SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.14 número23Sujeito e práxis socialIdentity statements, propositional invariability and contextual stipulation índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • Em processo de indexaçãoCitado por Google
  • Não possue artigos similaresSimilares em SciELO
  • Em processo de indexaçãoSimilares em Google

Compartilhar


Discusiones Filosóficas

versão impressa ISSN 0124-6127

Resumo

FLOREZ Q, Daian Tatiana  e  GARCIA D, Carlos Emilio. Rationality and incontinent action: A possible explanation. discus.filos [online]. 2013, vol.14, n.23, pp.79-103. ISSN 0124-6127.

How is well known, the problem of akratic or incontinent actions; i.e., those actions characterized because the agent acts against his best judgement, has been of great interest for philosophers since the time of Socrates. In recent theories, like those advanced by Davidson and by Searle, this problem is examined on the basis of openly contrary claims. In this paper, we shall contrast the views of Searle and Davidson on akrasia. We shall suggest that though Searle's solution is philosophically better than Davidson's solution, still has some limitations and that there is room to entertain other alternatives. Finally, we shall offer one alternative way of explaining the problem of akrasia.

Palavras-chave : incontinent action; akrasia; Davidson; hypothesis of the gap; Searle.

        · resumo em Espanhol     · texto em Espanhol     · Espanhol ( pdf )