SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
 número28El otro cuya palabra puede transformarme. El papel de la alteridad en la hermenéutica de Gadamer.Lo que es por accidente y sus diversas causas en Metafísica E de Aristóteles índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • En proceso de indezaciónCitado por Google
  • No hay articulos similaresSimilares en SciELO
  • En proceso de indezaciónSimilares en Google

Compartir


Eidos

versión impresa ISSN 1692-8857versión On-line ISSN 2011-7477

Resumen

FIERRO, María Angélica. Sobre la naturaleza del Éros platónico: ¿daímon o theós?. Eidos [online]. 2018, n.28, pp.157-189. ISSN 1692-8857.

Although in the Symposium Plato describes Erôs as a daimôn-metaxy, i.e. as an intermediate and intermediary divinity between gods and men, in the Phaedrus it is said that Erôs is a theos -a god. I will try to show that these different descriptions do not imply a substantial change of mind but work as two complementary views about the true nature of Erôs. According to the Phaedrus, although erôs can remain just at a physical level and not develop its divine power, it is also possible that, thanks to the same intense, sexual desire for the beautiful boy, the lover recollects the Form of beauty and so grows divine Erôs`s wings. However, only the gods never lose their wings and so are in regular, full contact with the Forms. The human souls need to acquire the wings and even so take the risk of losing them; they are then in an intermediate state -metaxy- like Erôs in the Symposium.

Palabras clave : Erôs; daimôn; theos; metaxy; Phaedrus; Symposium.

        · resumen en Español     · texto en Español     · Español ( pdf )