SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.25 número4Anomalous geoelectric potential variations observed along a gas pipeline section in Argentine, possible intensification with variations of the Earth's magnetic fieldSeismic site classification of the Costa Rican Strong-Motion Network based on V S30 measurements and site fundamental period índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • Em processo de indexaçãoCitado por Google
  • Não possue artigos similaresSimilares em SciELO
  • Em processo de indexaçãoSimilares em Google

Compartilhar


Earth Sciences Research Journal

versão impressa ISSN 1794-6190

Resumo

KONAKOGLU, Berkant  e  AKAR, Alper. Geoid undulation prediction using ANNs (RBFNN and GRNN), multiple linear regression (MLR), and interpolation methods: A comparative study. Earth Sci. Res. J. [online]. 2021, vol.25, n.4, pp.371-382.  Epub 04-Mar-2022. ISSN 1794-6190.  https://doi.org/10.15446/esrj.v25n4.91195.

This study evaluated different methods for geoid undulation prediction and included two types of artificial neural networks (ANNs) - the radial basis function neural network (RBFNN) and the generalized regression neural network (GRNN) - as well as conventional methods including multiple linear regression (MLR) and ten different interpolation techniques. In this work, k-fold cross-validation was used to evaluate the model and its behavior on the independent dataset. With this validation method, each of a k number of groups has the chance to be divided into training and testing data. The performances of the methods were evaluated in terms of the root mean square error (RMSE), mean absolute error (MAE), Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency coefficient (NSE), correlation coefficient (R2), and using graphical indicators. The evaluation of the performance of the datasets obtained using cross-validation was performed in two ways. When the method having the minimum error result was accepted as the most appropriate method, the natural neighbor (NN) gave better results than the other methods (RMSE = 0.142 m, MAE = 0.097 m, NSE = 0.98986, and R2 = 0.99011). On the other hand, it was observed that on average, the GRNN exhibited the best performance (RMSE = 0.185 m, MAE = 0.137 m, NSE = 0.98229, and R2 = 0.98249).

Palavras-chave : Generalized regression neural network (GRNN); Radial basis function neural network (RBFNN); Multiple linear regression (MLR); Interpolation methods; Geoid determination.

        · resumo em Espanhol     · texto em Inglês     · Inglês ( pdf )