SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.44 número3El efecto Flynn en Brasil: Examinando los cambios generacionales en los tests Dibujo de la figura humana y Matrices de Colores Progresivas de RavenFunción ejecutiva y uso de estrategias semánticas en niños índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • En proceso de indezaciónCitado por Google
  • No hay articulos similaresSimilares en SciELO
  • En proceso de indezaciónSimilares en Google

Compartir


Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología

versión impresa ISSN 0120-0534

Resumen

MINERVINO, Ricardo A; MARTIN, Alejandra  y  TRENCH, Juan Máximo. Comprehending a metaphor does not require sensory-motor simulations of the base domain. rev.latinoam.psicol. [online]. 2012, vol.44, n.3, pp.23-34. ISSN 0120-0534.

There is evidence for the idea that people employ conceptual metaphors (CMs) to interpret metaphorical expressions (MEs), although the available data regarding the thesis that comprehending MEs requires sensory-motor simulations of the base domains of such CMs is scarce and ambiguous. An experiment was carried out to determine whether such sensory-motor simulations are necessary or at least enrich the comprehension of MEs. Sighted and congenitally blind subjects paraphrased novel MEs derived from the seeing-understanding CM. The congenitally blind showed very good comprehension of these MEs, and their performance on this task was not inferior compared to the sighted. It is concluded that sensory-motor simulations are not necessary nor do they enrich the comprehension of MEs, and that amodal CMs are enough for this task. Implications of the obtained results for the embodied view of Lakoff and Johnson's conceptual metaphor theory are discussed.

Palabras clave : Metaphor; conceptual metaphor; embodied cognition.

        · resumen en Español     · texto en Español     · Español ( pdf )