SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
 issue25La apuesta filosófica de Michel Foucaült por la altertdad: vlajes y periodismo como marco explicativo de las reflexiones en torno a la experiencia iraníPlatón y Damascio sobre los Placeres Del intelecto author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


Eidos

Print version ISSN 1692-8857On-line version ISSN 2011-7477

Abstract

VILLAR, Francisco. Los megáricos como sofistas erísticos: La respuesta pLatónica aL ataque de isócrates contra Los socráticos. Eidos [online]. 2016, n.25, pp.185-213. ISSN 1692-8857.  https://doi.org/10.14482/eidos.25.7341.

During the fourth century BC, Greek thinkers discussed about the limits and characteristics of philosophy in order to distinguish it from other practices. In this paper, I will focus on the portrait of sophists as diametrically opposed to philosophers. Specifically, I will discuss the platonic answer to the charge that Isocrates directed against all Socrates’ disciples in the treatises Against the Sophists and Encomium of Helen. I will defend that Plato’s strategy to avoid his critics was to develop, in the Euthydemus and the fifth definition of the Sophist, a character that combines the most significant attributes censured by Isocrates: the eristic sophist. I will argue that this figure does not refer to the Sophists of the fifth century BC., but to the Megaric group. They would have been those who, according to Plato, really deserved the Isocratic attack.

Keywords : Isocrates; Socratics; Eristic Sophist; Dialectic; Megarians.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in Spanish     · Spanish ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License