SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.62 número2REPRODUCTIVE ACTIVITY AFTER INDUCED ANESTRUS USING ALTRENOGEST IN Tursiops truncatus FEMALES IN CAPTIVITY IN MARINE ENVIRONMENT índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • Em processo de indexaçãoCitado por Google
  • Não possue artigos similaresSimilares em SciELO
  • Em processo de indexaçãoSimilares em Google

Compartilhar


Revista de la Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria y de Zootecnia

versão impressa ISSN 0120-2952

Resumo

OSORIO, J. H  e  VINASCO, J. DETERMINATION OF LDL CHOLESTEROL LEVELS OF COMPARING THE PRECIPITATE METHOD VS THE FRIEDEWALD FORMULA CANINE. Rev. Med. Vet. Zoot. [online]. 2015, vol.62, n.2, pp.10-15. ISSN 0120-2952.  https://doi.org/10.15446/rfmvz.v62n2.51986.

The objetive of this study was to compare the precipitation method with the method of Friedewald formula for the determination ofLDL cholesterol in dogs. For that, blood samples of 185 overnight fasted adult dogs of different breed and sex were obtained. Blood levels of LDL cholesterol were determined by the precipitation method and later by the Friedewald method. The results were analyzed using one way ANOVA. The precipitate method reported values in mg/dl of: 52.40 average, 2.66 minimum, 132.67 maximum, 130.01 range and 24.29 of standard deviation. For its part, the Friedewald equation values in mg/dl were: 65.19 average, 4.55 minimum, 184.20 maximum, 179.65 range and 31.51 of standard deviation. The p-value in the F test was less than 0.05, indicating statistically significant difference between the two methods analyzed with a confidence level of 95.0%. In conclusion it can be used the precipitated method for determining LDL cholesterol levels in dogs.

Palavras-chave : Dogs; LDL cholesterol; precipitate method; friedewald method.

        · resumo em Espanhol     · texto em Espanhol     · Espanhol ( pdf )