SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.16 número27Duración y temporalidad: una defensa de la concepción del tiempo de bergson¿Son válidos los argumentos evolutivos desacreditadores de la memética contra la racionalidad del teísmo? índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • En proceso de indezaciónCitado por Google
  • No hay articulos similaresSimilares en SciELO
  • En proceso de indezaciónSimilares en Google

Compartir


Discusiones Filosóficas

versión impresa ISSN 0124-6127

Resumen

GARCIA DUQUE, Carlos Emilio. Karl Popper's scientific realism, as coherent as it is possible. discus.filos [online]. 2015, vol.16, n.27, pp.63-86. ISSN 0124-6127.  https://doi.org/10.17151/difil.2015.16.27.5.

According to some authors, Popper's realism is blatantly incoherent mainly because of his commitment with the correspondence theory of truth and due to the fact that in his theory of science is granted that, though the general aim of science is the search for truth, it might happen that a specific theory reaches that aim without us being able of knowing it. In this paper, I explain, briefly, the particularities of Popper's realism, his views on truth as a regulative ideal for science, and I show that, regardless the impossibility of establishing in a definitive way that truth has been reached, there is no incoherence that endangers his project. In this way, I answer Cardenas and others' criticisms against Popper's realism and his views on the general aim of science, and I identify the sources from which this kind of misunderstanding springs.

Palabras clave : Popper; realism; absolute truth; objective truth; aim of science.

        · resumen en Español     · texto en Español     · Español ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License Todo el contenido de esta revista, excepto dónde está identificado, está bajo una Licencia Creative Commons