SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
 número33Plebiscites for peace and fundamental rights in Colombia. A historical and comparative approach, 1957-2016Background of corruption and its importance in land seizure in Colombia índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • Em processo de indexaçãoCitado por Google
  • Não possue artigos similaresSimilares em SciELO
  • Em processo de indexaçãoSimilares em Google

Compartilhar


Revista republicana

versão impressa ISSN 1909-4450versão On-line ISSN 2256-5027

Resumo

DAZA GONZALEZ, Alfonso. Intervention of the judge of knowledge from Colombia in the hearings prior to the judgment in front of the guarantee of judicial impartiality and the accusatory principle. Rev. repub. [online]. 2022, n.33, pp.77-94.  Epub 25-Fev-2023. ISSN 1909-4450.  https://doi.org/10.21017/rev.repub.2022.v33.a128.

In Colombia, in order to adopt an accusatory criminal procedure system, the 1991 Political Constitution was reformed with Legislative Act 03 of 2002. The regulation of this criminal procedural system was given through Law 906 of 2004, "By which the Code of Criminal Procedure is issued." In development of these regulations, the following hearings were created: i) preliminary; ii) formulation of the accusation; iii) preparatory; and iv) judgment. In the first ones, the judge with the function of control of guarantees intervenes. Later, the judge of knowledge intervenes, who is in charge of directing the judgment and to indicate the sense of failure.

Likewise, the Supreme Court of Justice has indicated that, in order to avoid that the formulation of the accusation is inadequate and that the judicial apparatus becomes unjustifiably congested, the judge of knowledge must carry out a material control to the accusation.

This research analyzes if the intervention of the judge of knowledge in the hearings prior to the judgment: formulation of the accusation and preparatory, as well as the control that he carries out over the accusation, affects the guarantee of judicial impartiality and the accusatory principle.

The investigation problem is: does the intervention of the judge of knowledge in the hearings prior to the judgment: formulation of the accusation and preparatory, as well as the control that he carries out over the accusation, affects the guarantee of judicial impartiality and the accusatory principle? The thesis defended in this research is that the intervention of the judge of knowledge in the hearings prior to the judgment: formulation of the accusation and preparatory, as well as the control that he carries out over the accusation, affects the guarantee of judicial impartiality and the principle accusatory, respectively, the legislation, jurisprudence and existing doctrine on the subject are analyzed.

Palavras-chave : Criminal Law; Judge; Penal procedure; criminal challenge Accusatory Principle.

        · resumo em Espanhol     · texto em Espanhol     · Espanhol ( pdf )