SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.41 número2Verificación de la lista de chequeo para seguridad en cirugía desde la perspectiva del pacienteSedación con propofol y remifentanilo para la ultrasonografía endobronquial con punción-aspiración en tiempo real índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • En proceso de indezaciónCitado por Google
  • No hay articulos similaresSimilares en SciELO
  • En proceso de indezaciónSimilares en Google

Compartir


Colombian Journal of Anestesiology

versión impresa ISSN 0120-3347

Resumen

MUNOZ, Luis  y  GRUPO DE INVESTIGACION DEORUM OPUS et al. Remifentanil vs. propofol controlled infusion for sedation of patients undergoing gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures: A clinical randomized controlled clinical trial. Rev. colomb. anestesiol. [online]. 2013, vol.41, n.2, pp.114-119. ISSN 0120-3347.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rca.2012.11.001.

Background: Target controlled infusion (TCI) for the administration of anesthesia may provide a safe alternative for managing the discomfort of patients undergoing gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures. However, the most appropriate drug available for TCI is yet to be established. The objective of this trial was to comparemifentanil vs. propofol in TCI for sedating patients during GI endoscopy. Materials and methods: Sixty-nine patients requiring GI endoscopies were randomly distributed to receive remifentanil (n = 30) or propofol (n = 39) TCI at the effect site (e). The primary outcome was patient’s satisfaction. Secondary outcomes included the gastroenterologist satisfaction, comparison of the percentage of adverse events between the two groups (occurrence of arrhythmias, major respiratory depression, bradycardia, hypotension, pain, nausea or vomiting and absence of amnesia), and the level of awareness. Retrospective registration number is NCT01746641 at Clinicaltrials.gov. Results: The mean (range) of patient satisfaction with remifentanil vs propofol was 1 (1-2) and 2 (1-4), respectively ([1]2, p < 0,001). Pain during the procedurewas found to differ between remifentanil and propofol (mean 2 vs. 1, [1]2, p = 0,042), nausea or vomiting (4 vs. 0, [1]2, p = 0,01), and absence of amnesia (29 vs. 10, [1]2, p < 0,001), respectively. No statistically significant differences were found between the two groups. Conclusion: Propofol in TCI seems to be an adequate agent for sedation of patients undergoing GI endoscopic procedures, with less adverse effects and higher patient satisfaction. Most likely, the combination of these two drugs may be synergistic and further reduce any adverse effects.

Palabras clave : Propofol; Endoscopia; Gastroenterologia; Anestésicos intravenosos; Anestesia.

        · resumen en Español     · texto en Español | Inglés     · Español ( pdf ) | Inglés ( pdf )