SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.54 issue1Quantification, origin, and distribution of aliphatic hydrocarbons in marine sediments of the Protected Natural Areas of Pachacamac and Asia Islands in Lima, PeruFirst record of Paulita tuberculata (Brachyura, Majoidea, Inachoididae) in the Caribbean Sea author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • On index processCited by Google
  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO
  • On index processSimilars in Google

Share


Boletín de Investigaciones Marinas y Costeras - INVEMAR

Print version ISSN 0122-9761

Bol. Invest. Mar. Cost. vol.54 no.1 Santa Marta Jan./June 2025  Epub Feb 26, 2025

https://doi.org/10.25268/bimc.invemar.2025.54.1.1346 

Research Articles

Sediment pollution by metals (As, Cd, Cr, Cu, Hg, Ni, and Pb) in the Colombian Caribbean

Contaminación en sedimentos por metals (As, Cd, Cr, Cu, Hg, Ni y Pb) en el Caribe colombiano

Andrés Navarro-Martínez1 
http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8739-8936

Anubis Vélez-Mendoza2 
http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3878-8107

Nicolás Santos Vásquez3 
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6398-9798

Margui Almario-García4 
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0926-7233

Néstor Hernando Campos-Campos5 
http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2510-3009

Adolfo Sanjuan-Muñoz6 
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4786-862X

1Área de Ciencias Biológicas y Ambientales, Facultad de Ciencias Naturales e Ingeniería, Universidad de Bogotá Jorge Tadeo Lozano, Sede Santa Marta Colombia . andres.navarrom@utadeo.edu.co

2Instituto de Estudios en Ciencias del Mar (Cecimar), Universidad Nacional de Colombia Sede Caribe, Santa Marta. Colombia anvelezme@unal.edu.co

3Instituto de Estudios en Ciencias del Mar (Cecimar), Universidad Nacional de Colombia Sede Caribe, Santa Marta. Colombiansantosv@unal.edu.co

4Área de Ciencias Biológicas y Ambientales, Facultad de Ciencias Naturales e Ingeniería, Universidad de Bogotá Jorge Tadeo Lozano, Sede Santa Marta. Colombiamarguil.almariog@utadeo.edu.co

5 Instituto de Estudios en Ciencias del Mar (Cecimar), Universidad Nacional de Colombia Sede Caribe, Santa Marta. Colombia nhcamposc@unal.edu.co

6Área de Ciencias Biológicas y Ambientales, Facultad de Ciencias Naturales e Ingeniería, Universidad de Bogotá Jorge Tadeo Lozano, Sede Santa Marta. Colombia adolfo.sanjuan@utadeo.edu.co


ABSTRACT

Metals are pollutants released into the environment by anthropogenic and natural sources, and they can reach marine and coastal ecosystems through river discharge and atmospheric processes. In the Colombian Caribbean, the Magdalena and Sinú rivers introduce large quantities of sediments containing traces of multiple pollutants - including metals. This research aims to determine the metal contamination levels of marine sediments in two sectors of the Colombian Caribbean that are influenced by the Magdalena and Sinú Rivers. Sediments were collected using a dredge, and the concentration of metals was analyzed through atomic absorption spectrometry. In addition, granulometry analyses and organic matter determination were performed. The area of influence of the Sinú exhibited the highest concentrations of potentially toxic metals in sediments in both the dry and rainy seasons. The metals that reported the highest average concentrations (µg/g) were Cd (0.78), As (13.97), Cr (114.72), Cu (63.9), and Ni (58.18). Based on the results of this study, it can be stated that the sediments in the areas of influence of the Sinú and Magdalena Rivers exhibit concentrations of some metals above the reference values proposed by NOAA.

Keywords: marine pollution; southwestern Caribbean; soft bottoms; Sinú River; Magdalena River

RESUMEN

Los metales son contaminantes liberados al ambiente por fuentes antropogénicas y naturales, y pueden llegar a los ecosistemas marinos y costeros mediante descarga fluvial y procesos atmosféricos. En el Caribe colombiano, los ríos Magdalena y Sinú aportan grandes cantidades de sedimentos que contienen trazas de múltiples contaminantes, entre estos metales. En esta investigación se pretende determinar los niveles de contaminación por metales en los sedimentos marinos de dos sectores del Caribe colombiano influenciados por los ríos Magdalena y Sinú. Se colectaron sedimentos usando una draga, y la concentración de metales fue analizada por medio de espectrometría de absorción atómica. Además, se realizó análisis de granulometría y determinación de materia orgánica. El área de influencia del Sinú presentó las mayores concentraciones de metales potencialmente tóxicos en los sedimentos, tanto en la época seca como en la lluviosa. Los metales que presentaron las concentraciones promedio (µg/g) más altas fueron Cd (0.78), As (13.97), Cr (114.72), Cu (63.9) y Ni (58.18). Con base en los resultados de este estudio se puede afirmar que los sedimentos de las áreas de influencia de los ríos Sinú y Magdalena presentan concentraciones de algunos metales por encima de los valores de referencia propuestos por la NOAA.

Palabras clave: contaminación marina; Caribe suroccidental; fondos blandos; río Sinú; río Magdalena

INTRODUCTION

Metals are released into the environment by anthropogenic and natural sources (Ansari et al., 2004; Ismail, 2006; Anbuselvan et al., 2018) and are often highly reactive, generating negative impacts in aquatic ecosystems (Gheorghe et al., 2017). In most organisms, even exposure to low concentrations may be extremely toxic if it exceeds their threshold concentration (Castañé et al., 2003; Ahmed et al., 2013; Gall et al., 2015). The non-biodegradable nature of these potentially toxic elements favors their bioaccumulation in trophic networks (Gall et al., 2015; Zhang et al., 2016). In marine and coastal ecosystems, metal contamination is predominantly influenced by river discharges that carry considerable amounts of sediments and transport diverse compounds along their continental path (Morillo et al., 2004), as well as by direct discharges. Once they enter an ecosystem, they can accumulate in sediments or be absorbed by organisms (Wright and Mason, 1999; Pérez-López et al., 2003).

