SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.22 número2A discriminação por idade: um estudo comparativo entre estudantes universitáriosRelação entre estilos parentais disfuncionais, empatia e variáveis sociodemogpaficas em estudantes de Enfermagem, Medicina Humana e Psicologia índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • Em processo de indexaçãoCitado por Google
  • Não possue artigos similaresSimilares em SciELO
  • Em processo de indexaçãoSimilares em Google

Compartilhar


Acta Colombiana de Psicología

versão impressa ISSN 0123-9155

Resumo

MOLA, Débora Jeanette; GODOY, Juan Carlos  e  REYNA, Cecilia. Does social status matter for resource distribution?. Act.Colom.Psicol. [online]. 2019, vol.22, n.2, pp.70-98.  Epub 13-Set-2019. ISSN 0123-9155.  https://doi.org/10.14718/acp.2019.22.2.5.

Resources are distributed unequally depending on the social status (SS) of people. Researchers have often used experiments to explain the role of SS in economic decisions. However, the diverse ways of inducing SS has produced contradictory results. The aim of this study was to analyze the effect of SS on the distribution of monetary resources in students aged 18 to 25 years from Córdoba (Argentina). Three experiments using mixed factorial designs were conducted. Different ways of inducing SS and the effect on decisions in different games were examined. In Experiment 1, the effect of two SS induction techniques on the decisions of the Ultimatum Game (UG) and Dictator Game (DG) was compared. In Experiment 2, the effect of SS on the same games, including Social Value Orientation (SVO) and Subjective Social Status (SSS) as covariates was analyzed. In Experiment 3, the role of SS, SVO and SSS in the DG and the Dictator Game Taking (DGT) was examined. In the three experiments, it was not found that SS had any effect on the decisions of the games. However, more rejection and negative valence was observed (Exp. 1: p < .001, n 2 p =.72; Exp. 2: p < .001, n 2 p = .65) for unfair offers than for fair ones (Exp. 2: p < .001). Also, pro-social individuals made fairer offers in the DG (Exp. 2: p < .05) and participants offered more money in the DGT than in the DG (Exp. 3: p = .01). Those findings showed that the effect of SS on behavioral responses is not robust, which highlights the need to obtain new experimental evidence to investigate its role in those decisions.

Palavras-chave : Social Hierarchy; Social Status; Economic Games; Framing effect; Social Value Orientation; Subjective Social Status.

        · resumo em Português | Espanhol     · texto em Inglês | Espanhol     · Inglês ( pdf ) | Espanhol ( pdf )