SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.41 número2Checklist verification for surgery safety from the patient’s perspectiveSedation with propofol and remifentanil for real-time endobronchial ultrasound needle aspiration índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • Em processo de indexaçãoCitado por Google
  • Não possue artigos similaresSimilares em SciELO
  • Em processo de indexaçãoSimilares em Google

Compartilhar


Colombian Journal of Anestesiology

versão impressa ISSN 0120-3347

Resumo

MUNOZ, Luis  e  GRUPO DE INVESTIGACION DEORUM OPUS et al. Remifentanilo versus propofol con infusión controlada a objetivo en sitio efecto para la sedación de pacientes durante procedimientos endoscópicos gastrointestinales: ensayo clínico controlado aleatorizado. Rev. colomb. anestesiol. [online]. 2013, vol.41, n.2, pp.114-119. ISSN 0120-3347.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rca.2012.11.001.

Background: Target controlled infusion (TCI) for the administration of anesthesia may provide a safe alternative for managing the discomfort of patients undergoing gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures. However, the most appropriate drug available for TCI is yet to be established. The objective of this trial was to comparemifentanil vs. propofol in TCI for sedating patients during GI endoscopy. Materials and methods: Sixty-nine patients requiring GI endoscopies were randomly distributed to receive remifentanil (n = 30) or propofol (n = 39) TCI at the effect site (e). The primary outcome was patient’s satisfaction. Secondary outcomes included the gastroenterologist satisfaction, comparison of the percentage of adverse events between the two groups (occurrence of arrhythmias, major respiratory depression, bradycardia, hypotension, pain, nausea or vomiting and absence of amnesia), and the level of awareness. Retrospective registration number is NCT01746641 at Clinicaltrials.gov. Results: The mean (range) of patient satisfaction with remifentanil vs propofol was 1 (1-2) and 2 (1-4), respectively ([1]2, p < 0,001). Pain during the procedurewas found to differ between remifentanil and propofol (mean 2 vs. 1, [1]2, p = 0,042), nausea or vomiting (4 vs. 0, [1]2, p = 0,01), and absence of amnesia (29 vs. 10, [1]2, p < 0,001), respectively. No statistically significant differences were found between the two groups. Conclusion: Propofol in TCI seems to be an adequate agent for sedation of patients undergoing GI endoscopic procedures, with less adverse effects and higher patient satisfaction. Most likely, the combination of these two drugs may be synergistic and further reduce any adverse effects.

Palavras-chave : Propofol; Endoscopia; Gastroenterologia; Anestésicos intravenosos; Anestesia.

        · resumo em Espanhol | Inglês     · texto em Espanhol | Inglês     · Inglês ( pdf ) | Espanhol ( pdf )