Metal deposition in sediments depends on environmental conditions and the physical and chemical alterations of these potentially toxic elements. Likewise, due to said changes, metals may return to the water column through diffusion and mixing processes, which are facilitated by benthic organism activity or resuspension (Meyerson et al., 1981; Campbell and Guy, 1995). The high availability of metals deposited in sediments can impact some species directly, which may accumulate high concentrations and even exhibit chronic effects in their populations (Cosma et al., 1982; Acosta et al., 2002).

In metal sedimentation and transport processes in estuarine zones, physical, chemical, and biological processes are involved. Current circulation, river and underground water discharges, tidal flooding, the entry and resuspension of sediments, salinity, the redox potential, and pH, along with the presence of organisms, determine the mobility of metals (Botsou et al., 2011; de Souza-Machado et al., 2016). Although the net effect often generates complex distribution patterns, it has been found that sediment composition, especially regarding particle size, is one of the most influential factors in the retention and mobilization of metals (Krumgalz et al., 1992; Okoro et al., 2013; Yao et al., 2015).

In Colombia, metal contamination reports associated with the industrial, agricultural, and mining sectors are commonplace (Pabón et al., 2020). However, reports categorizing this contamination are scarce. Therefore, this study aims to determine the metal contamination levels in two sectors of the Colombian Caribbean, which are influenced by the Magdalena and Sinú Rivers in two climatic seasons (rainy and dry), as well as their relationship with environmental variables.

STUDY AREA

Sampling was carried out in two sectors. The first sector was dubbed Magdalena and spans five localities (El Rodadero, ROD; Tasajera, TAS; Ciénaga Grande de Santa Marta, CGSM; Salamanca, SAL; and Atlántico, ATL) influenced by the Magdalena River, and the second sector was named Sinú, also encompassing five localities (Caimanera, CAI; Cispatá, CIS; Sinú, ZEN; Tinajones, TIN; and Isla Fuerte, ISF) influenced by the Sinú River mouth.

The climate regime of the Colombian Caribbean Sea is determined by its location in the intertropical convergence zone (ITCZ), which is why there is no marked seasonality as in temperate zones (Lozano-Duque et al., 2010). This region is characterized by a convective, bimodal rainfall regime influenced by the south-north movement of the ITCZ and by its influence on the northeastern trade winds (Pujos et al., 1986; Andrade, 1993; Lozano-Duque et al., 2010). Historically, the dry climatic season takes place between December and April, and the rainy one during the rest of the year, interrupted by a relative minimum in July and August, popularly known in Colombia as veranillo de San Juan (Saint John’s little summer) (Salzwedel and Müller, 1983; Andrade-Amaya and Thomas, 1988; Andrade, 1993). During the dry season, the ITCZ is positioned to the south, and the trade winds strongly and constantly blow from the northeast, whereas, in the rainy season, the ITCZ is positioned to the north, weakening the winds with a variable direction, given the influence of its instability (Pujos et al., 1986; Bernal et al., 2006). Starting in December, the northeastern wind exhibits an increasing trend regarding its magnitude, reaching maxima in February and March. From April, the magnitude gradually decreases, and there is a prevalence of south-southwest winds (Bernal et al., 2006; Mancera-Pineda et al., 2013).

In the Magdalena sector, the CGSM locality is in an area with estuarine conditions, which is characterized by the presence of mangroves, tropical fry forests, and aquatic plants associated with freshwater swamps, as a result of the influence of the Magdalena River on the Pajarales Complex (Bernal, 1996; Espinosa et al., 2011). The remaining localities are in the marine area between El Rodadero (department of Magdalena) and Puerto Velero (department of Atlántico).

In the Sinú sector, the ZEN and ISF localities are in an area of greater marine influence, while the CIS and TIN localities exhibit a higher incidence of continental waters, as they are located in Cispatá Bay and the Tinajones Delta, respectively, in the Sinú River mouth (Estela and López-Victoria, 2005). The selection of localities aimed to estimate the metal concentrations of marine, deltaic, and estuarine sites. The Sinú River can influence the ciénaga of La Caimanera, given the exchange of waters of the latter with the Gulf of Morrosquillo (Figure 1).

Figure 1 Location of the sediment sampling stations (1, 2, and 3) in each locality (ATL, CGSM, ROD, SAL, TAS, CAI, CIS, ISF, ZEN, and TIN) in sectors of the Magdalena (A) and Sinú (B) Rivers (Elaborated by Luis Garzón). 

METHODOLOGY

Field phase

In each locality, three stations were evaluated. From each of these stations, three sediment samples were collected with a van Veen dredge. At least 950 g of sediments were obtained, which were divided into 600 g for metal concentration analysis, 300 g for granulometric analysis, and 50 g for organic matter determination. The samples were stored in low-density polyethylene bags with airtight closure, which had been previously labeled. These bags were kept refrigerated until their analysis in the lab.

Laboratory phase

Determining the metal concentration

The metal concentration was determined in the Toxicology and Environmental Management Laboratory of Universidad de Córdoba (Montería, Colombia), using sediments ≤ 63 μm and atomic absorption spectrometry (Baird et al., 2017) while following the corresponding procedures for each metal. For mercury (Hg), the EPA 7473 PLTX methodology was used, which is based on the direct analysis of Hg via thermal decomposition, amalgamation, and atomic absorption spectrometry (Fernández-Martínez et al., 2015). For chromium (Cr) and nickel (Ni), the EPA 3015-SM3111B-FLAAS PLTX-012 method was employed, as well as EPA 3015 A-FLAAS PLTX-019 for copper (Cu). These methods consist of introducing the sample into a flame, where it is atomized. Thus, the vapor solution releases the atoms of the element of interest, some of which are thermally excited by the temperature of the flame. However, most of them remain in their ground state. Ground-state atoms can absorb radiation of a specific wavelength generated by an emission source containing the analyzed element (Cantle, 1982). Lead (Pb) and cadmium (Cd) were analyzed through the EPA 3015A-GFAAS PLTX-009 methodology, which is based on the same principle as FLAAS, albeit replacing the standard burner head with a graphite furnace (GFAAS) at approximately 3000 °C (Welz and Sperling, 1999). Finally, arsenic (As) was determined through hydride generation atomic absorption spectrometry (HGAAS), which consists of three fundamental stages: the generation and volatilization of hydrides, their transfer, and their later atomization in the atomic absorption spectrometer, under the EPA 3051 A-HGAAS PLTX-021 method (Minoia and Caroli, 1992).

