SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.24 número1ELEMENTOS DE DERECHO EUROPEO PARA LA CARACTERIZACIÓN DE LAS CLÁUSULAS ABUSIVAS EN LA CONTRATACIÓNLA RELEVANCIA DE LA DETERMINACIÓN JUDICIAL Y LA TESIS DE LA RESPUESTA MÁS JUSTA índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • En proceso de indezaciónCitado por Google
  • No hay articulos similaresSimilares en SciELO
  • En proceso de indezaciónSimilares en Google

Compartir


Díkaion

versión impresa ISSN 0120-8942

Resumen

DABOVE, MARÍA ISOLINA. LEGAL ARGUMENTATION AND REGULATORY EFFICIENCY: TOWARDS A COMPREHENSIVE SYSTEM FOR OPERATION OF THE LAW. Díkaion [online]. 2015, vol.24, n.1, pp.36-65. ISSN 0120-8942.  https://doi.org/10.5294/DIKA.2015.24.1.3.

Based on the integrativist jus-philosophical paradigm, the law can be characterized as a complex and systemic phenomenon. It can be studied from a variety of perspectives that complement one another. Accordingly, it is important to recognize that the legal phenomenon has a static perspective and another that is dynamic, and a structural and functional dimension. It also is possible to take a causalist approach, combined with one that is finalist in nature, without undermining the coherence of the research. This study looks at the question of legal argumentation by considering precisely this interpretative diversity. It examines argumentation as a three-dimensional progressive activity, a productive discursive task that is sustainable by way of discursive and effective practice, sustaining by way of reasonable discourse, and substantiating by way of justification in the legal field.

Palabras clave : Legal argumentation; regulatory effectiveness; complexity; interpretation; justification.

        · resumen en Español | Portugués     · texto en Español     · Español ( pdf )