SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.70 número1CAUSAS DE MUERTE MATERNA EN LA REGIÓN DE CALLAO, PERÚ. ESTUDIO DESCRIPTIVO, 2000-2015Ecografía del tercer trimestre combinada con un método clínico para mejorar la predicción del peso del recién nacido a término: un estudio de cohortes en España índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • En proceso de indezaciónCitado por Google
  • No hay articulos similaresSimilares en SciELO
  • En proceso de indezaciónSimilares en Google

Compartir


Revista Colombiana de Obstetricia y Ginecología

versión impresa ISSN 0034-7434versión On-line ISSN 2463-0225

Resumen

ZUNIGA-BRICENO, Alma Iris. CESAREAN SECTION CLASSIFICATION ACCORDING TO THE ROBSON MODEL, OBSTETRICS UNIT, SAN FELIPE GENERAL HOSPITAL, HONDURAS, APRIL-JUNE, 2017. Rev Colomb Obstet Ginecol [online]. 2019, vol.70, n.1, pp.19-26. ISSN 0034-7434.  https://doi.org/10.18597/rcog.3186.

Objective:

To classify cesarean sections according to the Robson Model in the obstetrics unit of an intermediate complexity hospital.

Materials and methods:

Descriptive cross-sectional study conducted in the obstetrics unit of the San Felipe General Hospital (HGSF), Tegucigalpa, Honduras, between April and June 2017. Out of 477 clinical records of patients undergoing elective and/ or emergency surgery during the study period, 89 were selected using probabilistic random selection. A descriptive analysis of sociodemographic variables, clinical/obstetric indications, and categories of the Robson model was conducted. Authorization from the institution was obtained.

Results:

The proportion of cesarean sections during the study period was 59.8% (477/797; 95% CI:56.3-63.3). Of the cases studied, 48/89 (53.9%) were classified as “no risk pregnancy” (categories 1-4); the most frequent indications in this group were low fetal reserve in 22/48 (22/48*100%) and cephalopelvic disproportion in 16/48 (16/48*100%). In the “risk group” (categories 5-10), in 41/89 (46.1%), indications were cephalopelvic disproportion and breech presentation, (8/41) (8/41*100%), respectively. The main contributors to cesarean section were groups 1 (17/89; 19.1%), 2 (20/89, 22.5%) and 5 (20/89; 22.5%), for a total of 64.1%.

Conclusion:

The Robson model is applicable in our setting and the classification provides information that can be used as a diagnostic and surveillance tool for cesarean sections in a level II institution.

Palabras clave : Cesarean section; classification; morbidity and mortality indicators; maternal health services.

        · resumen en Español     · texto en Español | Inglés     · Español ( pdf ) | Inglés ( pdf )