SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.17 número30Revisión del concepto de grupo estratégico y propuesta de definición para aplicaciones en el ámbito colombianoLa participación de los cubanos, los colombianos y los chilenos en las redes del narcotráfico en Nueva York durante los años sesenta índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • En proceso de indezaciónCitado por Google
  • No hay articulos similaresSimilares en SciELO
  • En proceso de indezaciónSimilares en Google

Compartir


Innovar

versión impresa ISSN 0121-5051

Resumen

RIVAS TOVAR, Luis Arturo et al. Incentives and disincentives in public transport systems in London, Madrid and Mexico City. Innovar [online]. 2007, vol.17, n.30, pp.113-132. ISSN 0121-5051.

The present work deals with a study comparing public transport systems in the two European cities (London and Madrid) and the city of Mexico, evaluating three variables: incentives for using public transport, disincentives for using private transport and government public transport policy. This led to concluding that a clear strategy could be identified in the case of Madrid and London, as could the systematic application of policy providing incentives for using public transport and disincentives for private transport in their metropolitan areas in which zoning and coordinated action were highlighted, which did not prove consistent in the case of the city of Mexico. Public transport systems never compete with private transport when quality and providing service are not acceptable in terms of frequency, time spent travelling, comfort and reliable information, as these stimulate the use of public transport more than anything else. These was no single administrative agency for managing the whole public transport system in metropolitan areas (infrastructure, public transport, planning, tariffs and tax exemptions), meaning that coordinating and conciliating involved interest groups is fundamental for system efficiency. Managing public transport systems implies systematically and consistently applying a set of incentives for using public transport, disincentives for using private transport and government policy reconciling the interests of all groups so involved.

Palabras clave : Megalopolis; public transport; government policy; intelligent transport systems.

        · resumen en Español | Francés | Portugués     · texto en Español     · Español ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License Todo el contenido de esta revista, excepto dónde está identificado, está bajo una Licencia Creative Commons