Servicios Personalizados
Revista
Articulo
Indicadores
- Citado por SciELO
- Accesos
Links relacionados
- Citado por Google
- Similares en SciELO
- Similares en Google
Compartir
Opinión Jurídica
versión impresa ISSN 1692-2530
Resumen
AVENDANO GONZALEZ, Luis Eusebio Alberto y MONTOYA CAMARENA, Ramsés Samael. Internal Coherence and Theoretical Syncretism in the Mexican Constitutional Bases. Opin. jurid. [online]. 2014, vol.13, n.26, pp.81-90. ISSN 1692-2530.
In current legal theory the constitutional context is the platform for assuring rights and freedoms; however, the Mexican Constitution foresees assumptions that are mutually exclusive. This circumstance implies the prescription of a right at the Constitutional level and also a non-right; consequently, this results in a methodological syncretism. In addition to denounce such a contradiction, this article is intended to defend the premise that the Constitution requires internal coherence. Such an idea is grounded on the equality principle and the judicial interpretation as an attempt for adjusting theoretical coherence to the constitutional norms.
Palabras clave : Internal coherence; theoretical syncretism; equality.