Granulometric analysis

150 - 200 g of collected sediments were dried in an oven at 90 ± 5 °C. Afterwards, 100 g of dry sediments were weighed. When the samples agglomerated, these 100 g were diluted in 1 L of deionized water with 40 mL of 1 % (NaPO3)6 (6.2 g/L) for 24 h, in order to achieve the dispersion of particles of different sizes. Once the disaggregated or diluted dry sediment had been obtained, the samples were sieved to separate them by grain size (between 1 mm and 63 µm). Finally, each fraction was weighed separately, and the particles were classified were classified as very coarse sand (1 mm), coarse sand (500 µm), medium sand (250 µm), fine sand (180 - 125 µm), very fine sand (90 - 63 µm), and mud (< 63 µm).

Organic matter determination

5 g of each sample were placed in previously weighed and labeled crucibles, and they were dried in a muffle furnace for 5 h at 550 °C. Afterwards, they were placed in a desiccator for 2 h, and they were weighed again to determine the organic matter content by mass difference:

MO = inicial weight (5 g) - final weight

Cabinet phase

A descriptive analysis of the metal concentrations was conducted by means of the arithmetic mean and the standard deviation. The concentrations were compared against the limit values proposed by the NOAA for both threshold effect levels (TEL) and probable effect levels (PEL) (Buchman, 2008). Based on these, the potential ecological risk index (PERI) was calculated.

Potential ecological risk index (PERI)

The level of contamination, the toxicity, and the reaction of the environment due to As, Cd, Cr, Cu, Hg, Ni, and Pb concentrations in sediment samples for each climatic period were determined by calculating the potential ecological risk coefficient (PERC) of each metal (Table 1). This coefficient is calculated by multiplying the contamination factor (fi) by the Hakanson toxicity coefficients (CTH) of each metal (Hakanson, 1980).

CREP i = CTH × F i

Table 1 Reference values for the toxic response factors of metals in sediments. TEL: tolerable effect level for the biota and the ecosystem. CTH: Hakanson toxicity coefficients. 

The contamination factor fi is defined as the quotient between the recorded concentration of each metal in the sediment (Ci) and the reference value (Cb) of the TEL for the biota and the ecosystem (Table 1) described by Buchman (2008):

Once the PERC values for each metal had been obtained, the PERI of each period was finally calculated (Table 2) using the equation proposed by González et al. (2018) and Lie (2021).

Table 2 Potential ecological risk by metal contamination (González et al., 2018; Liu et al., 2021). 

To determine whether there were metal concentration differences between sectors (SE, k = 2), periods (PE, k = 2), and localities (LO, k = 5), a univariate permutation analysis (Permanova) was conducted in the Primer software, version 7.0.21. 9999 permutations were executed using the Euclidean distance. A residual permutation under a reduced model was also carried out, as well as the Monte Carlo test ant the type III sum of squares (Anderson et al., 2008). Finally, a permutation test of the linear model based on the DistLM distance was carried out, using the step-wise model with the AICc selection criterion (Clarke and Gorley, 2015).

RESULTS

The Sinú sector exhibited the highest average metal concentrations in the two climatic periods, especially at the TIN and ZEN localities. The lowest values were often found in the Magdalena sector, in TAS and CGSM (Annex 1).

The highest concentrations of As, Cd, Cu, and Pb were recorded during the dry period, and those of Ni, Cr, and Hg were observed in the rainy period. The lowest concentrations of As, Cd, Cu, and Pb were measured during the rainy period, while those of Cu, Hg, and Ni were determined in the dry period. Unlike the other metals, the variations in the concentration of Cr and Cu were not influenced by the time of the year; for them, both the highest and lowest concentrations were estimated during the same climatic period (Table 3).

Table 3 Highest and lowest average concentration (µ/g) of each metal during both climatic periods (SC: dry; Ll: rainy) in both studied sectors (SIN: Sinú; MAG: Magdalena). TIN: Tinajones, CGSM: Ciénaga Grande de Santa Marta, TAS: Tasajera, and ZEN: Sinú. 

When comparing the concentrations reported in this study against the TEL and PEL reference values, we evidenced that the concentrations of Ni exceeded these levels at some localities of the Sinú sector in both periods. During the dry period, As was the only metal that exhibited concentrations above the TEL in more localities of the Magdalena sector (in comparison with the Sinú sector). The other metal exhibited concentrations both above and below the TEL, except for Pb, which did not exceed the reference value (Figure 2).

Figure 2 Metal concentrations in localities of the Magdalena and Sinú sectors, in comparison with the TEL and PEL reference values during the dry and rainy periods. 

All the metals exhibited significant differences between sectors, periods, and localities, as well as in the interaction between factors. The concentrations of Hg and Ni showed differences in the three factors, and Cd exhibited differences between periods, sectors, and their interaction. Meanwhile, Cr and Cu recorded significant differences between sectors and localities, but not between periods. On the other hand, Pb exhibited differences between periods and localities, but not between sectors. Finally, As only showed differences between periods (Annex 2).

The pairwise comparison Permanova indicates that the localities of the Magdalena sector exhibited significant differences in the concentration of As, Cr, and Cu during the rainy period. On the other hand, in the dry period, significant differences were only observed in the concentration of As for the TAS and CGSM localities. Meanwhile, in the Sinú sector, significant differences in the concentrations of As, Cd, Cr, Cu, Hg, and Ni were detected during both dry and rainy periods (Annex 3).

