SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.26 número1Argentinean Adaptation and Validation of the Cross-Cultural Children Trust Beliefs ScaleEffect of Spatial Contiguity on Learning Sequences of Positions índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • Em processo de indexaçãoCitado por Google
  • Não possue artigos similaresSimilares em SciELO
  • Em processo de indexaçãoSimilares em Google

Compartilhar


Acta Colombiana de Psicología

versão impressa ISSN 0123-9155

Resumo

SEPERAK-VIERA, Rosa; TORRES-VILLALOBOS, Guadalupe; GRAVINI-DONADO, Marbel  e  DOMINGUEZ-LARA, Sergio. Factorial Invariance of two Short Versions of the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC) in Arequipa University Students. Act.Colom.Psicol. [online]. 2023, vol.26, n.1, pp.95-112.  Epub 19-Fev-2023. ISSN 0123-9155.  https://doi.org/10.14718/acp.2023.26.1.7.

Resilience is an individual trait that enables biopsychosocial and spiritual readjustment, helping the psychological well-being and academic performance of university students. The objective of this research was to analyze the measurement invariance by sex of two short versions of the Connor - Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC), and to determine if there are differences between men and women. A sample of 491 Arequipa university students (63.5% women), with an average age of 20.56 years-old (SD = 3.18), from a private institution in Arequipa-Peru was evaluated with the CD-RISC-10, which includes the CD-RISC-7. First, a multi-group factor analysis was carried out with each version to assess the degree of measurement invariance achieved, and then the latent means of resilience between men and women were compared. Regarding the results, the cD-Risc-7 presented more favorable structural indicators (e.g., λ > .50; in women: CFI= .981, RMSEA= .087, WRMR = 0.683; in men: CFI= .966, RMSEA= .124, WRMR= 0.783), than THE CD-RISC-10 (e.g., λ < .50, fit indices in women: CFI = .974, RMSEA = .073, WRMR = 0.774; in men: CFI = .960, RMSEA = .095, WRMR = 0.803), including measurement invariance (strict invariance: ΔCFI= .003; ARMSEA = .001), and when comparing latent means, significant differences in favor of men were found (d = .471). Finally, the theoretical and methodological implications of the findings are discussed, as well as the need to extend the studies considering other relevant aspects for a better understanding of the resilience construct.

Palavras-chave : resilience; measurement invariance; sex; college students.

        · resumo em Espanhol     · texto em Espanhol     · Espanhol ( pdf )