SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.46 número179Contenido de nutrientes, acidez y textura del suelo en áreas degradadas por la minería en el Chocó biogeográficoAnálisis matemático de un modelo metapoblacional para la dinámica del dengue índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • En proceso de indezaciónCitado por Google
  • No hay articulos similaresSimilares en SciELO
  • En proceso de indezaciónSimilares en Google

Compartir


Revista de la Academia Colombiana de Ciencias Exactas, Físicas y Naturales

versión impresa ISSN 0370-3908

Resumen

CANO, Luisa M.; CARMONA, M. Alejandra; MARTINEZ, J. Alejandro  y  ARIAS, Paola A.. Estimation and forecast of solar radiation in the Aburrá Valley- Colombia. Rev. acad. colomb. cienc. exact. fis. nat. [online]. 2022, vol.46, n.179, pp.529-549.  Epub 13-Sep-2023. ISSN 0370-3908.  https://doi.org/10.18257/raccefyn.1576.

The diagnostic and forecast of the surface solar irradiance are important elements for the harnessing of solar energy. By validating against in situ measurements, this study assessed the skill of the ERA5 reanalysis, the GOES16 satellite estimates, and the forecasts from the Weather Research and Forecasting model (WRF) for a site in the Aburrá Valley. The analysis focuses on the diurnal cycle, the seasonal behavior, and the inter-annual variations of the estimates of surface solar irradiance and daily accumulated energy. In general, the reanalysis yielded estimates closer to the observations compared to GOES16. At the daily scale, ERA5 exhibited smaller biases (0.01 to 1.05 kWh/) than the GOES16 estimates (-1.23 to 1.07 kWh/). The ERA5 estimates showed that the solar radiation was higher during El Niño events, especially during the December-January-February season, with an average increase of about 10% compared to the neutral and La Niña conditions. On the other hand, similar to other studies, the WRF forecasts exhibited mean bias errors (MBE) of around 20%, and root mean squared errors (RMSE) of about 50%. Furthermore, the correlation analysis showed that the WRF correctly represents the hourly and day to day variations of solar irradiance with correlation values of around 0.86 and 0.81, respectively. Both the diagnostic estimates from ERA5 and GOES16, as well as the WRF forecasts, showed the largest biases during cloudy and rainy days and seasons.

Palabras clave : Solar resource; ERA5 reanalysis; GOES-16 satellite; Forecasting; Weather Research and Forecasting model (WRF).

        · resumen en Español     · texto en Español     · Español ( pdf )