Relationship between metal concentrations and predictor variables

The results of the DistLM analysis allowed confirming the existence of a positive correlation between the metal concentration, the smallest grain sizes, and organic matter (Table 4). In this vein, it is understandable that higher concentrations were found in the Sinú sector, where the stations exhibited a dominance of muds and clays. This, in comparison with the Magdalena sector, which mud percentage was lower in both periods (Figure 3). The highest percent variation in metal concentration is apparently explained by the mud content (27.1 %), followed by the organic matter content (20.74 %), and the amount of fine sands (14.05 %), very fine sands (13.93 %), and very coarse sands (5.82 %). When considering all variables as a whole based on the sequential multivariate model, it was observed that only the organic matter content and the fine and very fine sands explained 31.52 % of the variation in the metal content of the sediments (Table 4).

Table 4 Results of the marginal and sequential DistLM tests regarding the metal concentration explained by seven predictor variables, which were identified by means of the All Specified model (9999 permutations). SC: sum of squares. 

Figure 3 Percentage of particles in the sediments of the Magdalena and Sinú sectors during the rainy (A) and dry (B) periods. Sediment types: very coarse sand (1 mm), coarse sand (500 µm), medium sand (250 µm), fine sand (180 - 125 µm), very fine sand (90 - 63 µm), and mud (< 63 µm). 

Potential ecological risk coefficient (PERC) and potential ecological risk index (PERI)

The PERC was low for most of the metals in both periods, except for Hg in Tinajones during the dry period, which was moderate. Likewise, the PERI indicates a low contamination in all localities during the rainy period, as well as moderate levels in most of them during the dry period (Annex 4). This value increased due to the larger number of stations with moderate to high levels (Figure 2).

DISCUSSION

It is possible that marine pollution by metals is the result of continental anthropic activities, which are usually the main cause of increased concentrations of these elements in aquatic ecosystems (Tulonen et al., 2006), as they can be transported by rivers, water currents in estuaries and channels, surface and underground water flows, and submarine sewage outfalls, which also introduce large amounts of organic matter (Escobar, 2002). All these pollution sources may favor the accumulation of high metal concentrations in the sediments, as was found in this study.

The alteration of the natural metal concentrations, which result from natural processes such as precipitation, soil erosion (Baize and Sterckeman, 2001; Yang et al., 2020), or volcanism and geothermal phenomena (Bundschuh et al., 2021) has been associated with the industry, agricultural activity, and mining (Londoño-Franco et al., 2016). The main causes for the high metal concentrations in Tinajones and Sinú likely have to do with their proximity to the Sinú River mouth, as this river can transport metals from the different sectors where it flows to the sediments of the stations near its mouth. In the localities of Atlántico and El Rodadero (Magdalena), the high concentrations found in this work may be due to the proximity to anthropic activities in cities like Barranquilla, which features significant industrial activity, and Santa Marta, which has a submarine outfall.

The high concentrations of As, Cd, Cr, Cu, and Ni, above the TEL and PEL, in some samples from the Sinú River’s area of influence may be mainly due to activities such as extensive agriculture, mining, and the influence of the Urrá dam. In the case of agriculture, pesticides and fertilizers are often used which may alter the natural metal concentrations (Gimeno-García et al., 1996; Roozbahani et al., 2015). Large areas are allocated for the cultivation of corn, cotton, and rice, among other products (Cadena-Torres et al., 2021), allowing agriculture to become one of the sources for the high concentrations of these metals in the sector. The influence of mining on the high concentration of metals such as Ni could be related to the presence of the largest iron and nickel mine in Latin America (Cerro Matoso) and to other small-scale exploitation activities near the upper basin of the Sinú River (Marrugo-Negrete et al., 2017; Arenas et al., 2022). On the other hand, the influence of the Urrá dam as a potential source of heavy metal enrichment is due to the flooding of 7400 ha of land, which accelerated the leaching of metals and the constituents of the soil affected by downstream discharge from the dam, as well as to the decomposition of the vegetation present before the flooding (Feria et al., 2010). In the Magdalena sector, the high concentrations of Ni and Cu during both climatic periods, as well as those of As and Cd during the dry period, are likely due to the treated and non-treated effluents from different industries related to oil activity, hydrocarbon transport, and the disposal of compounds and particles from industrial emissions (Tejeda-Benitez et al., 2016).

It must also be considered that the extensive agricultural, mining, and water impoundment activity generates an imbalance in natural contents, causing the metal concentration of the soils flooded by the river to exhibit a decreasing order, i.e., (Zn) > (Cu) > (Ni) > (Hg) > (Pb) > (Cd), in both the middle and lower basin of the Sinú River (Marrugo-Negrete et al., 2017). The most abundant metals (Zn, CU, and Ni) stem from a common source, which could be lithology of the floodplain areas, given that the conditions generated in soils flooded for long periods of time may favor the formation of volatile acids, a sulfate-reducing environment, and the subsequent release and availability of the metals (Poot et al., 2007). In addition to these processes, the proximity to mining activities in the course of the Sinú may have caused the concentrations of Ni and Cu to exceed the TEL in all localities (Figure 2). The concentrations of As, Cd, Hg, and Pb (Figure 2), which were below the reference values during the rainy period, may evince a low anthropic contribution, allowing these elements to continue their natural processes in aquatic environments, where they are rapidly deposited in solid material, given their low solubility (Förstner and Wittmann, 1981), and accumulate in the sediments with higher concentrations than those of the surrounding waters (Tessier and Campbell, 1988), albeit with a low probability of generating harmful effects.

The metal distribution in the bottom sediments it not only affected by anthropogenic influence, but also by the mineral composition, the suspended material composition, and by in situ processes such as sediment deposition, absorption, microbial activity, and interactions with dissolved organic and inorganic ligands, among others (Jain et al., 2005; Sander et al., 2015). All these processes dictate the availability of metals, and, even though no concentrations were found which indicate sediment pollution by As, Cd, and Hg during the rainy period (and by Pb in both climatic periods) (Figure 2), it cannot be guaranteed that the environment is not polluted because these metals might be accumulating in other components of the ecosystem.

