SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
 issue41Legal argumentation and judicial decision making: Empirical evidence from EcuadorSpecial education as a trap: Detours and mazes in ensuring the right to inclusive education for persons with disabilities author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


Revista Derecho del Estado

Print version ISSN 0122-9893

Abstract

CLERICO, Laura. Towards an integral analysis of stereotypes: Challenging the standard guarantee of impartiality. Rev. Derecho Estado [online]. 2018, n.41, pp.67-96. ISSN 0122-9893.  https://doi.org/10.18601/01229893.n41.03.

The use of stereotypes to the detriment of the discriminated group should imply questioning the standard guarantee of judicial impartiality. Even taking the analysis of stereotypes seriously, the depth of its consequences has not been sufficiently taken into account in the constitutional and human rights argumentation because it has not challenged with all intensity the standard way in which the guarantee of impartiality is conceived and applied in legal practice and even by the regional court for the protection of human rights. I will defend two central theses: (1) the use of stereotypes necessarily impacts on the analysis of the guarantee of impartiality and (2) impartiality must get rid of the presumption of impartiality.

Keywords : stereotypes; structural inequality; impartiality; gender; argumentation in constitutional law and human rights.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in Spanish     · Spanish ( pdf )