SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.3 número3A MODIFIED APPROACH TO PREDICT PORE PRESSURE USING THE D EXPONENT METHOD:: AN EXAMPLE FROM THE CARBONERA FORMATION, COLOMBIACORRELATION DEVELOPMENT BETWEEN INDENTATION PARAMETERS AND UNAXIAL COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH FOR COLOMBIAN SANDSTONES índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • Em processo de indexaçãoCitado por Google
  • Não possue artigos similaresSimilares em SciELO
  • Em processo de indexaçãoSimilares em Google

Compartilhar


CT&F - Ciencia, Tecnología y Futuro

versão impressa ISSN 0122-5383versão On-line ISSN 2382-4581

Resumo

ESCOBAR, Freddy-Humberto; LOPEZ, Aura-María  e  CANTILLO, José-Humberto. EFFECT OF THE PSEUDOTIME FUNCTION ON GAS RESERVOIR DRAINAGE AREA DETERMINATION. C.T.F Cienc. Tecnol. Futuro [online]. 2007, vol.3, n.3, pp.113-124. ISSN 0122-5383.

The gas flow equation is normally linearized to allow the liquid solution of the diffusivity equation to satisfy gas behavior when analyzing transient test data of gas reservoirs. When wellbore storage conditions are insignificant, drawdown tests are best analyzed using the pseudopressure function. On the other hand, buildup pressure tests require linearization of both pseudotime and pseudopressure. It is not the case for the TDS technique which is indifferently applied to either drawdown or buildup tests. However, whichever the case, pseudotime has certain effect at very long testing times in formations of moderate to high permeability. In this paper, we implemented the Tiab’s Direct Synthesis (TDS) technique, to include pseudotime effects, and observe its influence on the interpretation results of gas well test data at early and late time periods. New analytical equations to estimate reservoir permeability, wellbore storage coefficient, pseudoskin factor and reservoir drainage area are presented. Then, a comparison of results against rigorous time was carried out for simulated and field cases. We found acceptable results for permeability, pseudoskin factor and wellbore storage coefficient. However, for the case of reservoir drainage area, the deviation error was of 4,1% for a simulated case and 17,9% for a field case. However, the smaller of these deviations may be small if related to pressure transient analysis results. However, this deviation in a gas reservoir with reserves of one tera standard cubic feet is equivalent to a huge difference of 38 gigas of standard cubic feet of gas which may have an economic impact to any oil company.

Palavras-chave : reservoir gas; pressure; TDS technique; steady state; permeability; radial flow; mathematical models.

        · resumo em Espanhol     · texto em Inglês     · Inglês ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License Todo o conteúdo deste periódico, exceto onde está identificado, está licenciado sob uma Licença Creative Commons