The Magdalena exhibits direct and indirect waste discharges through its tributaries along its course through 11 departments, which deteriorates its water quality (Ortiz-Romero et al., 2015). This river also features the greatest sediment contribution of the great rivers in the Caribbean (Restrepo and Kjerfve, 2000). However, only an apparent pollution by Cu and Ni is observed. It is likely that the other metals exhibit incorporation and accumulation processes in organisms at different points in the river (Noreña-Ramírez et al., 2012) or in influence areas such as the Ciénaga Grande de Santa Marta (Campos, 1990). This metal incorporation may be the reason for the low sediment concentrations.

An enrichment of metals such as Cd, Mn, Ni, Cr, Cu, Hg, Pb, and Zn in the Sinú River has been described, which is due to erosive processes on the riverbanks, its tributaries, and in floodplain areas (Feria et al., 2010). Nevertheless, this study only evidenced that metal enrichment in sediments corresponds to Cu, Ni, and, to a lesser extent, Cr, highlighting that Ni and Cr exhibited significantly lower concentrations in the furthest stations from the river mouth, in the CAI and ISF localities (Figure 1), which underscores the relevance of more frequent monitoring to better describe the pollution in said region.

The results obtained via DistLM analysis show that the highest explained variability corresponds to organic matter and the size of the smallest particles. It has been mentioned that the normalization method, which consists of the relationship between an element and the amount of fine-grain material in each sample, may lead to erroneous interpretations when the last fraction separated from the sediments is smaller than 63 µm. At this size, a mixture of muds and clays can be found, with the latter representing the fraction with the highest adsorption capacity; if they are not correctly represented, interpretation errors may occur (Szava-Kovats, 2008). Considering the above, it is possible that, when relating the clay content to the concentration of different metals, the proportion of the explained variability increases.

During metal accumulation in an environment, the number of particles of a given size, the mobilization of metals to the interstitial water, chemical speciation, and the influence of bioturbation and salinity intervene, among other factors (Bryan et al., 1992; Krumgalz et al., 1992). In addition, sediments are not only final pollutant deposits; they can also serve as entry sources into benthic organisms and benthic trophic networks in general (Griscom and Fisher, 2004). The above favors the fact that the variability in the metal concentrations that is not explained by grain size or organic matter content lies in the influence and interactions of these environmental factors, which were not considered in this study.

As for the relationship of variables represented through the sequential DistLM test between fine sizes, organic matter, and metal concentration, it is evidenced that size is a fundamental property of sediment particles, which affects their movement, transport, and deposition (Pye and Blott, 2004), showing an increase in the metal content as the amount of fine particles increases (Harbison, 1986; Rubio et al., 2000; Tansel and Rafiuddin. 2016). This demonstrates a preferential association of metals with finer sediments, since the latter have larger relative surface areas, on which the former can bind or be adsorbed (Libes, 2011).

On the other hand, organic matter may influence the concentration of metals such as As, which is often retained in organic matter contents, preventing it from accumulating in the lower soil strata (Kabata-Pendias and Pendias, 2001). The lower concentrations of this metal both in the rainy period and in the CGSM, CAI, and CIS localities can be explained by an increase in the concentration of organic matter stemming from a greater contribution by rivers and runoff, as well as by the degradation of the litter from the mangrove growing in these areas (Orihuela et al., 2004). Nevertheless, there is no evident difference in the amount of organic matter in this and other localities of the same sectors, which is likely due to the fact that this type of matter can by metabolized by a diversity of organisms, or it can be exported in dissolved form or as suspended particles (López-Portillo and Ezcurra, 2002). The differences in the metal concentration of the localities with a similar fine particle content may be due to processes altering particle size, sedimentation speed distribution, erosion processes, water content, minerology, cationic exchange capacity, flow disturbances, the deposition rate, bioturbation, or the organic matter content (McCave, 1984; Matagi et al., 1998).

CONCLUSIONS

The sediments in the influence areas of the Sinú and Magdalena Rivers exhibit high concentrations of Cu, Cr, and Ni, above the reference values proposed by the NOAA, likely as a result of diverse anthropic activities. The anthropic influence seems to have a greater impact on the Sinú, which is why concrete measures should be identified to regulate the contribution of said metals, especially in the case of Ni, whose high concentrations are highly capable of generating harmful effects to the environment. The low concentrations of As, Cd, Hg, and Pb found in the sediments do not guarantee their absence in the river mouths, as they can appear in other chemical forms with higher bio-availability, and they may be incorporated by organisms in these places’ trophic networks, which in turn depend on the availability of organic matter and the predominance of fine particles in the sediments that is typically associated with the climatic period.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This study was carried out within the framework of the project titled Pollution levels related to heavy metals (Hg, Cd, Ni, Zn, Pb, Se, Al, As, and Cu), PCB (polychlorinated biphenyls), and HAP’s (polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons) in marine and coastal environments of the Colombian Caribbean (Minciencias code: 71641), which belongs to the program Marine trophic networks of the Colombian Caribbean during the era of plastic and toxic pollutants (Minciencias code: 71475), funded by Minciencias and Universidad de Bogotá Jorge Tadeo Lozano and executed in alliance with Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Caribe campus. We would like to thank the work team members Diana Bustos, Paulo Tigreros, Luis Garzón, Gysseth Herrera, Jesús Ochoa, Camila Castellanos, Diana Rubio, Ana María Hernández, and Gamaliel Mejía for their support during sampling and laboratory processing. We express enormous gratitude to the numerous group of Marine Biology students, whose invaluable support was fundamental in completing field and laboratory activities.

