SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.50 número4Mechanical power measurement during mechanical ventilation of SARS-CoV-2 critically ill patients. A cohort studyErector Spinae Plane Block. A narrative review índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • Em processo de indexaçãoCitado por Google
  • Não possue artigos similaresSimilares em SciELO
  • Em processo de indexaçãoSimilares em Google

Compartilhar


Colombian Journal of Anestesiology

versão impressa ISSN 0120-3347versão On-line ISSN 2256-2087

Resumo

GONZALEZ LA ROTTA, Mariana; MAZZANTI, Valentina; SERNA RIVAS, Laura  e  TRIANA SCHOONEWOLFF, Carlos Alberto. Cognitive load in academic clinical simulation activities. Cross-sectional study. Rev. colomb. anestesiol. [online]. 2022, vol.50, n.4, e205.  Epub 22-Out-2022. ISSN 0120-3347.  https://doi.org/10.5554/22562087.e1044.

Introduction:

Cognitive load determines working memory ability to store and retain information in long-term memory, thus conditioning learning.

Objective:

To compare cognitive loads among different simulation activities, including anesthesia and surgery simulation workshops in medical students.

Methods:

Cross-sectional analytical observational study. Two cognitive load measurement scales (Paas and NASA-TLX) were given to the students after each simulation workshop. Comparisons were made based on the scores derived from the scales.

Results:

Relevant differences were found in terms of the mental effort assessed by means of the Paas scale, as relates to student rotation order in the airway management workshop, with a greater effort being found in the group that rotated initially in surgery (6.19 vs. 5.53; p = 0.029). The workshop with the highest associated rate of frustration was the airway management workshop. Higher scores were obtained for this workshop in all the items of the NASA-TLX scale, reflecting a higher cognitive load when compared to the others.

Conclusions:

It was not possible to determine whether higher scores in some of the activities were associated with the inherent difficulty of airway management or the specific workshop design. Consequently, further studies are required to distinguish between those components in order to improve the way learning activities are designed.

Palavras-chave : Medical education; Patient simulation; Task load; Learning; Anesthesiology.

        · resumo em Espanhol     · texto em Inglês | Espanhol     · Inglês ( pdf ) | Espanhol ( pdf )