and guar meal+molasses addition increased pH value in soybean straws. This might be caused by addition of guar meal which is a high protein source. Proteinous feeds (compounds) increase rumen pH via their contribution in ruminal ammonia synthesis 22.

Figure 3 pH change in control groups 

Figure 4 pH change in molassed groups 

Figure 5 pH change in guar meal added groups 

Figure 6 pH change in guar meal+molasses added groups 

Figure 7 Temperature changes in control groups, °C 

Figure 8 Temperature changes in molassed groups, °C 

Table 3 Average in vitro pH and temperature changes for 48 hour incubation determined by using wireless rumen sensors 

Feed Average pH Min.-Max. pH Averagae temperature, °C
Wheat Cont- 6.40 ± 0.03d 6.24-7.67 39.23 ± 0.04a
Wheat Cont+ 6.40 ± 0.03d 6.26-7.66 39.24 ± 0.03a
Soybean Cont- 6.43 ± 0.03abcd 6.33-7.71 38.72 ± 0.01b
Soybean Cont+ 6.43 ± 0.03bcd 6.33-7.69 38.72 ± 0.01b
Wheat M- 6.39 ± 0.02d 6.30-7.39 39.19 ± 0.04a
Wheat M+ 6.38 ± 0.01d 6.30-6.69 39.18 ± 0.05a
Soybean M- 6.42 ± 0.02cd 6.33-7.39 38.73 ± 0.01b
Soybean M+ 6.42 ± 0.02cd 6.33-7.32 38.73 ± 0.01b
Wheat G- 6.40 ± 0.03d 6.30-7.59 38.56 ± 0.01c
Wheat G+ 6.40 ± 0.03d 6.30-7.58 38.58 ± 0.01c
Soybean G- 6.51 ± 0.02a 6.42-7.39 38.04 ± 0.03de
Soybean G+ w6.50 ± 0.02a 6.42-7.40 38.09 ± 0.02d
Wheat GM- 6.39 ± 0.02d 6.26-7.41 38.58 ± 0.02c
Wheat GM+ 6.38 ± 0.01d 6.27-6.68 38.56 ± 0.02c
Soybean GM- 6.50 ± 0.02ab 6.42-7.17 38.03 ± 0.01de
Soybean GM+ 6.49 ± 0.01abc 6.41-6.69 38.01 ± 0.01e
Significant <0.001 <0.001
Wheat Cont-: wheat control, Wheat Cont+: wheat control with sepiolite, Wheat M-:wheat molasses, Wheat M+: wheat molasses with sepiolite, Wheat G-: wheat guar meal, Wheat G+: wheat guar meal with sepiolite, Wheat GM-: wheat guar meal+molasses, Wheat GM+: wheat guar meal+molasses with sepiolite, Soybean Cont-: soybean control, Soybean Cont+: soybean control with sepiolite, Soybean M-:soybean molasses, Soybean M+: soybean molasses with sepiolite, Soybean G-: soybean guar meal, Soybean G+: soybean guar meal with sepiolite, Soybean GM-: soybean guar meal+molasses, Soybean GM+: soybean guar meal+molasses with sepiolite

The average pH value determined in present study was found higher than pH value reported by Desnoyers et al 9. This can be attributed to use of different feeds in the two studies. In the present study, use of forage led to increase in rumen pH. Castro-Costa et al 8, monitored the rumen temperature and pH changes in milk goats fed on different rations (70 and 50% forage) and under different climatic conditions (20-23°C and 30-37°C) by using boluses. The researchers found 0.31 unit higher pH values in goats fed on ration with higher forage content (70%) (6.56 vs 6.25) and 0.12 unit lower pH values in goats raised under high ambient temperature (30-37°C) (6.55 vs 6.43). The rumen temperature was found similar for two ration types (38.82°C for high forage ration and 38.92 °C for low forage ration), but it was higher (39.9°C) in goats raised under high temperature (30-37°C) compared to that (39.6°C) in goats raised under normal temperature (20-23°C). These researchers reported that boluses could give reliable results related to rumen pH and temperature and also that the water consumptions could be determined by increase in rumen pH. The average pH values determined in the present study (6.38 and 6.51) were found similar to those reported by Castro-Costa et al 8.

