SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.33 número2Impact evaluation of the Alliance for a Caries-Free Future. Demonstrative territory, communa 20 of CaliBone regeneration in calvarial defects of NOD.CB17- Prkdcscid/J (NOD SCID) mice from dental pulp stem cells: a systematic review índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • Em processo de indexaçãoCitado por Google
  • Não possue artigos similaresSimilares em SciELO
  • Em processo de indexaçãoSimilares em Google

Compartilhar


Revista Facultad de Odontología Universidad de Antioquia

versão impressa ISSN 0121-246X

Resumo

VELASQUEZ-RON, Byron; PACHECO, Luis; QUINTANA, Pablo  e  MENA, Alexandra. Evaluation of effort zones between custom implant sinterized and the prefabricated implant though photoelasticity. Rev Fac Odontol Univ Antioq [online]. 2021, vol.33, n.2, pp.31-41.  Epub 30-Jun-2022. ISSN 0121-246X.  https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.rfo.v33n2a4.

Introduction:

the use of custom implants is a very common treatment; we assess and compare their behavior against that of conventional implants. This study aimed to make sure that the stress zones of the custom implant are different from those presented by the conventional prefabricated implant by photoelasticity.

Methods:

we subjected samples of n=10 bicuspid teeth, n=10 sintered custom implants, and n=10 conventional prefabricated implants to 3 fixed and controlled forces and observed the samples through a polariscope to analyze the distributions of effort generated. The effort zones present in the different samples were analyzed under 3 different forces.

Results:

the amounts of effort in the two types of implants under force 1 (chi-square test, p=0.596) are different, as is also the case under force 2 (chi-square test, p=0.407). Under force 3 (Levene test, p=0.899), there is no difference in the distributions of effort between the two types of implants.

Conclusions:

it was determined that the conventional prefabricated implant distributes and concentrates the effort generated under different forces better than the sintered custom implant.

Palavras-chave : dental stress analysis; prostheses and implants; bicuspid.

        · resumo em Espanhol     · texto em Espanhol     · Espanhol ( pdf )