SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.11 número3Validez y confiabilidad del cuestionario del trastorno del desarrollo de la coordinación versión en español índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • En proceso de indezaciónCitado por Google
  • No hay articulos similaresSimilares en SciELO
  • En proceso de indezaciónSimilares en Google

Compartir


Revista Ciencias de la Salud

versión impresa ISSN 1692-7273

Resumen

HENAO LEMA, Claudia Patricia  y  PEREZ PARRA, Julio Ernesto. Appearance and Concurrent Validity of an Instrument for Assessing Disability in People with Chronic Spinal Cord Injury, Based on the ICF Core Set. Rev. Cienc. Salud [online]. 2013, vol.11, n.3, pp.247-262. ISSN 1692-7273.

Objective. To determine the appearance and concurrent validity of an instrument for assessing disability in people with chronic spinal cord injury (SCI-DAS), based on the ICF Core Set. Metodology. The study was launched among a group of 100 Colombians from four cities suffering spinal cord injury for longer than six months. Eight physical therapists, with an average professional experience of over 6.75 years, participated in this study. Appearance validity was assessed through a focus group and a survey of observers, the items of coeficient of variation and the relevance and appropriateness index were calculated. Concurrent validity was analyzed with AIS (American Spinal Injury Association [ASIA] Impairment Scale) and Disability Scale WHO-DAS II, using the Spearman correlation coefficient. Results. The overall relevance and adequacy of the instrument yielded an average of 4.83/5 and 4.48/5, with a variation coefficient of 0.03. The agreement index among observers for qualifications of good and excellent reached 0.96 for relevance, and 0.86 for adequacy. The disability measured by the SCI-DAS showed a moderate significant correlation with the neurological level, the AIS motor and sensory indices, and a high correlation with disability, measured by WHO-DAS II (p<0. 001). A marginal statistically low-level correlation of functional compromise scale AIS (p = 0. 052) was found. Conclusions. In general, a good appearance validity of the instrument (SCI-DAS) was found. The concurrent validity of the instrument (SCI-DAS) through the impairment scale AIS and the Disability Scale - WHO-DAS II was also evidenced.

Palabras clave : Spinal Cord Injuries; Disability Evaluation; Test Validity.

        · resumen en Español | Portugués     · texto en Español     · Español ( pdf )