Services on Demand
Journal
Article
Indicators
Cited by SciELO
Access statistics
Related links
Cited by Google
Similars in
SciELO
Similars in Google
Share
Novum Jus
Print version ISSN 1692-6013On-line version ISSN 2500-8692
Abstract
PANTOJA-RUIZ, Juan Pablo and HERNANDEZ-JIMENEZ, Norberto. Derived Ineligibility to Contract with the State: A Form of Corporate Criminal Liability in Colombia?. Novum Jus [online]. 2024, vol.18, n.1, pp.156-180. Epub July 17, 2024. ISSN 1692-6013. https://doi.org/10.14718/novumjus.2024.18.1.6.
In Colombia, strictly speaking, there is no regime of criminal liability for legal entities. However, in our public procurement statute (subsection j of Article 8 of Law 80 of 1993), a perpetual disqualification to contract with the State is established when a natural person has been convicted of crimes against public administration. This disqualification extends to legal entities in which that person participates as an administrator, legal representative, board member, or controlling partner. The disqualification, which certainly affects the legal entity, lacks an opportunity within the criminal procedural framework for the affected legal entity to exercise the right to defense. Based on the above, using a methodology grounded in hermeneutics, legal doctrine, and the coherence of the national legal system in its various specialties, the authors debate both the legal nature of this disqualification -especially whether it constitutes a sanction against the legal entity or a mere preventive mechanism- and the suitability and constitutionality of this measure, within the context of the expanding punitive approach and the facade of zero tolerance towards acts of corruption. It is concluded that the derived or extended disqualification is indeed a sanction, originating from a criminal conviction, and therefore should respect the principles of culpability, presumption of innocence, and access to the administration of justice, with which it inevitably collides.
Keywords : Personal liability; author-based criminal law; proportionality; punitive populism; corporate criminal liability; economic criminal law; state contracting; compliance.












