SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
 issue72Kuhnian practical politics: Why it’s (epistemically) virtuous to be (evaluatively) attached to a paradigmPablo Melogno’s legacy: interpreting Kuhn’s work on science education author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


Estudios de Filosofía

Print version ISSN 0121-3628

Abstract

SARAIVA, Ignacio. Information science and paradigms: a review from Kuhnian philosophy. Estud.filos [online]. 2025, n.72, pp.164-185.  Epub Sep 04, 2025. ISSN 0121-3628.  https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.ef.356885.

Information science has tried to consolidate its scientific status on the basis of Kuhnian conceptions of science. Thus, the notion of paradigm is central to analyze its epistemological problems. Several authors have postulated different paradigms for the area, with the understanding that the attainment of a paradigm will allow its consolidation and unification. The main developments of paradigms within the discipline are analyzed, as well as other elements of the Kuhnian perspective. A critical review of the application of the notions present in The Structure of Scientific Revolutions to the epistemological and historical reconstruction of the field is made. It is concluded that the Kuhnian philosophy provides propositional elements when thinking about epistemological problems, since the ability to articulate and generate consensus is found in the community and the assumption of a successful tradition of problem solving.

Keywords : Thomas Kuhn; paradigms; incommensurability; epistemology of information science; history of information science.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in Spanish     · Spanish ( pdf )