If the ruminal pH become less than 5.75, it will be subacut rumen acidosis 5. But there is no SARA problem in this study for using roughage. The lowest, highest and average rumen pH values in dairy cows were reported as 5.30, 7.39 and 6.28, respectively, by Hanušovský et al 13. Giger-Reverdin et al 23, reported pH values as 6.28 in goats fed on ration with 70:30 forage/concentrate ratio and as 5.96 in those fed on ration with 30:70 forage/concentrate ratio by using boluses. The researchers reported that there was SARA risks in goats fed on concentrate based diet. It seems that, use of rumen sensors has a big potential for diagnosing and preventing SARA. Castro-Costa et al 8, Wahrmund et al 24 and Loholter et al 21 reported that the rumen pH decreased and rumen temperature increased with increasing time after feeding. The same trend was observed in the present study.

Castro-Castro et al 8 determined rumen temperature as 38.9°C by using boluses and they reported that the different diets did not affect the rumen temperature. Alzahal et al 25 and Loholter et al 21 reported that high concentrate diets (40-65%) led to increase in rumen temperature. Heat, which is a by product of microbial fermentation, reaches the peak level more quickly in ruminants consuming high concentrate diets 26. Our findings related to this subject are in agreement with the previous studies.

In in vitro studies, the activities such as rumination and drinking water which strongly affect rumen pH are not taken into account. Therefore, in in vivo studies, ruminal pH value may increase at sometimes. Besides, it can change individual difference of animals 3. This can lead to erroneous pH measurements. In the present study, the data were obtained under controlled conditions. These data might be different from those obtained on live animals because, the locations (rumen, reticulum) at which boluses are located have significant effect on the obtained data 1,7,27. Thus, it is known that different pH values can be determined in rumen and reticulum compartments of an animal in the same day. It is also known that substantial changes can occur in reticulum temperature due to water consumption 4,8. Furthermore, rumen environmental conditions (bacteria colonization etc.) can lead to change in rumen pH. The diurnal ruminal pHs can differ from an animal to another 9. This fact indicates that the in vitro method used in the present study is a promising method due to its reliability and ease of application. Our findings show that the boluses can be integrated to the in vitro systems.

In the study, temperature controlled Daisy incubator was used and temperature change was not allowed. For this reason, the temperature data obtained in the present study were expected to be similar. The existence of differences in temperature data obtained in present study pointout that temperature measurements might be disputable.

In conclusion, it is expected that WRSs will have widespread use in near future. These sensors supply information related to the rumen conditions of experimental animals. The sensors which can adapt to many research programmes have an ease of application in rumen fistulated animals. Furthermore, they remove the need to collect rumen fluid 7. The present study showed that the pH and temperature data can be obtained at willed time intervals. Thus, it is possible to determine the effects of feeds and treatments on rumen fermentation by using the data obtained from the boluses. The short battery lifes (nearly 3-4 months) and high prices prevent common use of boluses. For this reason, further researches should be conducted for developing low-cost and long-lived boluses in future. Furthermore, it might be possible to determine the contents of volatile fatty acids, ammonia and methane in rumen by using boluses. More detailed in vitro and in vivo researches are needed in this topic.

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by TUBITAK (TOVAG 1150912).

REFERENCES

1. Mottram T, Lowe J, McGowan M, Phillips N. Technical note: A wireless telemetric method of monitoring clinical acidosis in dairy cows. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 2008; 64(1):45-48. [ Links ]

2. AlZahal O, Kebreab E, France J, Froetschel M, McBride BW. Ruminal temperature may aid in the detection of subacute ruminal acidosis. J Dairy Sci 2008; 91(1):202-207. [ Links ]

3. Gaughan J. Report to Kahne Limited, Evaluation of the KB1000 Series Bolus. School of Animal Studies, The University of Queensland: Gatton QLD, Australia; 2010. [ Links ]

4. Cruz G. The benefits, challenges and future of rumen pH sensors. (Accessed date: 17.03.2015). 2014. URL Available in: Available in: http://www.progressivecattle.com/topics/herd-health/6485-the-benefits-challenges-and-future-of-rumen-ph-sensors . [ Links ]

5. Atkinson O. Prevalence of subacute ruminal acidosis (SARA) on UK dairy farms. Cattle Practice 2014; 22(1):1-9. [ Links ]

6. Phillips N, Mottram T, Poppi D, Mayer D, McGowan M.R. Continuous monitoring of ruminal pH using wireless telemetry. Animal Production Science 2010; 50:72-77. [ Links ]

7. Kilic U. Usage of Wireless Rumen Sensors in Ruminant Nutrition and Scientific Research. Yem Magazine Journal 2016; 24(75):31-44. [ Links ]

8. Castro-Costa A, Salama AA, Moll X, Aguiló J, Caja G. Using wireless rumen sensors for evaluating the effects of diet and ambient temperature in nonlactating dairy goats. J Dairy Sci 2015; 98(7):4646-58. [ Links ]