LITERATURE CITED

Acosta V, Lodeiros C, Senior W, Martinez G. Niveles de metales pesados en sedimentos superficiales en tres zonas litorales de Venezuela. Interciencia; 2002;27686-690. [ Links ]

Ahmed MA, Ali SM, El-Dek SI, Galal A. Magnetite-hematite nanoparticles prepared by green methods for heavy metal ions removal from water. Mater. Sci. Eng. B. Solid. State. Mater. Adv. Technol.; 2013;178744-751. [ Links ]

Anbuselvan N, Senthil DN, Sridharan M. Heavy metal assessment in surface sediments off Coromandel coast of India: Implication on marine pollution. Mar. Pollut. Bull.; 2018;131712-726. [ Links ]

Anderson MJ, Gorley RN, Clarke KR. Permanova+ for Primer: guide to software and statistical methods. First. PRIMER-E Ltd; 2008. [ Links ]

Andrade CA. Análisis de la velocidad del viento en el mar Caribe. Bol. Cient. CIOH; 1993;1333-43. [ Links ]

Andrade-Amaya C, Thomas YF. Sedimentos en suspensión e hidrodinámica al sureste del delta del río Magdalena. Mar Caribe (Colombia). Bol. Cient. CIOH; 1988;827-34. [ Links ]

Ansari TM, Marr IL, Tariq N. Heavy metals in marine pollution perspective-A mini review. J. Appl. Sci.; 2004;41-20. [ Links ]

Arenas AA, Di Luccio D, Maggi S, Palmisano M, Salamanca Arévalo LA, Sanguino RA, Lay-Ekuakille A. Geochemical characterization of heavy metals in the sediments of the Sinú river (Colombia). 9th EnvIMEKO Symposium of Environmental Instrumentation and Measurements, Le Mans, France; 2022. 43-38. [ Links ]

Baird R, Eaton AD, Rice EW. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. Am. Public Health As., Washington D.C.; 2017. 541 p. [ Links ]

Baize D, Sterckeman T. Of the necessity of knowledge of the natural pedo-geochemical background content in the evaluation of the contamination of soils by trace elements. Sci. Total. Environ.; 2001;264127-139. [ Links ]

Bernal G. Caracterización geomorfológica de la llanura deltaica del Río Magdalena con énfasis en el sistema lagunar de la Ciénaga Grande de Santa Marta. Bol. Invest. Mar. Cost.; 1996;2519-48. [ Links ]

Bernal G, Poveda G, Roldán P, Andrade C. Patrones de variabilidad de las temperaturas superficiales del mar en la costa Caribe colombiana. Cienc. Tierra; 2006;30195-208. [ Links ]

Botsou F, Karageorgis AP, Dassenakis E, Scoullos M. Assessment of heavy metal contamination and mineral magnetic characterization of the Asopos River sediments (Central Greece). Mar. Pollut. Bull.; 2011;62547-563. [ Links ]

Bryan GW, Langston WJ, Langston J. Bioavailability, accumulation and effects of heavy metals in sediments with special reference to United Kingdom estuaries: a review. Environ. Pollut.; 1992;7689-131. [ Links ]

Buchman M. Screening Quick Reference Tables (SQuiRTs). NOAA OR&R report 08-1, Seattle, USA; 2008. Off. Resp. Rest. Div., Nat. Ocean. Atmos. Admin.. [ Links ]

Bundschuh J, Schneider J, Alam MA, Niazi NK, Herath I, Parvez F, Tomaszewska B, Guilherme LRG, Maity JP, López DL, Cirelli AF, Pérez-Carrera A, Morales-Simfors N, Alarcón-Herrera MT, Baisch P, Mohan D, Mukherjee A. Seven potential sources of arsenic pollution in Latin America and their environmental and health impacts. Sci. Total Environ.; 2021;7801-29. [ Links ]

Cadena-Torres J, Novoa Yánez RS, Grandett Martínez LM, Contreras Santos JL, Agámez Saibis A. Caracterización físico-química de los suelos dedicados al cultivo de maíz en el Valle del Sinú, Colombia. Tem. Agr.; 2021;2668-79. https://doi.org/10.21897/rta.v26i1.2584Links ]

Campbell N, Guy L. Surficial bottom sediments of Lake Taupo, New Zealand: Texture, composition, provenance, and sedimentation rates. N. Z. J. Geol. Geophys.; 1995;3861-79. [ Links ]

Campos NH. La contaminación por metales pesados en la Ciénaga Grande de Santa Marta, Caribe colombiano. Caldasia; 1990;16231-243. [ Links ]

Cantle JE. Atomic absorption spectrometry. Elsevier, Amsterdam; 1982. 337. [ Links ]

Castañé PM, Topalián ML, Cordero RR, Salibián A. Influencia de la especiación de los metales pesados en medio acuático como determinante de su toxicidad. Rev. Toxic.; 2003;2013-18. [ Links ]

Clarke KR, Gorley RN. PRIMER v7: User manual/tutorial. 1. Plymouth, United Kingdom: PRIMER-E Ltd; 2015. [ Links ]

Cosma B, Frache R, Baffi F, Dadone A. Trace metals in sediments from the Ligurian coast, Italy. Mar. Pollut. Bull.; 1982;13127-132. [ Links ]

de Souza-Machado AA, Spencer K, Kloas W, Toffolon M, Zarfl C. Metal fate and effects in estuaries: A review and conceptual model for better understanding of toxicity. Sci. Total Environ.; 2016;541268-281. [ Links ]

Escobar J. La contaminación de los ríos y sus efectos en las áreas costeras y el mar. CEPAL. Div. Rec. Nat. Infraestr. Nac. Un., Santiago de Chile; 2002. 68 p. [ Links ]

Espinosa LF, Parra JP, Villamil C. Determinación del contenido de metales pesados en las fracciones geoquímicas del sedimento superficial asociado a los manglares de la ciénaga grande de Santa Marta, Colombia. Bol. Invest. Mar. Cost.; 2011;407-23. [ Links ]

Estela F, López-Victoria M. Aves de la parte baja del río Sinú Caribe colombiano; inventario y ampliaciones de distribución. Bol. Invest. Mar. Cost.; 2005;347-42. [ Links ]

Feria JJ, Marrugo J, González H. Heavy metals in Sinú river, department of Córdoba, Colombia, South America. Rev. Fac. Ing. Univ. Antioquia; 2010;5535-44. [ Links ]

Fernández-Martínez R, Rucandio I, Gómez-Pinilla I, Borlaf F, García F, Larrea MT. Evaluation of different digestion systems for determination of trace mercury in seaweeds by cold vapour atomic fluorescence spectrometry. J. Food Compos. Anal.; 2015;387-12. [ Links ]

