SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.51 número1A conversão eletrocatalítica de etanal em glioxal. Uma avaliação teóricaA descrição teórica do desempenho eletroanalítico do material compósito de oxihidróxido de vanádio com o corante esquárico na detecção da carfedona índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • Em processo de indexaçãoCitado por Google
  • Não possue artigos similaresSimilares em SciELO
  • Em processo de indexaçãoSimilares em Google

Compartilhar


Revista Colombiana de Ciencias Químico - Farmacéuticas

versão impressa ISSN 0034-7418versão On-line ISSN 1909-6356

Resumo

LOPEZ G., José Julián; CALDERON V., Carlos Mauricio  e  CORTAZAR C., Yira Constanza. Use of linezolid in a high complexity hospital of Bogotá city. Rev. colomb. cienc. quim. farm. [online]. 2022, vol.51, n.1, pp.443-457.  Epub 08-Dez-2023. ISSN 0034-7418.  https://doi.org/10.15446/rcciquifa.v51n1.102726.

Introduction:

Studying the prescription of last generation antibiotics helps to identify the causes and consequences of the inadequate use of antibiotics. These include the appearance of antibacterial resistance, a situation declared by the WHO as a global public health problem.

Aim:

To describe the prescription of linezolid in a high complexity hospital in Bogotá, Colombia, considering the follow-up of the recommendations for the use of the drug included in clinical practice guidelines (CPG) and its indications.

Methods:

A descriptive observational study of longitudinal section was performed with retrospective collection of the information of all patients who were prescribed linezolid, at a minimum dose of 600 mg every 12 h during their hospitalization in the period from January 1st, 2017, to December 31st, 2018. The characteristics of linezolid prescription were described.

Results:

133 prescriptions were reviewed. The most frequently diagnosed were sepsis of different origin (pulmonary abdominal, urinary) with 22.6 % (30/133), followed by skin and soft tissue infection 16.5 % (22/133), the pneumonia with 12.8 % (17/133) and urinary tract infections with 9.8 % (13/133). Two days treatment was the most frequent (range 1-30 days). In 33 % (44/133) of the patients, linezolid was used empirically (without using a previous antibiotic), while in 40.6 % (54/133) it was used as a second option (a previous antibiotic scheme). It was used as a third option in 20.3 % (27/133). Finally, in 6 % (8/133) of the patients, linezolid was prescribed after three previous antibiotics. It was necessary to use another antibiotic in near fifty percent of patients because linezolid did not work.

Conclusions:

The present study shows that there is little adherence to the institutional CPGs in relation to the treatment time, the microorganism identification, and the use as first option. The absence of a full-time infectious disease specialist, the high workload and the continuous rotation of prescribing staff may be the cause of these results. Some cases of inappropriate use may be related to the clinical condition of the patient which requires empirical treatments.

Palavras-chave : Drug resistance; anti-infective agents; inappropriate prescribing.

        · resumo em Português | Espanhol     · texto em Inglês     · Inglês ( pdf )