SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.25 número4Fezes de ruminantes como fonte de inoculo para a técnica in vitro de produção de gasesIdentificação de Brucella canis Grupo 2 em criadouros de cães na Colômbia índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • Em processo de indexaçãoCitado por Google
  • Não possue artigos similaresSimilares em SciELO
  • Em processo de indexaçãoSimilares em Google

Compartilhar


Revista Colombiana de Ciencias Pecuarias

versão impressa ISSN 0120-0690

Resumo

GARCIA GONZALEZ, José J; CORREA LONDONO, Guillermo A  e  PARDO-CARRASCO, Sandra C. Phytoplankton and periphyton in ponds with Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) and bocachico (Prochilodus magdalenae). Rev Colom Cienc Pecua [online]. 2012, vol.25, n.4, pp.603-614. ISSN 0120-0690.

Background: phytoplankton is considered the most important community in the aquatic food chain. As the basis of the food chain, periphyton offers possibilities for further optimization of extensive aquaculture ponds, although in-depth research on its effects on phytoplankton is necessary. Objective: a test was conducted to assess periphyton effects on phytoplankton concentration (org/L) and Shannon Weaver algae diversity index (DI). Methods: 18 earthen ponds (90 m2) under extensive polyculture conditions and low stocking density (2 kg/m2 at the end of the culture) were used. Fish density was 2.6 Nile tilapia/m2 and 0.7 bocachico/m2. Treatments consisted in the inclusion or absence of substrate (polyethylene pipes) for periphyton attachment (B1 for substrate presence and B2 for substrate absence) combined with three feeding strategies: no balanced feed offered (A1), 20% crude protein feed (A2), and 25% crude protein feed (A3). The combination of substrate levels and feeding strategies resulted in six treatments. Each treatment was replicated there times using a randomized complete block design for a six-month experimental period. Data were analyzed using a repeated-measure ANOVA in which time appears as a third factor (monthly samplings). Results: an interaction between factor B and time was found (P < 0.05), suggesting that the DI was significantly higher in ponds with substrate (B1) at given times (times 3, 4, 5 and 6). A significant interaction was also found between factors A*B*time (P < 0.05) for the concentration of organisms; resulting in a higher concentration of organisms in treatments that included substrate for periphyton attachment. Conclusion: periphyton had a positive influence on phytoplankton development, which is why stimulating periphyton attachment on an artificial substrate is a good way of improving a pond's primary production.

Palavras-chave : Cichlidae; fishculture; polyculture; primary production; Prochilodontidae.

        · resumo em Português | Espanhol     · texto em Inglês     · Inglês ( pdf )