SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.12 issue1Study on the congestion within the administrative jurisdictionObligatory and non-derogable rule to recognize and guarantee human rights is binding of the constituent power of the state author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


Estudios Socio-Jurídicos

Print version ISSN 0124-0579

Abstract

MONTANEZ-RUIZ, Julio-César. The debate over the expansion of criminal law: between punishing the upper classes v. avoiding excessive application of the law. Estud. Socio-Juríd [online]. 2010, vol.12, n.1, pp.285-304. ISSN 0124-0579.

The public debate on the question of: which social conflicts should be punished from a perspective of criminal policy, still continues. The attempts to impose criminality on particular acts come within a framework by which criminalization is determined by legislators who reflect punitive expansion. The objective of this paper is to discuss the struggle between criminalization models which options, on one hand, tend to the enforcement through the criminal system by persecuting criminality of powerful, and on the other hand, seek standards of minimum intervention so as to avoid excessive application of criminal law.

Keywords : criminal policy; criminality of powerful; minimum criminal law.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in Spanish     · Spanish ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License