Förstner U, Wittmann GTW. Metal pollution in the aquatic environment. Springer-Verlag, Berlin; 1981. 486 p. [ Links ]

Gall JE, Boyd RS, Rajakaruna N. Transfer of heavy metals through terrestrial food webs: a review. Environ. Monit. Assess.; 2015;1871-21. [ Links ]

Gheorghe S, Stoica C, Vasile GG, Nita-Lazar M, Stanescu E, Lucaciu IE. Metals toxic effects in aquatic ecosystems: Modulators of water quality. InTech; 2017; 59-89. [ Links ]

Gimeno-García E, Andreu V, Boluda R. Heavy metals incidence in the application of inorganic fertilizers and pesticides to rice farming soils. Environ. Poll.; 1996;9219-25. [ Links ]

González V, Valle S, Nirchio M, Olivero J, Tejeda L, Valdelamar J, Pesantes F, González K. Evaluation of the risk of contamination by heavy metals (Hg and Pb) in marine sediments of estero Huaylá, Puerto Bolívar, Ecuador. Rev. Inst. Investig. Fac. Minas Metal. Cienc. Geogr.; 2018;214175-82. [ Links ]

Griscom SB, Fisher NS. Bioavailability of sediment-bound metals to marine bivalve molluscs: An overview. Est. Res. Fed.; 2004;27826-838. [ Links ]

Hakanson L. An ecological risk index for aquatic pollution control. A sedimentological approach. Water Research; 1980;14975-1001. [ Links ]

Harbison P. Mangrove muds—A sink and a source for trace metals. Mar. Pollut. Bull.; 1986;17246-250. [ Links ]

Ismail A. The use of intertidal molluscs in the monitoring of heavy metals and organotin compounds in the west coast of Peninsular Malaysia. Coast. Mar. Sci.; 2006;30401-406. [ Links ]

Jain CK, Singhal DC, Sharma MK. Metal pollution assessment of sediment and water in the River Hindon, India. Environ. Monit. Assess.; 2005;105193-207. [ Links ]

Kabata-Pendias A, Pendias H. Trace elements in soils and plants. CRC Press; 2001. 315. [ Links ]

Krumgalz BS, Fainshtein G, Cohen A. Grain size effect on anthropogenic trace metal and organic matter distribution in marine sediments. Sci. Total Environ.; 1992;11615-30. [ Links ]

Libes S. Introduction to marine biogeochemistry. Second. Academic Press, San Diego; 2011. 928. [ Links ]

Liu D, Wang J, Yu H, Gao H, Xu W. Evaluating ecological risks and tracking potential factors influencing heavy metals in sediments in an urban river. Environ. Sci. Eur.; 2021;3342-54. [ Links ]

Londoño-Franco LF, Londoño Muñoz PT, Muñoz Garcia FG. Los riesgos de los metales pesados en la salud humana y animal. Biotecnol. Sector Agropec. Agroind.; 2016;14145-153. [ Links ]

Lozano-Duque Y, Medellín-Mora J, Navas GR. Contexto climatológico y oceanográfico del mar Caribe colombiano. Biodiversidad del margen continental del Caribe colombiano; Navas GR, Segura-Quintero C, Garrido-Linares M, Benavides-Serrato M, Alonso-Carvajal DA. Invemar, Santa Marta; 2010. 54-84. 458 p. [ Links ]

Marrugo-Negrete J, Pinedo-Hernández J, Díez S. Assessment of heavy metal pollution, spatial distribution and origin in agricultural soils along the Sinú River Basin, Colombia. Environ. Res.; 2017;154380-388. [ Links ]

Mancera-Pineda JE, Pinto G, Vilardy S. Patrones de distribución estacional de masas de agua en la bahía de Santa Marta, Caribe colombiano: Importancia relativa del upwelling y outwelling. Bol. Invest. Mar. y Costeras; 2013;42329-360. [ Links ]

Matagi SV, Swai D, Mugabe A. A review of heavy metal removal mechanisms in wetlands. Afr. J. Trop. Hydrobiol.; 1998;823-35. [ Links ]

McCave IN. Erosion, transport and deposition of fine-grained marine sediments. Geol. Soc.; 1984;1535-69. [ Links ]

Meyerson AL, Luther GW, Krajewski J, Hires RI. Heavy metal distribution in Newark Bay sediments. Mar. Pollut. Bull.; 1981;12244-250. [ Links ]

Minoia C, Caroli S. Applications of zeeman graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry in the chemical laboratory and in toxicology. Pergamon Press. Oxford. 702. 1992. [ Links ]

Morillo J, Usero J, Gracia I. Heavy metal distribution in marine sediments from the southwest coast of Spain. Chemosphere. 2004;55431-442. [ Links ]

Noreña-Ramirez D, Murillo-Perea E, Guio-Duque JA, Méndez-Arteaga J. Metales pesados (Cd, Pb y Ni) en especies de peces de importancia comercial del río Magdalena, tramo Tolima, Colombia. Rev. Tumbaga. 2012;261-77. [ Links ]

Okoro HK, Fatoki OS, Adekola FA, Ximba BJ, Snyman RG, Mdokwana BW. The effect of particle sizes on metal accumulation in the marine sediments of Cape Town harbour. J. NC Acad. Sci. 2013;1293115-125. [ Links ]

Orihuela DE, Tovilla Hernández C, Franciscus H, Vester M, Legorreta TA. Flujo de materia en un manglar de la costa de Chiapas, México. Madera y Bosques. 2004;10245-61. [ Links ]

Ortiz-Romero LT, Delgado-Tascón J, Pardo-Rodríguez A, Murillo-Perea D, Guio Duque J. Determinación de metales pesados e índices de calidad en aguas y sedimentos del río Magdalena -Tramo Tolima, Colombia. Rev. Tumbaga. 2015;243-60. [ Links ]

