SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.6 issue1Vocal Load of University Professors: Preliminary ResultsAdaptation and Validation of the Voice Handicap Index and its Abbreviated Version to Rioplatense Spanish of Argentina author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


Revista de investigación e innovación en ciencias de la salud

On-line version ISSN 2665-2056

Abstract

VERDUYCKT, Ingrid; DEFOY, Lyne; HOCINE, Imane  and  MARTEL-SAUVAGEAU, Vincent. Outcomes of a Community of Practice on Quebec Speech Language Pathologists’ Voice Assessment Practices and Professional Identity. Rev. Investig. Innov. Cienc. Salud [online]. 2024, vol.6, n.1, pp.98-126.  Epub Jan 08, 2024. ISSN 2665-2056.  https://doi.org/10.46634/riics.254.

In a context where different protocols for recommended practices in clinical voice assessment exist, while there are gaps in the literature regarding the evidence base supporting assessment procedures and measures, clinicians from regions where a strong community holding expertise in clinical and scientific voice practices lack can struggle to confidently develop their voice assessment practices. In an effort to improve voice assessment practices and strengthen professional identity among speech-language pathologists in Quebec, Canada, a community of practice (CoP) was established, with the aim of promoting knowledge sharing, implementing change in clinical practice, and improving professional identity. Thirty-nine participants took part in the CoP activities conducted over a four-month period, including virtual meetings and in-person workshops. Participants had a high rate of attendance (> 74% participation rate in virtual meetings), and were highly satisfied with their participation and intended to remain involved after the project’s end. Statistically significant changes in voice assessment practices were observed post-CoP, regarding probability of performing assessments (p < .001), and perceived importance of assessment for evaluative purposes (p <.001), as well as improvements in assessment specific confidence, specifically for procedure of auditory-perceptual assessment (p < .001) and purpose of aerodynamic assessment (p = .05). Moreover, there was an increase in professional identity post-CoP (p < .001) and participants felt they made significant learnings. The present study highlighted the need to involve SLPs in future research to identify assessments that are relevant to the specific evaluative objectives of SLPs working with voice, and suggests CoPs are an efficient tool for that purpose.

Keywords : Speech language pathology; voice assessment; professional identity; evidence-based practice; community of practice.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in English     · English ( pdf )