SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.11 número5Sentimientos, sentidos y significados en pacientes de hospitales públicos en el noreste de BrasilEvaluación de la salud pública en algunos zoológicos de Colombia: Fase I: Diseño y validación de instrumentos índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • En proceso de indezaciónCitado por Google
  • No hay articulos similaresSimilares en SciELO
  • En proceso de indezaciónSimilares en Google

Compartir


Revista de Salud Pública

versión impresa ISSN 0124-0064

Resumen

CRUZ, Antonio M; PRESIGA-LUCENA, Ana M  y  RODRIGUEZ-CORTES, Isabel C. Measuring the Datum or Pugh method's efficiency for selecting biomedical technology. Rev. salud pública [online]. 2009, vol.11, n.5, pp.766-773. ISSN 0124-0064.

Objective Determining the Pugh multicriteria method's effectiveness as a selection tool when acquiring new technology. Materials and Methods The state of the art regarding multicriteria method use was studied; the Datum or Pugh method was selected. The size of the sample of experts participating in the trial was calculated and characterised; a data sample of 23 experts was thus obtained. Electrocardiography technology was selected by using the selected decision-making method; 5 models from different providers were used. Results 46 tests were conducted. The model labelled "3" was selected as referent in most cases, whilst the model labelled "5" was selected as being the best option in most cases. Conclusions The Pugh method was effective as a method for decision-making when selecting biomedical technologies as the same model was always selected by the experts as being the best option in 87% of the tests applied.

Palabras clave : Health facility acquisition; biomedical technology; decision-making support technique.

        · resumen en Español     · texto en Español     · Español ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License Todo el contenido de esta revista, excepto dónde está identificado, está bajo una Licencia Creative Commons