Pabón S, Benítez R, Sarria R, Gallo J. Contaminación del agua por metales pesados, métodos de análisis y tecnologías de remoción. Entre Cienc. Ing.. 2020;149-18. [ Links ]

Pérez-López M, Nóvoa MC, Alonso J, García Fernández MA, Melgar MJ. Niveles de plomo y cadmio en agua marina y lapas (Patella vulgata L.) de la Ría de Vigo. Rev. Toxicol.. 2003;2019-22. [ Links ]

Poot A, Gillissen F, Koelmans AA. Effects of flow regime and flooding on heavy metal availability in sediment and soil of a dynamic river system. Environ. Poll.. 2007;148779-787. [ Links ]

Pujos M, Pagliardini J, Steer R, Vernette G, Weber O. Influencia de la contracorriente norte colombiana para la circulación de las aguas en la plataforma continental: su acción sobre la dispersión de los efluentes en suspensión del río Magdalena. Bol. Cient. CIOH. 1986;3-16. [ Links ]

Pye K, Blott SJ. Particle size analysis of sediments, soils and related particulate materials for forensic purposes using laser granulometry. Forensic Sci. Int.. 2004;14419-27. [ Links ]

Restrepo JD, Kjerfve B. Magdalena river: interannual variability (1975-1995) and revised water discharge and sediment load estimates. J. Hydrol. 2000;235137-149. [ Links ]

Rizzo A, Daga R, Arcagni M, Catán SP, Bubach D, Sánchez R, Guevara SR, Arribere MA. Concentraciones de metales pesados en distintos compartimentos de lagos andinos de Patagonia Norte. Ecol. Austr.. 2010;20155-171. [ Links ]

Roozbahani MM, Sobhanardakani S, Karimi H, Sorooshnia R. Natural and Anthropogenic Source of Heavy Metals Pollution in the Soil Samples of an Industrial Complex; a Case Study. Iran. J. Toxicol.. 2015;9291336-1341. [ Links ]

Rubio B, Nombela MA, Vilas F. La contaminación por metales pesados en las Rías Baixas gallegas: nuevos valores de fondo para la Ría de Vigo (NO de España). J. Iber. Geol.. 2000;26121-149. [ Links ]

Salzwedel H, Müller K. A summary of meteorological and hydrological data from the bay of Santa Marta, Colombian Caribbean. An. Inst. Invest. Mar. Punta Betín. 1983;1367-83. [ Links ]

Sander SG, Buck KN, Wells M. The effect of natural organic ligands on trace metal speciation in San Francisco Bay: Implications for water quality criteria. Mar. Chem.. 2015;173269-281. [ Links ]

Szava-Kovats RC. Grain-size normalization as a tool to assess contamination in marine sediments: Is the < 63 μm fraction fine enough?. Mar. Pollut. Bull.. 2008;56629-632. [ Links ]

Tansel B, Rafiuddin S. Heavy metal content in relation to particle size and organic content of surficial sediments in Miami River and transport potential. Int. J. Sediment Res.. 2016;31324-329. [ Links ]

Tessier A, Campbell PGC. Comments on the testing of the accuracy of an extraction procedure for determining the partitioning of trace metals in sediments. Anal. Chem.. 1988;601475-1476. [ Links ]

Tejeda-Benítez L, Flegal R, Odigie K, Olivero-Verbel J. Pollution by metals and toxicity assessment using Caenorhabditis elegans in sediments from the Magdalena River, Colombia. Environ. Pollut.. 2016;212238-250. [ Links ]

Tulonen T, Pihlström M, Arvola L, Rask M. Concentrations of heavy metals in food web components of small boreal lakes. Boreal. Environ. Res.. 2006;1111185-194. [ Links ]

Welz B, Sperling M. Atomic Absorption Spectrometry. Wiley-VCH. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-9244(08)70146-XLinks ]

Wright P, Mason CF. Spatial and seasonal variation in heavy metals in the sediments and biota of two adjacent estuaries, the Orwell and the Stour, in eastern England. Sci. Total Environ.. 1999;226139-156. [ Links ]

Yang Y, Yang X, He M, Christakos G. Beyond mere pollution source identification: Determination of land covers emitting soil heavy metals by combining PCA/APCS, GeoDetector and GIS analysis. Catena (Amst). 2020;185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2019.104297Links ]

Yao Q, Wang X, Jian H, Chen H, Yu Z. Characterization of the particle size fraction associated with heavy metals in suspended sediments of the Yellow River. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2015;126725-6744. [ Links ]

Zhang Y, Lu X, Wang N, Xin M, Geng S, Jia J, Meng Q. Heavy metals in aquatic organisms of different trophic levels and their potential human health risk in Bohai Bay, China. Environ. Sci. Poll. Res.. 2016;2317801-17810. [ Links ]

Citation: Navarro-Martínez, A.; Vélez-Mendoza, N.; Almario-García, M.; Campos-Campos, N.H.; Sanjuan-Muñoz, A. 2025. Contaminación en sedimentos por metales (As, Cd, Cr, Cu, Hg, Ni y Pb) en el Caribe colombiano. Bol. Invest. Mar. Cost., 54(1): 153-174

ANNEX 1

Annex 1 Average concentrations and standard deviation for each metal (-x ± DE) in the localities (ROD, TAS, SAL, CGSM, and ATL) of the Magdalena sector and those (CAI, CIS, ZEN, TIN, and ISF) of the Sinú sector 

Annex 2

Annex 2 Permanova analysis to evaluate significant differences between the localities (LO) during both periods (PE) of the year in the two sectors (SE). GL: degrees of freedom, SC: sum of squares, CM: mean square. P(MC) p-value with Monte Carlo correction con (˂ 0.05) indicates significant differences. 

Annex 3

Annex 3 Permanova comparisons between localities (LO) nested within sectors (LO(SE)). 

* P(MC) p-value with Monte Carlo correction con (˂0.05) indicates significant differences

Annex 4

Annex 4 Potential ecological risk coefficients (PERC) and potential ecological risk index (PERI). Low ● and moderate ● pollution 

Received: October 28, 2024; Accepted: November 20, 2024

Creative Commons License This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License