SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.23 número2Epidemiological clinical behavior of Behcet's disease índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • Em processo de indexaçãoCitado por Google
  • Não possue artigos similaresSimilares em SciELO
  • Em processo de indexaçãoSimilares em Google

Compartilhar


Revista Colombiana de Reumatología

versão impressa ISSN 0121-8123

Resumo

RESTREPO ESCOBAR, Mauricio et al. Study of the agreement between clinical opinion of rheumatologists regarding the need for immunosuppression and the result of renal biopsy in adult patients with lupus nephritis. Rev.Colomb.Reumatol. [online]. 2016, vol.23, n.2, pp.73-78. ISSN 0121-8123.

Introduction: In patients with lupus nephritis it is necessary to define the need for immuno-suppressive therapy according to histological class observed in renal biopsy. Objective: To evaluate the agreement between the opinions of six independent clinical rheumatologists regarding the need for immunosuppression and the result of renal biopsy in patients with lupus nephritis. Materials and methods: A cross-sectional study on the agreement between a diagnostic test in adult patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Each rheumatologist predicted the out-come of the biopsy. In order to evaluate the agreement, a dichotomous qualitative outcome was defined and was considered zero if it was not necessary to add a cytotoxic (classes I, II and VI), and otherwise was (classes III, IV, V or combinations). The percentage agreement and kappa statistics with a confidence interval of 95% was measured. Results: Information was collected on 34 patients, with a total of 204 predictions made by 6 rheumatology interns. Rheumatologists were correct in their clinical impression in 180 cases (88.2% concordance rate, overall kappa of 0.62 (95% CI = 0.48-0.76]. Of the 204 scenarios generated, 162 corresponded to proliferative forms of lupus nephritis, for which the rheumatologists anticipated the need for immunosuppression in 153 and failed to treat in 9 cases (5.5%, or about 1 in 18). Conclusions: The clinical opinion of rheumatologist is quite successful in defining the need for immunosuppression. In general, expert opinion could eventually be offered as an alternative choice to renal biopsy for the patient.

Palavras-chave : Lupus nephritis; Biopsy; Clinical decision-making; Immunosuppression; Consensus.

        · resumo em Espanhol     · texto em Inglês | Espanhol     · Inglês ( pdf ) | Espanhol ( pdf )