SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.14 número23Subject and social práxisEnunciados de identidad, invariabilidad proposicional y estipulación contextual índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • En proceso de indezaciónCitado por Google
  • No hay articulos similaresSimilares en SciELO
  • En proceso de indezaciónSimilares en Google

Compartir


Discusiones Filosóficas

versión impresa ISSN 0124-6127

Resumen

FLOREZ Q, Daian Tatiana  y  GARCIA D, Carlos Emilio. Rationality and incontinent action: A possible explanation. discus.filos [online]. 2013, vol.14, n.23, pp.79-103. ISSN 0124-6127.

How is well known, the problem of akratic or incontinent actions; i.e., those actions characterized because the agent acts against his best judgement, has been of great interest for philosophers since the time of Socrates. In recent theories, like those advanced by Davidson and by Searle, this problem is examined on the basis of openly contrary claims. In this paper, we shall contrast the views of Searle and Davidson on akrasia. We shall suggest that though Searle's solution is philosophically better than Davidson's solution, still has some limitations and that there is room to entertain other alternatives. Finally, we shall offer one alternative way of explaining the problem of akrasia.

Palabras clave : incontinent action; akrasia; Davidson; hypothesis of the gap; Searle.

        · resumen en Español     · texto en Español     · Español ( pdf )