9. Desnoyers M, Giger-Reverdin S, Sauvant D, Duvaux-Ponter C. The use of a multivariate analysis to study between-goat variability in feeding behavior and associated rumen pH patterns. Journal of dairy science 2011; 94(2):842-852. [ Links ]

10. AOAC. Officinal Methods of Analysis. 16th Edition, AOAC International, Gaithersburg, MD. 1998. [ Links ]

11. Van Soest PJ, Robertson JB, Levis BA. Method for Dietary Fiber, Neutral Detergent Fiber, and Nonstarch Polysaccharides in Relation to Animal Nutrition. J Dairy Sci 1991; 74:3583-3597. [ Links ]

12. AOCS. Official procedure, approved procedure Am 5-04, Rapid determination of oil/fat utilizing high temperature solvent extraction. American Oil Chemists Society, Urbana, IL. 2005. [ Links ]

13. Hanušovský O, Bíro D, Šimko M, Gálik B, Juráček M, Rolinec M, Majlát M, Herkeľ R. Continual monitoring of reticulorumenal pH of dairy cows during 45 days. Acta Fytotechn Zootechn 2015; 18(3):53-55. [ Links ]

14. Wang C, Song E, Wang Z, Liu X, Nian H, Zhang J. Variations in the nutritive value of soybean straw and their use with agronomic traits for breeding assays. J Animal & Plant Sci 2014; 22(1):3399-3406. [ Links ]

15. Mohamoud Abdi A. Effect of lignin peroxidase enzyme on feed values of different straws. [MSc Thesis]. Ondokuz Mayis University, Sci. Enstitute, Samsun-Turkey 2016. [ Links ]

16. Gülecyüz E. Determining in vitro digestibility and methane production of wheat straw and soybean straw pelleted with different additives. [MSc Thesis]. Ondokuz Mayıs University, Sci. Enstitute, Samsun-Turkey 2016. [ Links ]

17. Dado RG, Allen MS. Continuous computer acquisition of feed and water intakes, chewing, reticular motility, and ruminal pH of cattle. J Dairy Sci 1993; 76:1589-1600. [ Links ]

18. Penner GB, Beauchemin KA, Mutsvangwa T. An evaluation of the accuracy and precision of a stand-alone submersible continuous ruminal pH measurement system. J Dairy Sci 2006; 89:2132-2140. [ Links ]

19. Penner GB, Aschenbach JR, Gäbel G, Oba M. Technical note: Evaluation of a continuous ruminal pH measurement system for use in noncannulated small ruminants. Anim Sci 2009; 87:2363-2366. [ Links ]

20. Kaur R, Garcia SC, Horadagoda A, Fulkerson WJ. Evaluation of rumen probe for continuous monitoring of rumen pH, temperature and pressure. Anim Prod Sci 2010; 50:98-104. [ Links ]

21. Lohölter M, Rehage R, Meyer U, Lebzien P, Rehage J, Dänicke S. Evaluation of a device for continuous measurement of rumen pH and temperature considering localization of measurement and dietary concentrate proportion. Landbauforsch Appl Agric Forestry Res 2013; 63:61-68. [ Links ]

22. Felix TL, Murphy TA, Loerch SC. Effects of dietary inclusion and NaOH treatment of dried distillers grains with solubles on ruminal metabolism of feedlot cattle1. J Anim Sci 2012; 90:4951-4961. [ Links ]

23. Giger-Reverdin SK, Rigalma M, Desnoyers D, Sauvant C, Duvaux-Ponter. Effect of concentrate level on feeding behavior and rumen and blood parameters in dairy goats: Relationships between behavioral and physiological parameters and effect of between-animal variability. J Dairy Sci 2014; 97:4367-4378. [ Links ]

24. Wahrmund JL, Ronchesel JR, Krehbiel CR, Goad CL, Trost SM, Richard CJ. Ruminal acidosis challenge impact on ruminal temperature in feedlot cattle. J Anim Sci 2012; 90:2794-2801. [ Links ]

25. AlZahal O, AlZahal H, Steele MA, Van Schaik M, Kyriazakis I, Duffield TF, McBride BW. The use of a radiotelemetric ruminal bolus to detect body temperature changes in lactating dairy cattle. J Dairy Sci 2011; 94:3568-3574. [ Links ]

26. Hungate RE. The Rumen and its Microbes. Academic Press Inc.; New York, NY: 1996. [ Links ]

27. Kilic U. Use of Wireless Rumen Sensors in Ruminant Nutrition Research. Asian J Anim Sci 2011; 5(1):46-55. [ Links ]

Received: January 2017; Accepted: April 2017

* Correspondance: unalk@omu.edu.tr

Creative Commons License This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License