SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.53Psychometric properties of the Spanish version of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 in users of the Ecuadorian public health care system índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • Em processo de indexaçãoCitado por Google
  • Não possue artigos similaresSimilares em SciELO
  • Em processo de indexaçãoSimilares em Google

Compartilhar


Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología

versão impressa ISSN 0120-0534

Resumo

HERNANDEZ ALVARADO, José Leonel; OCHOA MEZA, Gerardo  e  GUTIERREZ VEJA, Marisela. Psychosocial intervention programs for stress management in adult migrants from Latin America: A systematic review and meta-analysis. rev.latinoam.psicol. [online]. 2021, vol.53, pp.218-227.  Epub 12-Dez-2021. ISSN 0120-0534.  https://doi.org/10.14349/rlp.2021.v53.24.

Introduction:

Latin American migrants experience vulnerability and continuous exposure to stress during their journey to United States, as a result, intervention programs with the objective to reduce psychological disorders in the migrant population have been developed.

Method:

A systematic review with meta-analysis was carried out following Cochrane and Prisma guidelines, determining the following components: population of interest, characteristics of the interventions, comparison criteria, results and intervention designs to analyze the efficacy of psychosocial intervention in stress for migrant adults of Latin American origin in the United States.

Results:

296 articles were identified through databases; EBSCO host, Science Direct, PubMed, Elsevier and the Cochrane metasearch, seven of them were included in the systematic review and six in the meta-analysis. The results of the meta-analysis indicate that stress intervention programs for adult migrants of Latin American origin in the United States had a low effect size of .17, with a variability of 98.51% and significant heterogeneity.

Conclusions:

Discrepancies were detected between the effect size reported in the primary studies and that assessed by the metafor package of the Rstudio statistical program, in addition serious limitations were found in the designs and methods used in the primary studies, which restricts the scope of the results found in the present study.

Palavras-chave : Intervention; stress; migration; Latin America; meta-analysis.

        · resumo em Espanhol     · texto em Espanhol     · Espanhol ( pdf )