SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
 issue26RULES FOR OFFLINE AND ONLINE IN DETERMINING INTERNET JURISDICTION. GLOBAL OVERVIEW AND COLOMBIAN CASESTHE BIRTH OF MODERN COMPARATIVE LAW AS A GEOGRAPHIC SPACE AND A DISCIPLINE: BASIC INSTR UCTIONS FOR ITS USE AND UNDERSTANDING FROM LATIN AMERICA author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


International Law

Print version ISSN 1692-8156

Abstract

BOHOSLAVSKY, Juan Pablo; MARTIN, Líber  and  JUSTO, Juan. THE STATE DUTY TO PROTECT FROM BUSINESS-RELATED HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS IN WATER AND SANITATION SERVICES: REGULATORY AND BITS IMPLICATIONS. Int. Law: Rev. Colomb. Derecho Int. [online]. 2015, n.26, pp.63-116. ISSN 1692-8156.  https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.il15-26.sdpb.

The Human Right to Water and Sanitation -HRWS- has called primary attention since General Comment No. 15 (GC 15) -issued in 2002 by the UN Committee on Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights, CESCR- interpreted articles 11 and 12 of the International Covenant on Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights (ICESCR). Since then, much has been written on this human right, but very little on the existing linkage between it and private corporations providing public water and sanitation services (WSS), and even less on the regulatory and Bilateral Investment Treaties (BITs) implications of the state's duty to protect this right. This article will therefore study the state's duty to protect from business-related human rights violations in the specific field of WSS from two interrelated perspectives. On one hand, the domestic regulatory front, which raises questions such as: Should regulation of private water and sanitation companies be based on human rights standards? If so, to what extent? What are the concrete regulatory implications of the two previous responses? Has existing case law outlined minimum regulatory standards based on international human rights norms? On the other hand, in terms of international liability, the following que stions are crucial: How should we interpret BITs that protect foreign companies providing water and sanitation in light of the state's duty to protect from business-related human rights violations? How to reconcile the state's BITs commitments with its obligations under human rights treaties in WSS? Do we need to reconcile them at all?

Keywords : human right to water; state duty to protect; business-related human rights; BITs.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in English     · English ( pdf )