SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.52 issue2Abdominal and thoracic wall closure: damage control surgery’s cinderellaDamage control approach to refractory neurogenic shock: a new proposal to a well-established algorithm author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


Colombia Médica

On-line version ISSN 1657-9534

Abstract

MEJIA, David et al. Reinterventions after damage control surgery. Colomb. Med. [online]. 2021, vol.52, n.2, e4154805.  Epub June 30, 2021. ISSN 1657-9534.  https://doi.org/10.25100/cm.v52i2.4805.

Damage control has well-defined steps. However, there are still controversies regarding whom, when, and how re-interventions should be performed. This article summarizes the Trauma and Emergency Surgery Group (CTE) Cali-Colombia recommendations about the specific situations concerning second interventions of patients undergoing damage control surgery. We suggest packing as the preferred bleeding control strategy, followed by unpacking within the next 48-72 hours. In addition, a deferred anastomosis is recommended for correction of intestinal lesions, and patients treated with vascular shunts should be re-intervened within 24 hours for definitive management. Furthermore, abdominal or thoracic wall closure should be attempted within eight days. These strategies aim to decrease complications, morbidity, and mortality.

Keywords : Laparotomy; ostomy; thoracic cavity; anastomosis surgical; postoperative period; cardiac surgical procedures; intensive care units; surgical wound infection; colostomy; abdominal wall; reoperation; intra-abdominal hypertension.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in English | Spanish     · English ( pdf ) | Spanish ( pdf )