SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
 número105Un método rápido para buscar la media y varianza de la suma de variables lognormalesRelación entre parámetros constructivos y cargas térmicas en un edificio sin ganancias internas índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • En proceso de indezaciónCitado por Google
  • No hay articulos similaresSimilares en SciELO
  • En proceso de indezaciónSimilares en Google

Compartir


Revista Facultad de Ingeniería Universidad de Antioquia

versión impresa ISSN 0120-6230versión On-line ISSN 2422-2844

Resumen

RODRIGUES DE MORAES, Danielle et al. SOFCEV: Conventional LCC reduction and NPV based on savings in fixed carbon by sugarcane. Rev.fac.ing.univ. Antioquia [online]. 2022, n.105, pp.47-59.  Epub 05-Jun-2023. ISSN 0120-6230.  https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.redin.20210952.

Carbon pricing is a cost-effective method for mitigating climate impacts. This article examines the conventional life cycle cost (LCC), net present value (NPV), and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions of the Solid Oxide Fuel Cell Electric Vehicle (SOFCEV) powered by Brazilian fuels. The cost reduction potential of the SOFCEV was evaluated, considering the Brazilian productivity of sugarcane and the carbon fixed by these plantations, through the mechanism of carbon credits sale. Sugarcane ethanol and gasoline C (73% gasoline A and 27% anhydrous ethanol) were considered. Three scenarios were outlined: a) Cost of investment, fuel production, and vehicle maintenance and operation in USD/km, over a 10-year amortization period; b) SOFCEV emission cost from well-to-wheel added to cost (a); c) Cost of carbon fixed by hectares of sugarcane in Brazil necessary to supply the fuel demand of the SOFCEV subtracted from (b). Results showed that the ethanol-fuelled SOFCEV attends the carbon-neutral cycle, since the carbon credit sale resulted in an avoided cost 1.1 times higher than the emissions cost. Gasoline C showed similar results for the three scenarios, with an emission cost 2.5 times higher than the avoided cost. Carbon pricing was not sufficient to make the technology more viable for consumer, with an expected NPV of -USD 8006.38 after the amortization period. Thus, it is expected to obtain economic indicators to encourage the use of biofuels in electric fleets.

Palabras clave : Life cycle cost; carbon credits; solid oxide fuel cell electric vehicle; carbon dioxide emissions; sugarcane ethanol.

        · resumen en Español     · texto en Inglés     · Inglés ( pdf )